@ Pitbull, sure there will be impact but to what extent I m not too sure. If u refer back to 2016 2Q, I think the average oil price is around $46/47 Petronm still make reasonable profit. However this is also because of improved refinery margin as compared to 2016 1Q
from sumato88 posting and findings that Petron M is operating at 50% of its refinery capacity and its 'topping up' by sourcing refined products, i have led to the following opinions:
i) the reason why the figures of Sales volume in terms of barrel is nicely matching its rated capacity is because they 'top up' with externally sourced refined products quantity is limited by the plant set up , e.g the pumping capacity and storage tank facility which was originally catered for the full refining capacity.
ii) since they procuring the remaining refined oil at MOPS pricing - they stand no risk at all on stock loss -as their margin is actually the difference of the 1 month moving average of 'MOPS + government determined fixed margin (32 & 23 cents for petrol and diesel respectively) ' versus COGS / feed material at 2 weeks moving average price of MOPS.
iii) Wondering the reason they source externally is because they are getting high quality refined oil produced from Petron Inc (philippines) new 180,000 bpd plant with the latest efficient technology.
This means Petron have significant advantage compared to its competitors. But need to really verify my suspicions above. Would appreciate to have others thoughts...
they must be procuring at below MOPS values in 1 month batches just the same way the automated finished products pricing works at the Gas stations.
Now...if they can increase the pumping capacity and storage tank that can easily increase their volume...wondering why they were seeking for bidders for supply of refined oil?
I suspect the capacity is not all for popular products like petrol and LPG. so it won't make sense if they ramp up the utilisation rate and produce other refining products which have lower demand
These plants are built to operate at the rated capacity. When a plant operates at reduced throughput, the efficiency actually drops.
Even if they are producing 'low value added products - LVAP' via the refining, it does not make sense to operate at a reduced throughput. As long as there are consumer for these LVAP its always more economic to operate at full capacity.
There is only one plausible reason for them to operate at reduced capacity: To allow another value addition process - HVAP which competes with its resources to run at higher capacity, meaning they are occupying their tank spaces and pumps for these externally sourced refined products and its constraining them from running at full capacity.
I think if the HVAP demand increases, they can just increase throughput via the non-refining facilities, and if the new facilities can handle the full demand of the HVAP stream, then they can start operating the refinery in full swing again.
They can then also shutdown the refinery and fully use the facilities for the HVAP stream if the demand volume justifies.
Posted by Jay > Mar 16, 2017 03:23 PM | Report Abuse
I suspect the capacity is not all for popular products like petrol and LPG. so it won't make sense if they ramp up the utilisation rate and produce other refining products which have lower demand
1. the refinery plant by design should have taken into account all those tank spaces and pumps right? 2. seems like the sales every quarter much exceeded what they produce, isn't the demand already there? 3. what do you mean by HVAP? is that further refining of refined products? 4. what do you mean if HVAP demand volume justifies, they can shutdown the refinery?
sorry jay, really not good at explaining things....will try again:
1. the refinery plant by design should have taken into account all those tank spaces and pumps right? yes. 2. seems like the sales every quarter much exceeded what they produce, isn't the demand already there? yes. 3. what do you mean by HVAP? is that further refining of refined products? just a short form i created for Higher Value Added Product (stream). 4. what do you mean if HVAP demand volume justifies, they can shutdown the refinery? Ok..will clarify again as per below:
For simplicity View the refinery as a pipeline (stream 1: Crude Oil) running from its Feed Tanks 1A & 1B via Pump 1A & 1B to process vessel 1 and then to Refined Product Tanks 2A, 2B, and byproduct tanks 2C, 2D etc via Pump 21, 2B, 2C and 2D respectively. This is how the refinery were made for a flowrate through the system at 88k bpd.
The Process vessel 1 is the heart of the refinery and what defines the refining capacity, and any reduction on throughput on this Process vessel 1 basically means higher utilities and overhead cost per barrel processed (Feed stream 1 and all the products and by product it produces).
Now, if they are not operating at full capacity now, it means some other stream 2 is constraining its facilities. Facilities means either the Feed or Product storage tank or their existing pumps in the refinery complex as mentioned above.
If they are compromising stream 1 throughput for stream 2 - that means stream 2 is much higher value added product (HVAP) than stream 1 (LVAP).
Meaning the value addition they obtain on stream 2 per barrel is higher than stream 1 though they did not run through the process vessel 1 (which gives the definition of refining).
Stream 2 does not run through the process vessel 1. That is the reason they report the refining capacity low though when you add up stream 1 & 2 its comes approximately 88 k bpd.
If the demand for stream 2 increases, the may even start to use both Feed Tank 1A & 1B causing the refinery to shutdown - as it justifies economically.
Alternatively, they can just built these facilities (new for stream 2) so that it does no compete with stream 1 and allow the refinery to operate at full capacity.
The above is how i view whats going on currently...from the available facts.
oh I see. but I think petron purchase to plug the gap between production and sales. so is the stream 2 to process these? or they could have secured supply of ready fuel to resale without need to further process?
Posted by Jay > Mar 17, 2017 11:55 AM | Report Abuse
oh I see. but I think petron purchase to plug the gap between production and sales.
A: I think this stream 2 is all going to their Retail sections. The growth on stream 2 seems proportional to the growth in their gas stations. This is where their margins are fat, secure and stable - unlike volatile refinery margin.
Stream 1 is being operated as they still have room to operate it as the stream 2 demand has not catched to a level of 88k bpd. Its like their gas stations only need about 44k bpd currently...so why shutdown the refinery?
so is the stream 2 to process these? A: very likely as per my opinion above.
or they could have secured supply of ready fuel to resale without need to further process? A: This is what i think so - i think they have more margins to make by sourcing (perhaps from Petron Inc) then producing from their old refinery made in 1970s(is it 1963?).
Stream 2 quality and price could be way more superior and competitive than what is produced by stream 1. Stream is probably sold to external local consumers.
Technical side, I m not too familiar, is it possible they intent to allocate more of their refinery facilities to produce HVAP i.e. Ron 100 & Euro 5M Disel which have better sales margin ?
Refineries configured to have a large conversion and desulfuration capacity can achieve higher returns in higher-value refined products, since they process heavier and sourer crude than refineries with lower conversion and desulfuration capacity.
Posted by 逍遥子 > Mar 17, 2017 12:14 PM | Report Abuse
Technical side, I m not too familiar, is it possible they intent to allocate more of their refinery facilities to produce HVAP i.e. Ron 100 & Euro 5M Disel which have better sales margin ?
Just went through all the annual reports 2010 -2011. The refinery had been modified to run at a lower throughput efficiently to handle low sulfur crude oil. So, this 45k bpd is the throughput we can expect.
The sales volume of the barrels are inclusive of the outsourced refined products to feed the retail sections.
From the revenue reported and the barrels sold, it can only be true if ~ 50% of the throughput in barrels are sold as finished products - 60% Petrol and 40% Diesel fractions at retails pricing and the remaining 50% at MOPS pricing…
If u are in for long term then Just put aside and relax, someone want to press down the price then let it be, sooner or later the fundamental value will be slowly unlock.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Equityengineer
1,674 posts
Posted by Equityengineer > 2017-03-16 11:05 | Report Abuse
Cheers