Libra?The country is still in a mess with just about everyone involved helping different sides in the uncivil war. Sadly for the USA and its army they lost in Vietnam, although now seem to be mates with the commie leadership. They certainly didn't defeat the terrible
There is this singleminded obsession with the US-China rivalry, but the world is so much bigger when you consider the non-superpowers alone. And among the 200 or so nations there aren‘t many that love the two heavy-weights. A majority of us do wish that if a war is inevitable it be the USA that wins it. I believe it is a certainty that all nations have some troubling beef with the CCP, and none is anti-China as such.
China is not alone....Argentina and Brazil are friendly and reliable suppliers to China, of course plus many more countries such as Germany, France, Switzerland, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, Cambodia and New Zealand, etc. etc.
The US is desperate! World opinion turning increasingly indifferent & hostile! Even the EU rejected US’s WHO resolution on China! . But the BIGGEST THREAT is not China! It is Asia! The fast economic growth is fatal to US interest! . Solution: Trap Asia into killing each other like in the M. East! Goading India or Taiwan to start a conflict will give US legitimacy to join the war big time & roil the whole region into turmoil! . Result? Asian economic threat gone; US growing rich with arms sales; No more super China or India or the Asian Tigers! Everything back to normal with the US as KING!
Now is the time for China to do a tactical retreat, give up the spratly islands and Taiwan. Concentrate on the Belt Road and good relations with the other nations. However deal a body blow to U.S. AUS/NZ/CANADA, with a cessation of all trade, and be patient and wait as U.S.implodes as will the E.U. Time is on the Chinese side, so it must be used.
Bowing down to external pressure is not always a solution. President Xi is right about the trap. Don’t inspire your country to bow down always if you love your country. Rather standing up will solve the problem, though with some initial pain, which is inevitable. Don't be coward to face things if you Don't serve others purpose.
A hot war between US and China is in nobody's interest. China is not ready now, even for a little hot war in the South China Sea let alone military ambitions for Taiwan. The same old Sunzhi art of war applies, win a war without firing a shot! That's China's game. Can US has the patience?
Larrie Chew, China has repeatedly demonstrated throughout history in a majority of the dynasties that her intentions were largely peaceful and non dominating That is why at the height of all the dynasties during the golden periods, China ships were trading ships and not organised large offensive military convoys. It is based on mutual interest and a win-win mentality. The instinctive response to conflict is to negotiate and create a harmonious solution where both can coexist happily The Great Wall of China was built to keep the barbarians out, which allowed them to pursue civilization and establish education as a leadership criteria since BCE Trump’s and his generals I-can-only-win-if-you-lose mentality is inherited from the war pains of European historical roots centuries upon centuries of fighting till extermination, the sin-penance dynamic, the colonial moralising, dialectic, I-can-do-no-wrong preaching approach is etched into the psyche. The instinctive response to conflict is combative ( that is why the terms used by commentators like WalterP below are physical, like trap, kill, king etc ) . Look at where this inherited high horse colonial combative thinking has gotten Africa over the centuries There is a difference in cultural thinking and approach
Guys, Considering that the Greek influence on Chinese culture is negligible to non existent in both the formative periods and the flourishing periods over the last 2500 years How can one apply only apple grafting techniques only on growing an apple-orange hybrid ? Perhaps Mr Shi Jiangtao can include some Chinese historical parables to encourage harmony and cooperation between the two nations
Guys Are you sure Europe will choose the US side? EU prefer being neutral, however, if forced, we will always choose the side of the victims, not the robber It is very clear who the robber is. China is the silent robber!
I love China but worry that it doesn't understand the situation it is in. Only one of the US's 9 naval groups could eliminate the entire Chinese navy. The Chinese army is woefully under funded and under trained. China's power is completely economic and must use that power because it's military could be defeated easily. China needs to win the world with economic and humanitarian power now only. When it comes to military power China must quietly strengthen and be much meeker until it can actually be a threat. Right now China's military is a growling kitten.U.S is always in war, well train, real training.....so china is meow meow only
. Err O'Brian, that’s a simplistic appraisal of what military confrontations might look like. The blue water naval power of China IS very limited, but near its own shores it is highly likely that the relatively untested but allegedly extremely high-tech anti-ship missiles China boasts would be enough to keep the US at bay in the SCS and the Taiwan Strait. The US would have to focus on strangling the Berring Strait and the Malacca
....Commenting system is still bad. ... The US would have to focus on strangling the Bearing and Malacca Straits but it would take quite a while to see tangible results from such a strategy. We are all better off utterly avoiding war but I would not underestimate China’s military potential, untried though it may be.
Ginger Spice , They have closed many. But those bases are in part what created a world in which ready and safe global trade is available. Is it such a huge surprise that the US would toll the world a bit in exchange for creating an unprecedentedly safe and free ocean?
Those dynasties invaded Vietnam, Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. They were comparatively peaceful, yes. But don’t create a fairytale. And the current regime has very little to do with Imperial China. In the 1970s it tried to destroy the cultural link between it and the past. More than 95% of Beijing’s old temples were destroyed. Excuse us if we don’t think: “gosh, China was a gentle Panda
GoodieTwoShoe,To be asking perfection from China’s history will be as unreasonable as expecting humans to be perfect We should try to create fairytales on earth despite our humanly limitations Your interpretations of the cultural revolution as “destruction”, and yet look what intellectual space that passage of history has freed up for China to progress to what is it today It will be unreasonable to want to have your cake and eat it History often rhymes even though it may not repeat itself exactly Gentleness is a learned behaviour Just as how your spontaneous observation of the cultural revolution was one of destruction
GoodieTwoShoe, I think that China made great efforts to create a positive influence abroad through economic relationships and diplomatic ties. These of course are important factors. But much of this work could be easily damaged by the USA if they don't create an international system of communication. China has to invest in changing the perception of its political image abroad. The US are creating an antichinese sentiment in the whole world. It's very important now for China to be able to stop this media-aggression. For example China has made a great job to stop completely the epidemic in only two months, and this job could be an example for the rest of the world. This could be very good for the image of efficiency of China. Nonetheless now the US are succeeding in reversing the situation putting China in the dock, making people forgetting that Trump is responsible of a disastrous management of the epidemic in his own country. This is possible because the US have a powerful world wide system of communication, that China haven't.
Sadly, the China/US conflict (it seems to be going from cold to hot, due to a group of decisions from the Trump administration) is viewed militarily or through a business lens. Instead, it ought to be viewed as a currency contest. The USD is strong, while the YNY is weak (even pegged to the USD). The US government and it's people can act imperialistically since their currency is strong. The US is instigating Taiwanese independence, Hong Kong revolt, and virtually every other form of cold war strategy to weaken China. China must be reactive and yin due to their inferior position. Yes, they can continue with the yin strategy, growing stronger by the year, but sooner-or-later Washington will blow through some Beijing red line and hostilities will have commence. That is certainly their strategy: make the Dragon fight before it gets too strong. Unfortunately for the US, the currency is being treated like toilet paper, being greatly expanded due to tremendously increased debt. Without a strong USD, the US simply doesn't have the ability to continue with such a yang strategy of antagonism towards China.
Sadly, the China/US conflict (it seems to be going from cold to hot, due to a group of decisions from the Trump administration) is viewed militarily or through a business lens. Instead, it ought to be viewed as a currency contest. The USD is strong, while the renmibi is weak (even pegged to the USD). The US government and it's people can act imperialistically since their currency is strong. The US is instigating Taiwanese independence, Hong Kong revolt, and virtually every other form of cold war strategy to weaken China. China must be reactive and yin due to their inferior position. Yes, they can continue with the yin strategy, growing stronger by the year, but sooner-or-later Washington will blow through some Beijing red line and hostilities will have commence. That is certainly their strategy: make the Dragon fight before it gets too strong. Unfortunately for the US, the currency is being treated like toilet paper, being greatly expanded due to tremendously increased debt. Without a strong USD, the US simply doesn't have the ability to continue with such a yang strategy of antagonism towards China.
China doesn't want to fight US Navy battle groups, it wants to drag the US into an endless war. Chinese winning formula: Time It is preparing a long battle with US that lasts decades if not centuries. Have fun.
why u guys always want to chat none AGES related in page here? come on this is agung counter, non politic issue will effect, change gov won't effect agung export sand deal too~ Ages now can only all the way up, first TP NTA61 soon!
It looks like the Chinese Peoples Congress will have to decide how China carries on in the world stage being in the spotlight of high exposure from the world media, from its Covid 19 actions in Wuhan, to the Huawei Mengzhou issues in Canada, to the seizing and militarization of the Philippine shoals in the South Asian Sea. Having achieved being the reliable chief source of cheaply manufactured goods for the world, China has decided to do a "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere" act by itself by making the South Asian Sea its own lake, stepping on the toes of its US trading partner, and on the heads of small Asian states like Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia while keeping a tight grip on Tibet, Macau, and Hong Kong, and eyeing covetously Taiwan. Listening to some coffee drinkers in the shop, "China need not to go to war with USA, the ChiComParty should just call-in the USA debts and seize the USN carriers and battleships for NON-PAYMENT of outstanding trillions of dollars that US owes to China. But Pres. Trump is a stable genius, so Pres. Xi has to be careful or he could be kicked by a mule, in the face."
What does Sinicization even mean or entail ? u can neither love or fear what you can’t define I wonder if fear of sinicization is just English speaking people’s codeword for fear of Chinese pushback against veiled anti-Chinese racism Trump has been openly promoting veiled anti-Chinese racism To expect the Chinese to take such hateful/divisive propaganda quietly is preposterous The fact that respected English media endorse trump’s statements without calling out this dangerous hateful behaviour is extremely worrying
The Board of Directors of Ageson (“Board”) wishes to announce that Ageson Enterprise Sdn Bhd (formerly known as Esa Pile Sdn Bhd) (“AESB”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, had on 5 June 2020, entered into a JV Agreement (“JV Agreement”) with Bintang Dayang Sdn Bhd ("BDSB") for sand export business ("JV Project") ("Joint Venture").
AESB and BDSB agree to formalize the key terms of a joint venture collaboration and regulate their relationship in the JV Agreement, whereby the Parties shall undertake the project in relation to the sand export business.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Bon Jovi
180 posts
Posted by Bon Jovi > 2020-06-05 11:48 | Report Abuse
Libra?The country is still in a mess with just about everyone involved helping different sides in the uncivil war. Sadly for the USA and its army they lost in Vietnam, although now seem to be mates with the commie leadership. They certainly didn't defeat the terrible