It depends how you interpret the latest results. If you look at it from the annual basis, of course it has been expected to do poorer than 2013. On other hand, if you look at the quarterly basis, it has already break even its profit performance. That would probably mean that in Q3 2014, the results would most probably better than Q3 2013. That's what matters most. It finally done with its bottom and now it's the cycle to perform better than previous quarters.
Really need a lot of patience with this counter. HOLD for now and wait for Q3 results in November. That should give some booster for this counter to move.
Mr. Cheng, you use the Parkson money to buy treasury shares to support shares prices. I thought it was a good thing for you to think for the shareholders. But when you give back the treasury shares back to shareholders as special dividends and you start selling shopping mall to raise more cash. I began to wonder: what is the point for me to hold on to the shares of your company that has to sell properties to raise cash to buy treasury shares. isn't it ? you tell me. What is the point for shareholders to hold more shares on a company while you are selling away company assets? Is this a good thing to do while you gain more shares at the expense of selling away company assets? I know you want to sell those shares away when the economy recovers but....The economy is so uncertain, it may stay bad for another 10 years, who knows. I hope you pray that you have enough assets to sell for 10 years!
"People" factor is the most important element you need. Whatever you do, the focus should be to satisfy your customers (the people). Building malls and cutting down on expenses should be tailor at making customers more happy. You try to save here and spend there to extend your lifecycle is not going to help Parkson at all. You must change the whole culture at Parkson and go after what customers will need in the future. Buying time is not the way out, your competitions like Aeon will grow so big that all your businesses will be taken away. It is good to reduce the number of locations to cut down on expenses. But whatever that is new has to put "people" as the first place. That is why they said: You can never just count on Good Luck (Good Economy) alone.
Selling off under performed, low potential or already exceed its potential assets is a strategy. You can't keep holding to your assets if they are not giving you the potential return. Same for those already peak at their potential and you fetched a good price to sell it. The question should be direct to what's next? With the cash raised, is there any new investment? If there is, is the investment sound with potential return vis-a-vis its risk?
The general truth is, with high risk, there is a potential of high return. So, where is Parkson investing next and what is the potential return?
They are selling assets so that they can record some profits on their profit and loss statement while revenue is plunging (to solve short term trouble). To the guy who owns shares in this company, it is his shares and the prices of the shares (now) that are more important to him than the company itself (the future). In other words, he is share price driven more than he is company driven. His incentives is on the shares. Not the company, that is why all the Lion companies go to Holland. Then of course, this strategy relies on : (1) the economy must surely revive, and (2) there are no competitors on the market!
I just invented a song: "I don't want to go to Holland", "I don't want to pay the price for a dream with a risk", and "I don't want to play play with my money"............."I don't want to go to toilet now", "I don't want to make myself feel good", and " I don't want to pay the price for money with money."
Yah right, Parkson vs Aeon, you see what happen 5 years from now. The company basically just pay rentals and collect rentals from small retailers who set up counters inside their premises. This is the major thing they do. They listed their shares in several places, Malaysia, Hong Kong, and where else, because they are the strong Brand Name at that time. But times have changed. They have very few fixed assets and but high cash position because of the listings before. But time have changed, they can't just rely on their "Brand" anymore. This is a company functioning like a bond investment with higher risk. Even reit is safer because at least those issuing companies still hold fixed assets. What about Parkson? Very low fixed assets ratio!
Although I bought Parkson 2 times earlier this year I dare go in now despite price has dropped due to 1) EPS has dropped over the years due to rising cost like rental, staff cost 2) Share buy back stop as ks55 mention due to lack of cash? If want to get dividend better buy Reit stocks which can charge their tenants higher rental.
As per the news, I don't think it's a lease but more to a mall management service. Meaning Parkson is getting paid to manage the junction mall. Isn't it?
The price of Parkson would most probably goes south further due to weak results from both PRG and PRA. Just to highlight that both still making profit though it is less than YoY.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
AdCool
3,864 posts
Posted by AdCool > 2014-08-27 00:02 | Report Abuse
It depends how you interpret the latest results. If you look at it from the annual basis, of course it has been expected to do poorer than 2013. On other hand, if you look at the quarterly basis, it has already break even its profit performance. That would probably mean that in Q3 2014, the results would most probably better than Q3 2013. That's what matters most. It finally done with its bottom and now it's the cycle to perform better than previous quarters.