Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

The disappearance of proper jobs is largely be attributed to the misallocation of public funds, which are squandered on bureaucratic inefficiencies rather than used to drive improvement and enable better services. Significant resources are funneled into "paper mills" within government departments, institutions, and ministries, creating unnecessary bureaucratic positions that add little value to society. This includes hiring "Little Napoleons," petty bureaucrats who enforce excessive and often redundant regulations. Such practices result in an inflated bureaucracy that stifles genuine talent and productivity. Talented professionals are restricted by excessive red tape and bureaucratic obstacles, preventing them from performing efficiently and innovatively. Instead of supporting those who provide excellent services, the bureaucratic system handicaps and suffocates them, leading to frustration and a decline in service quality. The overall effect is a restrictive environment where funds that could foster job creation and economic growth are wasted, pulling back individuals who could otherwise drive significant improvements in public services and the economy. To reverse this trend, public funds need to be redirected towards productive investments and streamlined processes that support rather than hinder talented service providers.

Be the first to like this.

10 comment(s). Last comment by EngineeringProfit 1 month ago

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Guardian Of Faulty System

The use of fundamentalism as a tool to create an illusion of progress and improvement can set in motion a vicious cycle that is detrimental to a nation's socioeconomic health. Here's a detailed argument outlining this cycle:

### Illusion of Progress Through Fundamentalism

1. **Promoting Fundamentalism**: Fundamentalist ideologies often promise a return to traditional values and an idealized past, which can resonate deeply in times of uncertainty or perceived moral decline. Leaders who champion these ideologies claim to bring moral and societal improvements.

2. **Insignificant Progress**: The "progress" promoted by fundamentalism is often superficial, focusing on symbolic changes rather than substantive improvements in quality of life or economic conditions. This can involve strict social policies or public displays of piety that do not translate into actual development.

### Empowering Misuse of Public Funds

3. **Misallocation of Resources**: With public attention focused on religious or ideological purity, scrutiny of financial management wanes. Leaders can divert public funds to projects that support their fundamentalist agenda or enrich themselves and their cronies under the guise of these projects.

4. **Squandering Natural Resources**: The nation's natural resources may be exploited irresponsibly to generate quick revenue that funds these superficial projects. This short-term approach prioritizes immediate gains over sustainable management, leading to long-term economic and environmental degradation.

### Perpetuating Poverty and National Debt

5. **Economic Mismanagement**: Misuse of public funds and irresponsible resource exploitation lead to economic inefficiency and corruption. The lack of genuine economic development initiatives means that poverty persists or worsens, as the benefits of natural resource exploitation are not equitably distributed.

6. **Increasing National Debt**: To maintain the facade of progress and keep the populace placated, the government may take on increasing levels of debt. Loans are used to fund unproductive projects or cover budget shortfalls created by corruption and mismanagement.

### Weakening National Currency

7. **Currency Devaluation**: Persistent economic mismanagement, rising debt levels, and lack of investor confidence result in the devaluation of the national currency. This devaluation further exacerbates poverty as the cost of imports rises, leading to higher prices for goods and services.

### Divide and Divert Attention Through Apartheidism

8. **Social Division**: To maintain control and divert attention from economic failures, leaders may resort to apartheid-like policies, deepening societal divisions based on race, religion, or ethnicity. This divisive strategy ensures that the populace is too preoccupied with infighting to unite against the ruling elite.

9. **Diversion Tactics**: Apartheidism and other forms of social division serve as effective tools to divert public attention from the underlying issues of corruption, economic mismanagement, and poverty. By fostering a climate of fear and mistrust among different groups, the government maintains its grip on power.

### Perpetuation of the Cycle

10. **Cycle Reinforcement**: The continued use of fundamentalism and divisive tactics ensures that the underlying issues of poverty, corruption, and economic mismanagement remain unaddressed. As the economic situation worsens, the government increasingly relies on these same tactics to maintain control, perpetuating the cycle.

In conclusion, the use of fundamentalism to create an illusion of progress enables the misuse of public funds and justifies the squandering of natural resources. This leads to perpetuated poverty, increasing national debt, and a weakened currency. By dividing society through apartheid-like policies, the government diverts attention from its failures, ensuring the continuation of this destructive cycle.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

The disappearance of proper jobs is largely be attributed to the misallocation of public funds, which are squandered on bureaucratic inefficiencies rather than used to drive improvement and enable better services. Significant resources are funneled into "paper mills" within government departments, institutions, and ministries, creating unnecessary bureaucratic positions that add little value to society. This includes hiring "Little Napoleons," petty bureaucrats who enforce excessive and often redundant regulations. Such practices result in an inflated bureaucracy that stifles genuine talent and productivity. Talented professionals are restricted by excessive red tape and bureaucratic obstacles, preventing them from performing efficiently and innovatively. Instead of supporting those who provide excellent services, the bureaucratic system handicaps and suffocates them, leading to frustration and a decline in service quality.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

With more little napoleans, an overabundance of laws and restrictions have several detrimental effects on society:

1. Increased Poverty
"The more laws and restrictions there are, The poorer people become."

Bureaucratic Burden: Excessive regulations can create a heavy bureaucratic burden on individuals and businesses, leading to increased costs and inefficiencies. Small businesses, in particular, may struggle to comply with complex legal requirements, stifling entrepreneurship and economic growth.
Economic Inequality: Overregulation often benefits those who can afford to navigate the legal complexities, usually large corporations and the wealthy, while disadvantaging the poor and small business owners. This exacerbates economic inequality and limits social mobility.
2. Social and Political Unrest
"The sharper men’s weapons, The more trouble in the land."

Militarization and Violence: An environment of stringent laws and heavy-handed enforcement can lead to militarization, where authorities and civilians arm themselves excessively, resulting in increased violence and social unrest.
Oppression and Rebellion: Authoritarian regimes often use strict laws to control and suppress the population. This can lead to resistance and rebellion, as people fight against perceived injustices and oppression.
3. Unintended Consequences of Innovation
"The more ingenious and clever men are, The more strange things happen."

Unforeseen Problems: Highly innovative and clever solutions can sometimes lead to unintended and unpredictable consequences. For example, technological advancements can create new ethical dilemmas, security vulnerabilities, and environmental challenges that existing laws are ill-equipped to handle.
Moral and Ethical Erosion: In a society that overly rewards cleverness and ingenuity, individuals may prioritize personal gain over communal well-being, leading to unethical behavior and a breakdown of social trust.
4. Rise in Crime and Corruption
"The more rules and regulations, The more thieves and robbers."

Criminalization of Minor Offenses: When there are too many rules, even minor infractions become criminalized, leading to an increase in so-called "criminal" behavior. This can overwhelm legal systems and criminalize ordinary citizens for minor or victimless offenses.
Corruption and Bribery: Extensive regulations create more opportunities for corruption and bribery. Officials who have the power to enforce or waive these regulations may exploit their position for personal gain, leading to a more corrupt and unjust society.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

The creation of unnecessary posts for little napoleans in every department, institution and ministry nationwide has bloated the number of civilians, increasing country debt and compromising national competitiveness. While they are corruptible enough in character to make up figures to boost to their their superiors, the downstream continues to suffer spiraling down effects from their existence. With more little napoleans, an overabundance of laws and restrictions have several detrimental effects on society:

1. Increased Poverty
"The more laws and restrictions there are, The poorer people become."

Bureaucratic Burden: Excessive regulations can create a heavy bureaucratic burden on individuals and businesses, leading to increased costs and inefficiencies. Small businesses, in particular, may struggle to comply with complex legal requirements, stifling entrepreneurship and economic growth.
Economic Inequality: Overregulation often benefits those who can afford to navigate the legal complexities, usually large corporations and the wealthy, while disadvantaging the poor and small business owners. This exacerbates economic inequality and limits social mobility.
2. Social and Political Unrest
"The sharper men’s weapons, The more trouble in the land."

Militarization and Violence: An environment of stringent laws and heavy-handed enforcement can lead to militarization, where authorities and civilians arm themselves excessively, resulting in increased violence and social unrest.
Oppression and Rebellion: Authoritarian regimes often use strict laws to control and suppress the population. This can lead to resistance and rebellion, as people fight against perceived injustices and oppression.
3. Unintended Consequences of Innovation
"The more ingenious and clever men are, The more strange things happen."

Unforeseen Problems: Highly innovative and clever solutions can sometimes lead to unintended and unpredictable consequences. For example, technological advancements can create new ethical dilemmas, security vulnerabilities, and environmental challenges that existing laws are ill-equipped to handle.
Moral and Ethical Erosion: In a society that overly rewards cleverness and ingenuity, individuals may prioritize personal gain over communal well-being, leading to unethical behavior and a breakdown of social trust.
4. Rise in Crime and Corruption
"The more rules and regulations, The more thieves and robbers."

Criminalization of Minor Offenses: When there are too many rules, even minor infractions become criminalized, leading to an increase in so-called "criminal" behavior. This can overwhelm legal systems and criminalize ordinary citizens for minor or victimless offenses.
Corruption and Bribery: Extensive regulations create more opportunities for corruption and bribery. Officials who have the power to enforce or waive these regulations may exploit their position for personal gain, leading to a more corrupt and unjust society.

DickyMe

14,705 posts

Posted by DickyMe > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Some linked companies have multiple departments with overlapping duties.
They have Senior Manager, Manager, Chief Exec, 1st and 2nd Executive, Officers 1, 2, 3 and lastly the low level worker. This is the structure of some glcs.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Certainly. I heard some schools, hospitals or institutions have 3-4 deputy heads!!!

Posted by DickyMe > 25 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Some linked companies have multiple departments with overlapping duties.
They have Senior Manager, Manager, Chief Exec, 1st and 2nd Executive, Officers 1, 2, 3 and lastly the low level worker. This is the structure of some glcs.

Posted by eastern_joy > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Wow, not surprising, 10 people do the talking, 1 Bangla do the hard work... :D

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Yes, I saw a supervisor standing and watching the bangla mopped the floor of the building. And when I talked to the "watcher", she told be she got supervisor above her- sitting in the office. And when I went to the office to meet the manager in charge of cleanliness, I was asked to see the supervisor's supervisor first......This went on and and I never got to meet the top guy to complain that the floor is still dirty despite his bloated team- bloated with yes men little napoleans who reported as though everything is going on very well!????

DickyMe

14,705 posts

Posted by DickyMe > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Robin Hood

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

In the healthcare sector, "little Napoleonism" refers to the undue influence and control exerted by third-party administrators (TPAs) and bureaucratic entities over clinical operations. This phenomenon has severe repercussions for both healthcare providers and patients. Key grievances include unfair fee structures, delayed payments, complex administrative processes, and unilateral decision-making by TPAs, all of which undermine the quality and accessibility of patient care.

Post a Comment
Market Buzz