KUALA LUMPUR: Shares of AIRASIA Group Bhd rose to a high of RM1.25 in afternoon trade on Thursday as investors took heart from comments by the Prime Minister over the low-cost carrier's business deals.
At 2.37pm, its share price was up seven sen to RM1.23. There were 65.66 million shares done at prices ranging from RM1.17 to RM1.25.
The 30-stock FBM KLCI rose 10.88 points or 0.71% to 1,547.67. Turnover was 1.82 billion shares valued at RM1.10bil. There were 541 gainers, 261 losers and 331 counters unchanged.
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said on Thursday it was normal to ask for an “offset” in business dealings provided the money is not taken for personal use.
Even the government, when making purchases for equipment, would ask for an offset.
“For instance, when we buy planes we will ask for an offset.
“Whether you consider an offset as bribery, it is up to you, ” he told reporters after a session with Education Ministry staff on Thursday (Feb 6).
He questioned why an offset should not be accepted when making a purchase on a high-priced item.
“But if the money received is pocketed, then that is corruption, ” he pointed out.
The Prime Minister was commenting on media reports over allegations of corruption involving AirAsia and Airbus.
It was reported that Airbus will pay a series of record-breaking settlements including nearly €1bil to the United Kingdom’s Serious Fraud Office after admitting to “endemic” levels of bribery across its international business.
Legal documents attached to the settlement revealed Airbus paying hundreds of millions ringgit to sponsor a sports team linked to two unnamed executives described as “key decision makers” at AirAsia and AirAsiaX, but unrelated to the airline business.
AirAsia Group rejected allegations of wrongdoing after reports cited legal documents showing Airbus paid US$50mil and offered US$55mil more, to sponsor a sports team linked to the two AirAsia and AIRASIA X executives.
On Feb 4, AirAsia Group said its founders Datuk Kamarudin Meranun and Tan Sri Tony Fernandes have relinquished their executive posts as the budget carrier forms a committee to review the allegations against them.
Kamarudin is the airline’s executive chairman and Fernandes its chief executive officer.
AirAsia’s top executives have claimed that the company was never reached out to even once by the UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO) during the four-year investigation regarding the Airbus scandal, for any explanation or clarification.
Kamarudin and Fernandes said it was a clear violation of the fundamental legal principle of fairness and access to justice.
“We categorically deny all allegations of wrongdoing or misconduct on our part as executives and directors of AirAsia, ” they said.
They said that Caterham F1, the company alleged to have been sponsored improperly by Airbus, was at the relevant time a Formula 1 Racing team that had gone round the globe promoting among others AirAsia, AirAsia X, GE and Airbus.
Throughout the period Kamarudin and Fernandes were shareholders in Caterham, the company made no profits and was eventually disposed of in 2014, as from start to finish it was a branding exercise and not a venture to make profits.
“So as to facilitate a full and independent inquiry by AirAsia, we are relinquishing our executive roles with immediate effect for an initial period of two months which may be extended at the discretion of the AirAsia board as they deem fit based on the prevailing circumstances then.
“At the request of the board of AirAsia, we have agreed to continue to assist AirAsia in an advisory capacity as and when required, ” they added.
Chart | Stock Name | Last | Change | Volume |
---|
Created by Tan KW | Dec 26, 2024
Created by Tan KW | Dec 26, 2024
Created by Tan KW | Dec 26, 2024
Created by Tan KW | Dec 26, 2024
Look at the cost they incur for buying the planes from Airbus below:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AirAsia
On June 2011 AirAsia ordered 200 Airbus A320neos at the Paris Air Show.[67][68] The planes were originally due to become available in 2015, and the deal was one of the largest ever for commercial aircraft in a single order.[67] The deal was worth US$18 billion at list prices, although AirAsia will have obtained a substantial discount from those prices. The deal makes AirAsia Airbus' single biggest customer.
On 13 December 2012, AirAsia placed an order for an additional 100 Airbus A320 jets, splitting it between 64 A320neo and 36 A320ceo.[70] At the Farnborough International Air Show in 2016, Air Asia ordered 100 A321neos at an estimated cost of US$12.6 Billion dollars at list prices.
Air Asia plans to fly these larger aircraft to airports that have infrastructure constraints.[72] AirAsia received its first A320neo In September 2016.
With this, the total number of orders that AirAsia had placed for the Airbus A320 family had gone up to 575, reaffirming the carrier's position as the largest airline customer for the Airbus single aisle product line.[73]
(1) WHAT AIRBUS GAINS?
.......................
say Airbus hikes their margin by 0.5% by bribing TF and KM with US$ 50M:
Airbus cost of 300 Units: US$ 18B + US$ 12.6B = US$ 30.6B
Airbus gain:
= 0.5% x US$ 30.6 B
= RM 650 Million
Net Airbus gain:
= RM 650 Million - RM 200 M (bribery)
= RM 450 Milliom
(2) WHAT TF & KM GAINED?
.........................
What TF & KM gained from bribery of US$ 50M:
= RM 200 M
loss in AA with combined stake of 32%:
= 32% x 650 Million (cost hike)
= RM 210,000
Net gain by TF & KM:
= 200 - 210
= - 10 Million
...................
From the above, i cannot see any logic even if 100% of the bribery amount of 200 M went into their pocket...
will Airbus just for the sake RM 450M gain bribe RM 200M?
If Airbus benefited more by hiking more on their planes price....TF & KM will definitely suffer greater loss...
I hope the above rational, logical argument sinks to everyone's head.
=========================================================
2020-02-07 00:34
Posted by probability > Feb 7, 2020 12:27 AM | Report Abuse X
you guys still talking rubbish like bapuks liao.....
Airbus sold 575 planes to AA...do you know what is the value or not?
thats US$ 50 Billion.
.....................
what is US$ 50 Million vs US$ 50 Billion?
Thats exactly same like you treat your customer (4 or 5 people from the same company) for a RM 1000 lunch at a good chinese restraunt for an RM 1 Million order they placed for your product.
Its just damn 0.1% treat of the value of the product sold....
I used to have it every new year with my supplier. It develops good relationship and understanding for even negotiating the price when placing order
2020-02-07 00:35
lizi
crazy...no hope
2020-02-06 19:38