It will be very strange if FundMyHome actually allows the home to be refinanced through itself at the end of year 5. If they do so, they will immediately incur a loss of 20% of the value of the home. Where did you get the info that they will actually allow that?
You can imagine the transaction to be as follows: 1. The homes are initially sold at 20% discount through bulk purchase by the FundMyHome investors. 2. The homes are later resold to buyers at 100% of the original price. 3. FundMyHome which holds the 20% difference, pays it out slowly to the investors over 5 years.
The 20% discount from the developer is used to pay out the 5% return to the investors. If FundMyHome allows the buyer to refinance their home back to FundMyHome, someone will have to fork out another 20% to be paid to the next batch of investors. I sure hope it won't be the home buyers.
Dear siesing, The house belong to FundMyhome and at the end of 5 year the house is open for resale first priority given to buyer to purchase the house from FundMyhome or by public auction. This time the real buyer needs to get bank finance and all payment is to FundMyhome. The FundMyhome then use this sum to pay out to Developer, Buyer and Investor as per pre-agreed format. The FundMyhome will make a lot of profit from the 20% collected at the beginning of 5 years. If FundMyhome invest this 20% capital that yield 5% yearly return and pay yearly 5% of 80% to investor this is 4% at the end of 5 year FundMyHome will still have (20% + 5x1% - 4%x5)=5% of total house sales. Imagine is the total sales is in Billions how much a 5% worth?
If this p2p financing for Fund My Home is viable, USA & other developed countries long ago alredi implement it. Do you think Msia is more genius than USA?
If this p2p financing for Fund My Home is viable, USA & other developed countries long ago alredi implement it. Do you think Msia is more genius than USA? ===========
a good scientist works from first principles....and if it is fair to all stake holders, why not give it a try.? I say it is fair to all stakeholders.
ps....if house prices actually go up at the end of 5 years, this p2p homeowner will wish he took a traditional mortgage and make a lot more money through gearing and 100% equity. Much like a guy bought a share and the share went up a lot, he will wished he sailang and margin and all the share........
For the first 5 years, The investor enjoy 5% return (assume 5% fixed for all type of houses) The buyer enjoy the right to stay or rent out.
If you are really interested to be the investor, my opinion is to select the property with big freehold land, the bigger the better, go for detached, semi-D, and forget about the high rise condo or apartment.
If you are really interested to be the buyer, my opinion is to select the property with small shared leasehold land, the smaller the better, go for very high condo and apartment, and forget about the landed property.
If this p2p financing for Fund My Home is viable, USA & other developed countries long ago alredi implement it. Do you think Msia is more genius than USA? 06/11/2018 09:14
by i3gambler > Nov 6, 2018 10:09 AM | Report Abuse
If you are really interested to be the investor, my opinion is to select the property with big freehold land, the bigger the better, go for detached, semi-D, and forget about the high rise condo or apartment.
If you are really interested to be the buyer, my opinion is to select the property with small shared leasehold land, the smaller the better, go for very high condo and apartment, and forget about the landed property. ===========
so...let market forces work...that is the magic of market forces to meet in the middle.....
I am aware there are already p2p schemes with similar terms as long as 5 years ago during the property bull market....but there are unregulated and therefore risky...
now, they bring it to the open and regulated world.
Why can't modified a bit this 5 years P2P? Adding in another 5 years extension option for buyer till they are ready-to fully committed to 100% own the house. any comment?
qqq3, They can fine tune the structure for different type of houses, for example:
1) Type A: Buyer get free stay, Investor get 5.0% 2) Type B: Buyer get free stay plus 0.5%, Investor get 4.5% 3) Type C: Buyer get free stay plus 1.0%, Investor get 4.0%
Coupled with govt. amnesty till June 2019 for undeclared income with 10-15% penalty, this will further boost of liquidity into our banking system, and property market as a whole. LGE scered big point this time actually. wakaka
If take traditional loan, no need put 20% up front. Just 10% will do. Those taking traditional loan also can sell after 5 years. Without having to share profit.
20% down payment is because it’s pretty high risk of default in nature,(learning fr other country’s experience. )
Posted by qqq3 > Nov 6, 2018 03:17 PM | Report Abuse
this platform is for everyone.... anyone can oarticipate
5 yrs lead time is to buy time? So that the NINJA ( no income, no job, no asset) category can do better by then and qualify for traditional loan (80% outstanding)? If they still don’t qualify for the loan, they will hv to sell. That’s the main worry.
Let say your son has just started working as an executive and earn 2500 a month. He wanted to buy a house of 300K, the bank will ask him to fly kite if he apply for a loan.
Now, you can afford to give him 60K, so he joint the FundMyHome scheme.
For the next 5 years, he stay in the new house for free, may be also rent out one or two rooms, and that meaning he can save more.
By end of the 5 years period, he could be already a senior executive earning 5000 a month.
Anyway, I am not encouraging anybody for this scheme.
By then how sure r v economy will turn out that well with this type of national debt, budget, current share market, and property market?
Anyway, if he is already earning an income, I would ask him to apply for RUMAWIP using traditional loan. These houses even cheaper compared to those offering by fundmyhome.
Actually, if he cannot qualify for a normal loan he better not take a loan. If he already big boy yet cannot stand on his own 2 feet, need old man to sponsor, He not my son. Like banker,will also ask him to fly kite!
Any scheme is suitable only for certain group of people.
And this scheme is for first time house buyer only, targeting the young one which currently earning low pay but probably have great chance to earn much higher pay in 5 years time.
If you are already 40 years old and now earn 2500, it is less likely that you will earn much higher 5 years later.
one caveat....in the early stages , only unsold units from not so hot projects will be listed. Projects selling like hot cakes and second hand homes are not listed....until some one finds a way to make it more lucrative to investors and developers without the 20% retention sum ......
I understand, at least initially, the 80% portion will be funded by banks/ institutions. Will this cause systematic risk like in Lehman case?
The answer is No....as there is no gearing, this is not a derivative, the first 20% loss in taken up by the buyers. It is a very safe form of investment for investors. No downside but can participate in the upside.
For the buyer...he can stay there without installments/ rentals.....and can participate in the upside. Whatever money he contribute becomes equity in this house.
1). I suspect the initial 20% can be in the form of housing loan as well. As long as Bank and the Institution can sort out ownership agreement, approval of housing loan is likely. Term of the loan however, should not be more than 5 years.
2). The deal is good for a house buyer only under the following conditions : 2a). The house buyer is currently renting. By moving to this, he is essentially on a rent-to-own scheme. 2b). The house buyer is not looking for capital appreciation, but a genuine house owner who would like to own the house after 5 years.
3). For a genuine house owner, you will not care if the price went down.
4). If the price went up at the end of 5 years, going for a bank loan would be easier with 20% paid. Some may argue that at the end of 5 years, if price goes up, house buyer would need to fork out an even bigger amount. Then again owning 20% is better than owning none.
5). If the price went up beyond affordability, sell the 20% stake and move to a cheaper house. The home owner get 5 years free stay and all the money back. How nice.!
The plan is very innovative. What I feel pathetic about is that our MOF and PM run out of ideas and need to stole the thunder of a Business man. Maybe Tong Kooi Ong should be appointed as Minister of Finance instead.
Chonghai, This is not Gomen project. Private project. Just that now Gomen need not build 1m affordable homes. Private developers will now help out to make the number.
Too many assumptions what if this and that...talk until so long...only I know if buyer not even dare to commit to buy with 20% loan for his own stay if he qualifies...no point of talking what happen 5 yrs later. I know one day for sure he/she will end up either renting other ppl home for life or sleep on d street. If d attitude is right, get a roof top 1st then stable down, start doing proper financial planning for the next 5 yrs to come. Otherwise, u will be poor for next of your life.
Yes, Calvintaneng, u got it so right! Come la, ride ur bike( bike lane toll free soon) to Msia come invest in Msian properties n cars! Plenty of ready stocks! Sure huat! That’s PH promise to u! ;)
ciku, no cure for stupidity...but PH got innovative cure for the smart and hardworking........5 years no instalment.....means people got spending power...and good for economy.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
siesing
1 posts
Posted by siesing > 2018-11-06 04:45 | Report Abuse
It will be very strange if FundMyHome actually allows the home to be refinanced through itself at the end of year 5. If they do so, they will immediately incur a loss of 20% of the value of the home. Where did you get the info that they will actually allow that?
You can imagine the transaction to be as follows:
1. The homes are initially sold at 20% discount through bulk purchase by the FundMyHome investors.
2. The homes are later resold to buyers at 100% of the original price.
3. FundMyHome which holds the 20% difference, pays it out slowly to the investors over 5 years.
The 20% discount from the developer is used to pay out the 5% return to the investors.
If FundMyHome allows the buyer to refinance their home back to FundMyHome, someone will have to fork out another 20% to be paid to the next batch of investors. I sure hope it won't be the home buyers.