As you last predicted Mycron's PAT for Q1/3/17 would be RM18.9 mil but actual was RM7.3 mil, why do you think as an outsider, you can calculate Hengyuan's Q2 with such precision?
Not right to consider 100% of inventory are made up of only crude oil. We are not sure the ratio of crude oil and the end product but definitely not 100%.
you have a point, but you can assume a margin value (X) to add to the crude price and fix a ratio (y) between the crude and products, and yet you will derive exactly the same stock loss value above.
This can be mathematically shown, but not presented on the above article in order not to confuse the readers.
Posted by Jeffbkt > Aug 11, 2017 10:22 PM | Report Abuse
Not right to consider 100% of inventory are made up of only crude oil. We are not sure the ratio of crude oil and the end product but definitely not 100%.
End product margin definitely will not follow the decrease rate of crude oil price. Anyway, you can use the previous quarter which has the stock/inventory loss to prove your calculation is correct.
Fix the barrels of Crude and Product out of the 4700k barrels say 50/50.
using your reference crude oil price and refining margins at the concern starting month end ending month end you can calculate the total value of the inventory (including crude + products) respectively at both periods.
Their difference in value is the stock loss/gain.
It would be exactly the same as above if there is no change in refining margin between the reporting period above and if there is indeed a change say by 1 USD/brl drop in margins from 9USD/brl to 8USD/brl as per article above, you have to reduce the end value of the products fraction accordingly.
This will result with a greater stock loss than calculated above.
Posted by Jeffbkt > Aug 11, 2017 10:33 PM | Report Abuse
End product margin definitely will not follow the decrease rate of crude oil price. Anyway, you can use the previous quarter which has the stock/inventory loss to prove your calculation is correct.
i reread your article. i think you covered that. so inventory loss is a temporary phenomenon to be offset in next quarter. It means Q2 so-so, Q3 huat, right? =)
Posted by Alex Foo > Aug 11, 2017 11:05 PM | Report Abuse
i reread your article. i think you covered that. so inventory loss is a temporary phenomenon to be offset in next quarter. It means Q2 so-so, Q3 huat, right? =)
But most report I read suggest very minimal impact from stock inventory loss! Even petron Corp report speedo confirm that. I guess, similar to hengyuan as well. Simply calculate and jump into conclusion it will be big loss is not responsible
Good works! the results, basis & calculations are there. Any one challenge the basis using another basis? Look forward to read more debates or calculations.
Don't come out & just say my friend lah, my grandfather lah or even my calculator. These are jokes, not basis.
This is misleading calculation, especially for the value stock inventory, the price you put in is just estimation, if this is the case, better put the same price, say USD53/barrel, the stock inventory no impact at all!
IF STOCKHOLDINGS IS JUST 40 DAYS... AND IF ON FIFO.... THE VALUE OF INVENTORY... FOR CALCULATING STOCK LOSS... SHOULD BE ROLLED BACK TO JUST 22 MAY 17 LOH... NOT 1 MAR 17 MAH
Investment is an art...its much depend on how you look at the business, estimation of the profit etc. Anything could happen pre-Q2 announcement.
2 groups of people here. One group i.e OTB, KYY, paper, Icon8888, Venfx, David, LA777, myself etc confident with HYC because of crack spread all time high & another group of people estimate below average result for Q2.
Just cross the fingure and wait for the announcement day. Cheers!!
Above article datas are biased.....................
HRC main product is gasoline, why use jet fuel kerosene futures to substantiate your figures..............
Why use 26th June Brent crude prices when 30th June is the month end and is on Friday, a trading day. The pricing differential is already nearly USD 3 per barrel for that few days of trading.
Got to go back to work, will work out the details later.....but for sincere investors, please double check the data and don't follow blindly.
Whatever it is, the inventory as at reporting quarter will depend on oil pricing and the inventory valuation gain/loss will definitely affected the bottom line and also the stock price too.
Thanks for highlighting the issue.........consider a fair view minus the calculations.
Just to add to vinc3362 comments on usage of Brent price on 26 June, if you really want to use 26 June, then it should be compared to 27 March price (26 March is a weekend) to be consistent, which is about USD51. Hence, the difference would still be smaller by USD2 (stock losses would be less).
Inventory loss is common and should be the same for all oil refining operations. The question we should be asking the past 2 quarters how much was the 'extra-ordinary gain on inventory'.
Obviously we cant just take crack spread and use this as the only input for profitability.
Super investor if you ask me, would have bought in cheap when HengYuan first reporting their Q4 turnaround profit of 200m+. Knowingly that there are not much shares in circulation, this is the best down to pare down some holdings when there is volume.
Q2 inventory loss can be recovered in q3? Nobody can guarantee. How well the crude oil will perform in Aug & Sept still unknown. And nobody knows which day exactly HRC place order for crude. Buy high sell low is very likely, everythg depends on how good are HRC crude experts. Also, pls take note HRC has no hedging as of today. For inventory loss, u may go through Shell previous reports, it is possible inventory loss can wipe out all your margin when crude up/down tremendously. It is not as simple as just minus crude price at end of the mth/qtr with early of the mth/qtr. Anyway, counting down remaining +/-10 trading days for Q2. Good lucks!
Why hold 40 day stock ? Are they preparing for refinery maintenance or inspection ? Petron corp philipines shutdown 45 days for the maintenance ? Just suggesting.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
swiftwind
56 posts
Posted by swiftwind > 2017-08-11 22:08 | Report Abuse
Thank you for sharing. This is a balanced view. The numbers seem to check out. Perhaps David or Probability may share their views on this.