Posted by ks55 > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

We are not particularly interested in who to be the next POTUS.
What is more important is who inflict more harm to the economy of this world.
Trump is known to be a Tariff Man, Biden is known as Alpha Wolf to attack others with his pack, Kamala is known for her laughter when she could not handle situation.

Who is pose the least harm? Losing 50 steps is laughing at 100 steps? Lam pa pa lam.

Posted by ks55 > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Are they fit to be POTUS?
Is it proper for such person to be POTUS?
Are they fit and proper person to be elected as POTUS?

Seems that no capable candidate to stand for US Presidential Election. At the end of the day, not only Americans suffer, you and me suffer as well.

Posted by Birdie > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Both are lousy candidates. USA deserves better. But Trump will beat Kamala Harris. Wait for Trump 2.0. Only good thing is that Trump thinks like a businessman. He will stop the war in Ukraine, and Israel will be restrained . That is good enough for me.

Posted by GreatDreamer > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

When Ukraine war ended, inflation will come down especially bread price. And also oil price. US interest rate will come down faster.

Posted by calvintaneng > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Under the current circumstance the best person is still Donald Trump for these reasons

1. Trump is against abortion and as such he has won the Bible belt states

2. Trump's trade tariff might backfire against the farmers but again Trump offers subsidy to them. So he will win over the farm belt

3. Putin is a quiet "friend" of Trump and as such there will be a solution to the Ukraine war

4. With A stumbling Joe Biden out of the way the Democrats are already on the losing side with so little time. Trump's 2nd Term already a given
See. His demand for Taiwan to pay for defense carries weight as Tmsc share price went down as well as Other Tech shares since his belligerent stance with high tariff proposed

What Trump will do next is clear. He will put American interest first and that in his own way.
Obama wanted to contain China by joining Transpacific Partnership (TPP) by using Asean

Trump does not bother at all

He wants confrontation and not containment

If possible Trump wants China and all the world to relocate and build new factories on American soil to give jobs to Americans

Uppermost in his mind Trump is a practical no nonsense businessman

Good for America
But the world must watch out

Gone will be the good times of gains at the expense of Uncle Sam's largese

For Malaysia we still got Palm oil which will be the needed salvation

Posted by qqq47660 > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Lots of propaganda sh.it going on. Mainstream media hated trump for years

Posted by qqq47660 > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Not saying a or b just saying don't believe their sh.it

Posted by qqq47660 > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Between the two, social media in China prefers trump.
The globalist party means forever wars and in Ukraine

Posted by qqq47660 > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Voters in Europe largely rejected the globalist politicians. Hope voters in America also reject the globalists

Posted by qqq47660 > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

No more place for globalist politicians. Only place for shared destiny of mankind

Posted by qqq47660 > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Americans can vote. Non Americans cannot vote and their choice affects all of us. Vote for Kamala is vote for ww3

Posted by speakup > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

KYY tell us lah what stock to sai lang

Posted by ahbah > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Vote for triumph is vote for triumph of peace over war ? 😁😁😁

Posted by qqq47660 > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Ukraine war is establishment war. That kamala. Is a face for the establishment

Posted by calvintaneng > 1 month ago |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by Spacewhalezz > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Easy win for Trump

Posted by DickyMe > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Nominating Kamala Hairiss itself shows how US had regressed in its administration.
Third rate politicians are abundant in US.