Eddie Ng having connections and the duo having skill and perform. Without EN aldi die half . Now 3 Ng also dont have. Revenue either is dead game or a new game.
Previous auditors were said to be negligent in that they failed to verify with due professional care that the close related transactions ( not done at arm length) were reasonable , justifiable and in compliance with the internal procurement procedural policy and relevant corporate governance. The auditors also failed to ensure that the assets of the company were properly accounted for in the financial report otherwise the purchase /sale of the company car without board resolutions would not have happened. It is believed that a lot of issues were highlighted to justify to remove the auditors. To save their own face, they chose to resign.
It is up to the company whether they want to remove the auditors or sue the auditors depending on the seriousness of the case , quantum of economic loss and benefit and cost consideration The Company has opted for the former. Auditors are at liberty to resign and by the same token, the company is at liberty to remove and /or not to re-engage for another term at the AGM. Before the auditors are removed , it is better for them to resign to save their reputation. No big deal
Auditors need not be permanently engaged. They only serve one term subject to re-appointment at the next AGM. The change of auditors will not have impact on the market confidence and the image of the company. It is a commonplace like the change of lawyers and other professionals. If the Auditors are not up to the job, then change for another one. No big deal.
In the case of Serba ( SD) , the Auditors ( KPMG) highlighted the irregularities found during the conduct of their normal audit, KPMG expected the Top Management of SD to address the said issues but the Mgt turned to deaf ears. Instead of addressing the issues raised within the timeframe ,SD condemned the auditors being difficult as a result of which SD removed and sued KPMG and engaged EY to conduct special audit. Having conducted the special audit, EY established the same facts as KPMG. SD was not pleased and removed and sued EY.
Both Auditors resigned in the above cases. Such audacious and unjustifiable action of the company is believed to have great impact on the market confidence and image of the company. Indeed, the Company has paid a heavy price of no return . The company is doomed to be wound up sooner than you and me could imagine.
In some cases, the Board resolution ( BR) is required but in some cases, the decision could be delegated to the lower level of authority where no BR is required , for instance, purchase of motor bike costing 10k can be approved by CEO without the need for BR.
In the case of RGB, the Company Motor vehicle involved was of " vellfire" which is worth a lot of money . Hence, I find it hard to believe such purchase could be proceeded without BR.
Hong seng, gpacket, revenue, mmag all this con counters under mafia gang the price penniless. Yet no action taken against any of this conmen. Sometimes, Malaysia government talk very loud but end up this kind of conmen still around. Haha
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
joyvest
10,533 posts
Posted by joyvest > 2023-04-03 09:49 | Report Abuse
The 3 Ngs have been laughing at those who have believed them by still holding their shares since RM 2.00....