hi all.. this quarter report. I think hapseng revenue and profit will drop compare with previous. Last time profit increase due to sell the asset. (Maybe CPO price raise and help a bit in the profit)
3 more weeks. jtoh1985, employee salary is the highest operating expenses in any company. Once the QR out, I can know the impact for the rest of the year. Headcount is pre-determined before the start of a year
Hjey, why u so worried about operating expenses in HapSeng due to employee salary? Every company will experience the same situation. Take it easy. Look for long term.
Where is haikeyilla? This love-lorn lady was always able to intuit the trend of Hap Seng quite accurately. She may be able to dispel our cluelessness about the price trend of Hap Seng.
It's common SOP in public company to conduct yearly appraisal for executive and non-executive staff. Hap Seng Group has more than thousand employees. I don't know actual number but Hap Seng involved in plantation, property and quarry. These 3 sectors employed a lot non-executive staff. For non-executive staff, they are being paid low salary which is below RM900.
A reduction in net profit will cause a lower dividend payout.
2009 net profit 100m, 2010 323m 2011 375m, 2012 422m, 2013 588m. According to Ooi Teik Bee, these r not true profit from operation. wow bigggg problem!!
I am not good in accounting but I know extraordinary gain calculated before PAT. 500 mil is net profit which means operating profit around 700 to 800 mil
After deducting the non-operating profit, the operating profit for financial year ended 31st Dec 2013 was RM372 million. This gave a return on equity of 9.8% - which is reasonable. This translate into an earnings per share of 17.1 sen per share, which to me, is also reasonable.
@iafx. Not salah. I deduct the financing cost (an operating cost) of RM75 million from the operating profit (before financing cost) of RM447 million. Otherwise I would have overstate both the ROE and EPS. Please refer to page 98 of the annual report publish via Bursa.
@iafx. No, if you want to know the true performance of the business, use the operating profit before tax. Tax does not reflect the performance/potential of the business because it is not the direct result of management decision-making. Financing cost is an operating cost. This counter is medium term counter because of management intervention on the price. To gauge the price trend, look at the change in operating profit.
if so, y exclude the non-ops profit 415m? it's mgmt decision to sell and gain. also, financing cost (e.g. interest) is direct result of management decision-making?
Non-op profit is not the result of management performance. E.g. sale of a building at a profit when the business is not buying and selling buildings. Because it is not a profit from operations, it will not be recurring profit - i.e. a one-off. Some non-op profit do not result in positive cash flow. E.g. reversal of over-provision for asset impairment. Financing cost is a direct result of management decision-making.
hahaha... in yr e.g., it booked as cost but ignored as profit, make sense? anyway, after u :D
it's like someone worked as clerk, invested a property. some years later sold but doesn't need to pay tax bcos it's not recurring, also not the clerk's effort (mgmt. performance?) maintaining the loan.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
iafx
4,632 posts
Posted by iafx > 2014-05-06 11:19 | Report Abuse
stronger plantation profits expected: http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/business-news/288162-plantation-outlook-maybank-expects-stronger-plantation-profits-in-1q14.html