Mr. Naim:[Gravely] Tragic indeed, Mrs. Hannah. Imagine a world where every young person has an opinion. No, no. Much better if they follow the tried and true path. We’ve been doing this for centuries - even before IR4.0 or artificial intelligence etc; why fix what isn’t broken?

Mrs. Hannah:[Feigning shock] Oh no! Chaos? You mean... people thinking for themselves, developing opinions, improving the world around them? What a tragedy!

Mr. Naim:[Laughing heartily] Contribute to society? We contribute by being devout, by maintaining the order of things. If we start encouraging this “critical thinking” nonsense, we’ll end up with a society full of... chaos!

Mr. Naim:[Laughing heartily] Contribute to society? We contribute by being devout, by maintaining the order of things. If we start encouraging this “critical thinking” nonsense, we’ll end up with a society full of... chaos!

Mrs. Hannah:[Raising an eyebrow] Well, maybe if they questioned the syllabus, they wouldn’t question the heavens so much. Instead of turning every challenge into a test of faith, they could actually solve problems in their lives and contribute to the prosperity of our society.

Mr. Naim:[Leaning forward] That’s the beauty of it, Mrs. Hannah. Faith doesn’t require “why”—it simply requires obedience. We teach them not to question. Otherwise, where would it end? Today they question the syllabus, tomorrow they’ll question the existence of heaven.

Mrs. Hannah:[Sighing] What could be more astray than keeping them trapped in a cycle of ignorance? We can't just teach them to follow without knowing why they're following. The world would not wait for them to 'grow' up

Mr. Naim: Exactly! It’s not about whether they study, it’s about what they study. Do we really want to fill their heads with ideas that could lead them astray?

Mrs. Hannah:[Sarcastic] Ah, yes, “fleeting matters.” Things like literacy rates, maternal health, and girls being allowed to study... insignificant details in the grand scheme, I’m sure.

Mr. Naim: Accountability! That's what I always say. [Pauses] Except when it comes to the divine plan. We’re accountable to the Higher Power, not to fleeting worldly matters like “gender equality” and “modern education.”

Mrs. Hannah:[Smiling knowingly] Well, Mr. Naim, maybe that's not such a bad thing. A little accountability never hurt anyone.

Mr. Naim: Leaders? What kind of leaders do we need other than those who are humble servants of the faith? Do we really need children questioning everything? Before you know it, they'll be questioning us! For example, they might ask why we need unity and divisive ministers at the same time? And who is higher in hierachy?

Mrs. Hannah:[Hesitantly] I understand the value of tradition, Mr. Naim, but children should also learn to ask questions, to think critically. It's how we develop leaders, problem-solvers... future ministers, even!

Mr. Naim: Innovators?[He raises an eyebrow] The only innovation they need is the innovation of devotion! Imagine a world where all they need is the wisdom from ancient texts. What’s more innovative than that? Why, if our children can recite every line, they’ll never need to question anything ever again.

Mrs. Hannah:[Nods] Of course, spirituality is important, but we must also equip them with practical skills for this world. They need to be thinkers, problem solvers, innovators—

Mr. Naim:[Chuckling softly] Ah, Mrs. Hannah, always thinking about the "future." But, I must remind you, what’s more important than preparing their souls for the Hereafter?

Mrs. Hannah (Women & Children):[Smiling politely] Mr. Naim, thank you for taking the time to meet. I’m very eager to discuss how we can better prepare our children for the future. Education reform, perhaps? More critical thinking in the curriculum?

What are police waiting for? Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (Act 588): If the offense was documented or shared electronically (e.g., through social media), the Communications and Multimedia Act must also apply, especially Section 233 (which relates to improper use of network facilities). Individuals or institutions found to be hiding or spreading information about such crimes through electronic means could be fined up to RM50,000 or imprisoned for up to 1 year, or both.

Prevention Is better than cure. Avoiding Unintended Consequences: Many policies, though beneficial on the surface, may have unintended consequences that could fuel racial disparities or tensions. The Unity Ministry, with its dedicated focus on national cohesion, is well-positioned to detect these potential outcomes. By involving this ministry in the early stages, Malaysia can avoid costly mistakes that may have long-term negative implications for interracial relationships.

Constitutional Protection of Other Languages: The Constitution explicitly allows for the use and teaching of non-Malay languages, which implies that individuals have the right to converse in their mother tongues. Any claim that restricts this right contradicts the very spirit of Article 152, which aims to balance the primacy of the Malay language with the protection of linguistic diversity.

Clearly, substances that cause harm to the body and mind are discouraged or deemed haram. Given the scientific evidence linking excessive sugar consumption to severe health problems, it could be argued that sugar fits this criterion. By classifying sugar as haram, Malaysia would align its health policies with Islamic ethical principles that prioritize the well-being of its citizens. There is no two ways about it.

Clearly, substances that cause harm to the body and mind are discouraged or deemed haram. Given the scientific evidence linking excessive sugar consumption to severe health problems, it could be argued that sugar fits this criterion. By classifying sugar as haram, Malaysia would align its health policies with Islamic ethical principles that prioritize the well-being of its citizens.

Unity Minister: Absolutely. And nothing fosters peace quite like reminding people of how threatening their neighbors’ cultures and beliefs are. Keep them scared, keep them divided, and voilà! Eternal stability! (To be continued)

Religious Affairs Minister: I knew you’d understand. It’s not about division, really—it’s about control. A united nation under one faith, one culture. It’s the only way to maintain peace!

Unity Minister: Brilliant! I mean, who needs mutual respect or understanding when we can just enforce conformity? Harmony through homogenization—that’s what we should be teaching the children.

Religious Affairs Minister: Precisely! And think of the spiritual rewards. We’re not just ruling, we’re saving souls! By insisting on one way, we’re sparing the masses from the confusion of choice.

Unity Minister: Oh, I get it. After all, who needs diversity of thought or belief? It’s so much easier to manage a nation when everyone is forced into a neat little box. A single narrative is just so… efficient!

Religious Affairs Minister: Exactly! If we let everyone think they can worship freely or live how they please, where would that leave us? Chaos, that’s where! We must guide them all—firmly. It’s for their own good, you see.

Unity Minister: Of course, of course! What better way to unite the people than by pointing out how different and inferior some of them are, right? Nothing says "unity" like reminding others where they don’t belong.

Religious Affairs Minister: Why, thank you. It’s all about protecting the sanctity of our faith, you know. We must stand firm against outside influences and those who dare question our authority.

Unity Minister: Ah, Minister! What a fine day to divide the nation further! You’ve really outdone yourself this time. That last speech? Masterful! You managed to alienate half the population without even breaking a sweat!

Conflicting, contradicting and wasting of public fund

Violation of Article 10 (Freedom of Speech and Expression): Article 10 of the Federal Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression. Language is a crucial form of expression, and restricting individuals from speaking in their mother tongue undermines this fundamental right.

Promoting Inclusivity & Prevention of Controversial/Provoking Announcement: Screening by the Unity Ministry ensures that all new policies and proposals are inclusive and do not disproportionately favor one group over another. This prevents alienation of minority communities and builds a sense of belonging. Policies vetted through the lens of unity would promote equality and respect for all races, reinforcing Malaysia's ethos of "Keluarga Malaysia" (Malaysian Family).

The claim that Chinese and Indian Malaysians conversing in their mother tongues causes distrust in the Malay community violates several legal and constitutional provisions. It contravenes **Articles 8, 10, and 152** of the Federal Constitution, which guarantee equality, freedom of expression, and protection of linguistic diversity. Additionally, such a claim could be seen as **inciting racial tension**, violating provisions under the **Penal Code and the Sedition Act**. Finally, the statement contradicts the spirit of the **Rukun Negara**, which emphasizes national unity and respect for Malaysia's diverse cultural and linguistic heritage.

Symbol of Pluralism and Progress: Establishing a new department like JAKSIM, separate from JAKIM, would signal to the world that Malaysia is serious about promoting pluralism and spiritual unity. It would show that the nation values the spiritual needs of all its citizens, regardless of faith, and is committed to moving forward in a way that respects the diversity of its people.

5% should be the magic number

For alcohol, how many percent Some traditional fermented food with less than 5% should be arguable ok, right?

Education: Providing children with a broad, balanced education helps them develop critical thinking skills. This includes teaching them to analyze information, question assumptions, and understand diverse perspectives.

Protecting the children - all similar naive, innocent and vulnerable: There is no trust more sacred than the one the world holds with children. There is no duty more important than ensuring that their rights are respected, that their welfare is protected, that their lives are free from fear and want and that they can grow up in peace; and that their rationality and sensibility are protected.

Irrationality can stem from a sense of moral superiority, where fundamentalists believe their beliefs are the only correct ones. This can create echo chambers where only reinforcing views are accepted, leading to groupthink and resistance to critical thinking.

Haramkan terus je. Waiting for more obesity, diabetes, heart problem, cancer and knee and spine damages to happen? Nothing more addictive and harmful than sugar (except digital devices and social media)

Preventive Measures: The haram status of tobacco in Malaysia serves as a preventive measure to protect individuals from harm. Similarly, restricting sugar could serve as a preventive measure against the onset of chronic diseases. By categorizing sugar as haram, individuals would be discouraged from excessive consumption, leading to improved overall health and reduced healthcare costs.

Public Health Burden: Tobacco’s classification as haram reflects the need to mitigate its impact on public health. Sugar, too, contributes to a substantial public health burden, straining healthcare systems with the rising costs associated with treating sugar-related illnesses. Addressing sugar in a similar manner could alleviate this strain and promote a healthier society.

Health Impacts: Just as tobacco is deemed haram due to its severe health consequences, including cancer and cardiovascular diseases, sugar poses significant health risks. Excessive sugar consumption is linked to numerous health issues, including diabetes, obesity, and heart disease. The detrimental effects of sugar on public health are well-documented and parallel the health concerns associated with tobacco.

Sugar. Time for whose head to roll. Sleeping on their jobs, makan gaji buta for ages, yet - still sugar intake is undeniably a primary driver of Malaysia’s diabesity epidemic. The excessive consumption of sugar-laden foods and beverages is fueling a rise in obesity, diabetes, and related metabolic disorders.

Sleeping on their jobs, makan gaji buta for ages, yet - still sugar intake is undeniably a primary driver of Malaysia’s diabesity epidemic. The excessive consumption of sugar-laden foods and beverages is fueling a rise in obesity, diabetes, and related metabolic disorders.

Sugar intake is linked to increased risks of heart disease, stroke, and early death. High sugar consumption can lead to insulin resistance, high blood pressure, and inflammation, all of which contribute to cardiovascular complications. This is especially critical given that cardiovascular disease remains one of the leading causes of death in Malaysia.

In Islam, any behavior or substance that causes widespread harm to the community (*ummah*) is discouraged. Sugar, as a leading cause of these chronic diseases, burdens not only individuals but also the healthcare system, causing suffering and economic strain. By reducing or eliminating sugar consumption, Malaysia could reduce the incidence of these diseases, saving lives and reducing healthcare costs. The Islamic concept of *maslahah* (public interest) supports the idea of prioritizing actions that benefit the collective well-being of society.

Malaysia faces a growing epidemic of obesity and diabetes, with sugar being a major contributor. According to statistics, Malaysia has one of the highest rates of diabetes in Asia, largely driven by the overconsumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed foods. Obesity, in turn, increases the risk of other metabolic diseases, including cardiovascular problems, hypertension, and even certain cancers.