Earning Per Share in 2012 was 23.80 and in 2013 was 18.80 (earning dropped)and Dividend per share in 2012 was 16.00 and in 2013 was 20.00 (dividend increased). Why dividend increased in 2013 from 2012 when EPS dropped? When dividend increased, people chase after the share, so price increase.
But when you look at non big event years..(this info is all from annual report).
Earning Per share in 2013 was 18.80 and in 2014 was 18.00. (DPS dropped by 0.80) and Dividend per share in 2013 was 20.00 and in 2014 was 20.00 (ok la, make sense, cause EPS only dropped 0.80 so can maintain DPS of 20.00)
EPS in 2014 was 18.00 and in 2015 was 15.90. DPS in 2014 was 20.00 and in 2015 was 16.00 (EPS dropped, DPS dropped). EPS in 2015 was 15.90 and in 2016 was 13.30. DPS in 2015 was 16.00 and in 2016 was 13.00 (EPS dropped, DPS dropped).
Why such strange phenomenon happened in only in 2013? I'm sure it's all only a coincidence. Nothing pre-planned.
TRADEVIEW always uphold value investing,but follow KCCHONGZ better la.. TRADEVIEW also criticized FAVCO. look at FAVCO stalwartly standing. sor chai ikut tradeview
stupid la . last year when magum 2.20. many ib come out shout say magnum undervalued. magnum is a high dividend company . publis miss look magnum. i remembered many ib come out support magnum including Maybank. now magnum give all them a thousand hundreds slap slap by cut dividend. magnum boss earn all the money alone. magnum is a cash money business . some loss or high debt company also keep paying dividend example got jcy and wtk and many many . magnum reserved a lot of cash . this is i feel unfair. what the director planing . and if you survey sunday when 4d open day. actually toto and magnum shops customers almost same one. just toto customers like play small and jackpot but magnum customers all play big big one. so magnum boss i suggest you don't cheat on your account and be fair to some who bought in at high price. people don't believe you no money . illegal 4d was there when my grandmother time not now so please don't give excuse.
Page 8 of their annual report for 2016 paragraph B (last paragraph of Page 8). And i quote, "As at 31 December 2016, the audited retained profits of the Company amounted to approximately RM1,425.1 million;"
talking about illegal, no one bet big.. small bet only coz the winnings is not guaranteed! If hit above 100k, say pow chong la.. this la that la.. no 100% returns
under companies act 2016 company paying dividend must be able to meet liabilities arising within the next 12 months. Now additional tax problem RM476 million which is more than its cash reserve. How to pay ?
now not only penny stocks will make people loss big money, magnum also can do that, last time is high dividend, good defensive counter, actually now also got cash but the boss playing us ?
Look like very bad, keep sliding down. Mgt of Magnum keep silent, means IRB thing not settle. Do not catch the falling knife. Rm1.60 or below look possible company keeps silent.
What is the feeling of those top shareholders as the price has come down so much. What are the benefits for them to keep on holding this dropping counter? Anyone can clarify? TQ.
Well to be fair the IRB verdict is unexpected. This should be considered a once off incident. However analysis should be made on the future cash flows of the company. How can the company reinvent themselves is importanr
this contested case is a winning case. how can irb applied the present rule to add back those interest cost way back from 2008 which already 10 years transactions. those 10 years ago, the irb rules are different from just implemented today rules. it is obviously a winning case. it is really impacted us on the big drop in magnum shres price.
Yeah, mustang, agree with you. In uncertainty think better not touch it. Those willing to take risk for a few cents gain can go ahead. If lower tax liability then good for those who bought and willing to take risk. Think if lower than 1.50, there may be a good case to take risk. Good luck to all willing to take risk to buy now..
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
bestreturn
127 posts
Posted by bestreturn > 2017-05-30 17:05 | Report Abuse
Earning Per Share in 2012 was 23.80 and in 2013 was 18.80 (earning dropped)and Dividend per share in 2012 was 16.00 and in 2013 was 20.00 (dividend increased). Why dividend increased in 2013 from 2012 when EPS dropped? When dividend increased, people chase after the share, so price increase.
But when you look at non big event years..(this info is all from annual report).
Earning Per share in 2013 was 18.80 and in 2014 was 18.00. (DPS dropped by 0.80) and Dividend per share in 2013 was 20.00 and in 2014 was 20.00 (ok la, make sense, cause EPS only dropped 0.80 so can maintain DPS of 20.00)
EPS in 2014 was 18.00 and in 2015 was 15.90. DPS in 2014 was 20.00 and in 2015 was 16.00 (EPS dropped, DPS dropped). EPS in 2015 was 15.90 and in 2016 was 13.30. DPS in 2015 was 16.00 and in 2016 was 13.00 (EPS dropped, DPS dropped).
Why such strange phenomenon happened in only in 2013? I'm sure it's all only a coincidence. Nothing pre-planned.