1. Defining the Crime:
Theft and Corruption:
In faith jurisprudence, theft (sarqa) traditionally involves the unlawful taking of someone else's property. Hudud punishment, such as hand amputation, is prescribed as a severe deterrent.
Corruption, particularly when it involves the misuse of public office or resources for personal gain, is indeed a form of theft. Corruption takers are, in essence, stealing from the public, often harming the community more severely than petty theft.

2. Severity of Corruption:
Impact on Society:
Economic Harm: Corruption deprives the society of resources meant for public welfare, leading to poverty, inequality, and underdevelopment. In many cases, the amount involved in corruption far exceeds that of typical theft.

Moral Degradation: Corruption undermines trust in public institutions, leading to a breakdown in social and moral order. It breeds injustice, as the corrupt enrich themselves at the expense of the needy.
Widespread Consequences: While theft may affect one or a few individuals, corruption can negatively impact entire communities, or even a nation, by diverting funds from critical services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

3. Parallels with Theft in fatih Law:
Breach of Trust (Amanah):
Both theft and corruption involve a betrayal of trust. In theft, the thief betrays the trust of the individual or society by unlawfully taking what does not belong to them. Similarly, a corrupt official or individual betrays the public trust by misappropriating resources or accepting bribes.

Fatih Principle: The holy book condemns the betrayal of trust, which is at the heart of both theft and corruption. Applying hudud punishment for corruption would be seen as upholding the principle of amanah (trust) and justice.

4. Deterrence and Justice:
Deterrence:

The hudud punishment for theft is intended to serve as a powerful deterrent. Given the often devastating effects of corruption on society, applying similar punishments could serve as a strong deterrent against this crime.

Public Accountability: Severe punishments for corruption could reinforce the notion that those in positions of power are accountable to the public and must uphold the highest ethical standards.

Justice:
Equality Before the Law: In faith, all individuals are equal before the law, regardless of status. If a poor thief can have their hand amputated, why should a wealthy or powerful individual who commits an even greater theft (through corruption) be treated differently?
Restoring Balance: Hudud punishments are designed to restore balance in society. Corruption disrupts this balance on a large scale, and severe punishment could be a way to restore justice and fairness.

5. Historical and Legal Precedents:
Application of Hudud:
While traditional hudud punishments have primarily been applied to theft and adultery, Faith jurisprudence allows for adaptability in applying the law to ensure justice and the welfare of the community (maslahah).
Examples in History: There are instances where rulers took severe actions against corrupt officials, including public humiliation and harsh punishments, to maintain justice and order.

6. Ethical Considerations:
Moral Responsibility:
Those entrusted with public office or resources have a greater moral responsibility. When they engage in corruption, they are betraying not just individuals but entire communities, making their crime particularly egregious.

Faith teachings emphasize justice, honesty, and the protection of public interests. Applying hudud punishments for corruption aligns with these ethical principles by upholding justice and protecting society from harm.

Hand amputation hudud punishment, traditionally associated with theft, should be applied to corruption takers involves delving into the principles of faith law, ethics, and societal needs.

Weakening of Social Cohesion: As individuals become increasingly disillusioned with their work and personal lives, social cohesion begins to erode. The sense of community and shared purpose diminishes, leading to a fragmented society where trust in institutions and each other is weakened.

Loss of Innovation and Dynamism: Centralized systems that prioritize control over creativity stifle innovation. When workers are forced to adhere strictly to bureaucratic procedures, there is little room for experimentation and new ideas, leading to stagnation in both the public and private sectors

Societal Implications: A declining birth rate has broader societal implications, including an aging population and a shrinking workforce, which can further strain social services and economic systems. As fewer young people enter the workforce, the burden on the remaining workers increases, perpetuating the cycle of stress and dissatisfaction.

Economic Insecurity and Decision-Making: The stress and instability caused by a centralized, bureaucratic work environment can also discourage people from starting families. Economic insecurity, coupled with the fear of being unable to provide a stable environment for children, leads many couples to delay or forgo having children altogether​

Strain on Relationships and Family Life: The stress and frustration from work often affect personal relationships. Workers may become emotionally unavailable or physically absent, leading to strained marriages and higher divorce rates. The inability to spend quality time with family due to work pressures exacerbates these issues, weakening family bonds.

Stress and Poor Work-Life Balance: The stress induced by excessive bureaucracy and centralized control often spills over into personal lives. Long hours, constant scrutiny, and the pressure to comply with ever-changing regulations can lead to poor work-life balance, contributing to mental health issues such as anxiety and depression​ .

Diminished Work Quality and Morale: The constant need to navigate through bureaucratic red tape can lead to burnout and a decline in morale. Workers spend more time dealing with administrative hurdles than focusing on their core tasks, leading to lower quality work and a disengaged workforce.

Proliferation of Red Tape: As centralization increases, so does the proliferation of rules and regulations, often enforced by mid-level bureaucrats who may lack the authority to make significant decisions but wield enough power to obstruct progress. These "little Napoleons" create unnecessary obstacles that slow down work processes, increase frustration among workers, and lead to a culture of compliance rather than innovation​.

The over-centralization of authority often results in inefficient processes where decisions take longer to implement, and local nuances are ignored. This can lead to a one-size-fits-all approach that fails to address specific needs, resulting in poorer outcomes. For example, in a highly centralized healthcare system, decisions made by distant bureaucrats may not reflect the realities on the ground, leading to subpar healthcare delivery​

Centralization and Micromanagement: As organizations and governments centralize control, decision-making power is often removed from local entities and individuals. This can lead to a culture of micromanagement, where workers feel their autonomy is stripped away, diminishing their motivation and engagement. When employees lack control over their work, job satisfaction plummets, leading to poorer performance and lower productivity

The increasing centralization of control and the proliferation of bureaucratic red tape can lead to a cascading series of negative effects on society, ultimately degrading the quality of life for workers, straining personal relationships, and contributing to declining birth rates.

Spiraling Down and Societal Degradation Due to Centralization, Bureaucracy, and Red Tape

The current system may not sufficiently promote a mindset of lifelong learning. As knowledge and technology evolve, students need to be prepared for continuous self-improvement and skill development beyond their formal education. The existing blueprint might not adequately foster this mindset.

Curricular Rigidity: There is serious rigidity in the curriculum that does not easily accommodate the integration of new subjects or teaching methods. This rigidity can hinder the incorporation of modern skills and knowledge areas that are increasingly important in today’s world.

The revolutionary change in the role of schools should involve a fundamental shift from delivering fixed knowledge to equipping students with essential skills for the information age. By focusing on critical thinking, information literacy, and practical application, schools can better prepare students for both academic success and real-world challenges, ensuring they are equipped to thrive in a dynamic and complex world.

Personalizing Learning: Traditional education often follows a one-size-fits-all approach. In contrast, the information age allows for more personalized learning experiences. Schools should leverage technology and data to tailor education to individual students' needs, interests, and learning styles. This personalization can make learning more relevant and engaging for each student.

Preparing for a Dynamic Workforce: The modern job market demands more than just knowledge—it requires the ability to adapt and apply that knowledge in various contexts. Schools should prepare students for this reality by focusing on skills like collaboration, creativity, and digital literacy. By fostering these skills, schools can help students become more versatile and capable in a rapidly changing work environment.

Shifting focus from rote memorization to Fostering Critical Thinking: As information becomes more accessible, the ability to think critically about it becomes increasingly important. Schools should prioritize teaching students how to question assumptions, evaluate arguments, and understand different perspectives. This not only helps students make informed decisions but also prepares them to engage thoughtfully in a diverse and complex world.

Adapting to Bad, Fake and Delusional Information Overload: The internet provides access to more information than ever before, but it also requires new skills to manage and make sense of it all. Schools need to teach students how to navigate this overload by focusing on how to search for relevant information, evaluate its credibility, and synthesize it into meaningful insights. This shift prepares students for a world where being able to manage and make use of vast amounts of data is crucial.

From 3M to ALP: From Knowledge Delivery to Skill Development: Traditionally, schools have been primarily focused on delivering a fixed body of knowledge. However, in the information age, the sheer volume and rapid evolution of knowledge make this model outdated. Schools should shift towards developing critical skills such as information literacy, problem-solving, and adaptability. By emphasizing these skills, schools can prepare students to not only absorb information but also to critically analyze and use it effectively.

The Changing Role Of Schools: Tthe role of education should evolve to reflect the new realities of the information age. By focusing on critical thinking and information literacy, we can equip students with the skills they need to navigate the vast and complex world of information, ensuring they are well-prepared for both academic and real-world challenges.

Critical Thinking Over Memorization: In the past, education often emphasized rote memorization of facts. However, in a world where information is constantly changing and expanding, memorization alone is insufficient. Critical thinking skills enable students to analyze, interpret, and question information, which is essential for navigating today’s complex and often contradictory information landscape. By prioritizing critical thinking, education can prepare students to handle ambiguity and make informed decisions.

The job market has evolved, with new industries and roles emerging that didn’t exist a few decades ago. Traditional curricula often emphasize subjects and skills that are less relevant in today’s economy. Modern education needs to be more flexible and responsive to these changes, incorporating skills like entrepreneurship, digital fluency, and interdisciplinary knowledge.

The internet has revolutionized how we access and consume information. In the past, education was about transferring a fixed set of knowledge. Today, with information readily available online, the role of education should shift from merely delivering facts to teaching students how to find, evaluate, and apply information effectively. This requires a focus on critical thinking and information literacy rather than rote memorization.

The rapid pace of technological innovation has transformed nearly every aspect of our lives. Traditional education systems often lag behind in integrating modern technology into the curriculum. In the new millennium, educational tools and methods must embrace digital literacy, coding, and the use of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence and virtual reality to prepare students for the future workforce.

while traditional education methods have served well in the past, the needs and expectations of the new millennium require a significant overhaul. Embracing technological advancements, addressing diverse learning styles, and focusing on relevant skills can create a more effective and future-ready education system.

While the initial use of substances may be driven by the desire to feel better or to overcome feelings of inadequacy or low mood, the long-term consequences often include addiction, physical dependence, and a further deterioration of mental health. What starts as an attempt to correct an imbalance or fulfill an evolutionary drive for reward and satisfaction ends up creating a much more serious problem.

Dopamine: Many addictive substances directly stimulate dopamine release, creating a powerful sense of reward. Over time, the brain's natural dopamine production is diminished, leading to dependence on the substance for pleasure and motivation.
Serotonin: Drugs like MDMA (ecstasy) cause massive releases of serotonin, leading to intense feelings of well-being and connection. However, this can deplete serotonin levels and lead to a crash, which may drive repeated use.
Endorphins: Opiates and alcohol mimic the effects of natural endorphins, leading to pain relief and euphoria. Chronic use can lead to reduced natural endorphin production, increasing reliance on the substance.

The problem with using substances to self-medicate is that while they provide temporary relief, they also alter the brain's chemistry over time. As the brain becomes accustomed to the heightened levels of neurotransmitters, it begins to reduce its own production of these chemicals, leading to tolerance. This means that more of the substance is needed to achieve the same effect, creating a vicious cycle that can lead to addiction.

Alcohol, drugs, and other addictive substances provide a quick and potent way to stimulate the brain's reward system. These substances artificially elevate levels of neurotransmitters like dopamine, serotonin, and endorphins, which temporarily alleviate feelings of depression or dissatisfaction. For individuals whose mood set points are low, these substances might seem like an effective way to self-treat their mood disorders.

Humans are biologically wired to seek out activities that stimulate the brain's reward system. In the past, this drive was met through exploration, social bonding, physical activity, and other behaviors that enhanced survival and well-being. However, in modern society, many people face environments that do not naturally provide these kinds of stimulating experiences. This mismatch between our evolved needs and the modern world can lead to feelings of boredom, restlessness, or low mood.

Understanding brain to war against substance abuse

ROE> 20 and profit margin almost 70%? Betul?

If so, can go 2.00 or not?

Fatality rate about 1 in 20?

Fair PE would be 15-25?

It's spreading via sexual transmission. Condom doesn't prevent infection.

Posted by leno > 4 hours ago | Report Abuse

mpox is like syphilis and hiv ... where got people wear glove on penis ? If u worri ... then must quickly go buy condom counter.

Sailang kah?

Fundamentalism, in particular, thrives on the notion of purity—whether moral, ideological, or belief system—implying that any alternative perspectives are inherently corrupt or dangerous. This creates an environment where curiosity is not just discouraged but actively suppressed. The fear of transgressing these boundaries can lead individuals to self-censor their thoughts and inquiries, reinforcing a cycle where curiosity is seen as a threat to stability and order.

They establish rigid frameworks of belief that leave little room for questioning or exploration. These approaches are designed to create a sense of certainty and obedience, often by promoting a singular worldview that is deemed absolute and non-negotiable. This singularity of thought discourages the natural human inclination to inquire, doubt, or seek out new knowledge, as any deviation from the established dogma is often met with social ostracism, guilt, or even punishment.

Indoctrination and fundamentalism are the most effective, powerful, popular and acceptable killers of curiosity. They extinguish curiosity by creating an environment where questioning is dangerous, critical thinking is suppressed, and exploration is limited. They replace the natural human desire to learn and grow with a forced conformity that values obedience over discovery. As a result, curiosity, the driving force behind innovation and understanding, is effectively extinguished.

By extinguishing curiosity, leaders can redirect the focus of the youth towards more controlled or superficial areas, such as fakeducation that does not encourage critical thinking. This way, the young population remains distracted and less likely to challenge the underlying issues that are causing their country to underperform.

By extinguishing curiosity, leaders can redirect the focus of the youth towards more controlled or superficial areas, such as fakeducation that does not encourage critical thinking. This way, the young population remains distracted and less likely to challenge the underlying issues that are causing their country to underperform.

In a country where leadership is corrupt and the nation's wealth is being siphoned by those in power, encouraging curiosity among the youth is a threat to authority. For example, curious young minds would start asking uncomfortable questions about why their country is lagging behind its neighbors, like Singapore, which could lead to social unrest and demands for accountability. By stifling curiosity, leaders can maintain their grip on power without being challenged.

If young people begin to ask why their country isn't performing as well as others, such as world top performing Singapore, they might start to compare the two nations critically. This comparison could expose the failings of the leadership and the systemic corruption that impoverishes the nation. To prevent these comparisons, discouraging curiosity ensures that the youth remain unaware of alternative models of governance and success, thus preventing any potential questioning of their own country’s failures.

In a country plagued by corruption, the leadership may argue that maintaining social stability is more important than fostering curiosity. If young people begin to question their nation's direction, it could lead to social upheaval, protests, or even revolution. Leaders might claim that extinguishing curiosity is necessary to prevent chaos and keep society functioning, even if that society is morbidly and irrationally deluded.

By extinguishing curiosity, leaders can redirect the focus of the youth towards more controlled or superficial areas, such as fakeducation that does not encourage critical thinking. This way, the young population remains distracted and less likely to challenge the underlying issues that are causing their country to underperform.

In essence, from the perspective of corrupt leaders, extinguishing curiosity is a tool to maintain power, avoid uncomfortable questions, and ensure that the youth do not become agents of change. While this approach might preserve the current system, it ultimately comes at the cost of progress, innovation, and the nation’s long-term prosperity.