1. Diesel at 46% yield, cracks USD 46.5/bbl 2. Jet fuel at 7% yield, cracks USD 36.0/bb 3. Gasoline Mogas 95 at 35% yield, cracks USD (0.79 + 3.71) / bbl 4. Rest of product yield at 12%, using Mogas 95 cracks USD 4.50/bbl
Gross refining margin:
= (0.46 x 46.5 ) + (0.07 x 36.0) + (0.35 x 4.5)+ (0.12 x 4.5) = 21.39 + 2.52 + 1.57 + 0.54 = US $ 26.02 / brl .................
Gross Profit at above derived present refining margin
= (10.7 million barrel sales per qtr) x ( US $26.0/brl) x (MYR 4.45/USD) = 1.238 Billion MYR ...................
If there is still derivative loss for Diesel above, we can expect derivative gain for Gasoline. It would be certainly fair to assume that it can only be gain (as HY hedged at USD 12/brl for gasoline) and at the minimum it would be fair to assume zero hedging loss/gain.
Using worst scenario,
the PBT would be: = 1.138 Billion MYR
PAT would be: = 853 Million MYR, EPS = 2.84 for Q3 ..................
accounting cash flow hedge loss of Q2 at 244 million
the PBT would be: = 894 Billion MYR
PAT would be: = 670 Million MYR, EPS = 2.23 for Q3 ( still exceeding Q2) ...................
Remember however that the above is assuming ZERO crack of gasoline for July & Aug which had passed, with only another month left for Q3 results to be secured. So it can't be far out from above.
It would be reflective of Q4 you can say at current margin.
The conman KYY once mentioned that HY will not make more profit because there is no price increase for petrol and diesel. See what kind of profit HY generated in Q2! Senile conman KYY try to ‘find bone in the egg’.
You have to give KYY credit this time. He got it right here. Promoters can continue to hoodwink newbies but I can assure you the profit reported earlier cannot be sustained. Scr3w me if I am wrong in my prediction for next quarter and I am not going to curse anyone.
Already highlighted to U...Hengyuan people cannot be trusted,,,,still refuse to accept ah ? The most question for those people who invest in hengyuan is to ask whether the derivative executed are actually a faked device to siphon money from the company loh ?
The most danger question is the hedging instrument is completely unrelated to business hedging but it is a device instrument to siphon money from hengyuan loh!
The red flags can be seen by;
1. Many qtr of hedging losses loh! 2. Very suspicious long dated of the hedging instrument loh! 3. Extremely large hedging value has been contracted mah! 4. Extremely Huge hedging losses incurred todate loh!
If the above suspicion is proven true.....then hengyuan will eventually be worthless just like Serba loh!
Posted by probability > 43 seconds ago | Report Abuse
well said Zhuge..
this people like raider is the root cause many valuable people like Rabbit2 dont come to i3 often
jaks and sendai are kyy favorite counters at a certain point in time........................................ride it well as I do make money..............ride it wrong lose money, what more to say?
Stockraider, Do you understand what I try to explain below on refining margin swap contracts?
If you use only Mogas92 crack spread: USD 31.58 Equation: V x A=226,945,000 or V=226,945,000/A V x (31.58 – A) = 1,490,267,000/4.397
226,945,000 x (31.58 – A) = 338,928,133 x A 7,166,923,100= (338,928,113 + 226,945,000) x A A= 7,166,923,100/565,873,133 A= 12.665 V=226,945,000/12.665 V= 17,918,718
What I trying to say in above example are: Volume of outstanding refining margin swap contract is 17,918,718 barrels Average outstanding refining margin hedged is USD 12.665 per barrel And the spot refining mogas92 margin on 30/6/2022 is USD 31.58 per barrel
Hence your outstanging 17,918,718 at your average refining hedged at USD 12.665 per barrel will recorded a mark to market (as on 30/6/2022 is USD 31.58 per barrel) fair value loss/unrealised loss of 17,918,718 x (31.58- 12.665) = USD 1,490,267,000/4.398.
If you assume at the end of Q3, 6 million barrels mature and average realised refining margin in Q3 is USD 16 per barrel and at 30/9/2022 the spot Mogas92 refining margin is USD 10
Thus your loss on this 6 million barrels mature refining margin swap contracts USD 6 million x (16- 12.765) But your physical gross profit is USD 6 million X 16. Hence your net gross profit is USD 6 million X [ 16 + (12.765 - 16) ] = USD 6 million X 12.765. The acceptable margin per barrel when HRC make this refining margin swap at USD 12.765.
And your balance refining margin swap (17,918,718 - 6,000,000) barrel mark to market (as on 30/9/2022 spot Mogas92 refining margin USD 10 per barrel) fair value gain is USD 11,918,718 x (12.765 -10). Note once the spot refining margin drop below your hedge refining margin of USD 12.765 your outstanding refining margin swap contracts will have mark to market fair value gain
As 6 million mature on Q3 HRC might have enter another X million barrel refining margin swap at USD Y per barrel acceptable to HRC
But raider highlight this red flags...it is unlikely due to coincidence loh!
1. Many qtr of hedging losses loh! 2. Very suspicious long dated of the hedging instrument loh! 3. Extremely large hedging value has been contracted mah! 4. Extremely Huge hedging losses incurred todate loh!
If the above suspicion is proven true.....then hengyuan will eventually be worthless just like Serba loh!
Posted by Sslee > 2 minutes ago | Report Abuse
Stockraider, Do you understand what I try to explain below on refining margin swap contracts?
If you use only Mogas92 crack spread: USD 31.58 Equation: V x A=226,945,000 or V=226,945,000/A V x (31.58 – A) = 1,490,267,000/4.397
226,945,000 x (31.58 – A) = 338,928,133 x A 7,166,923,100= (338,928,113 + 226,945,000) x A A= 7,166,923,100/565,873,133 A= 12.665 V=226,945,000/12.665 V= 17,918,718
What I trying to say in above example are: Volume of outstanding refining margin swap contract is 17,918,718 barrels Average outstanding refining margin hedged is USD 12.665 per barrel And the spot refining mogas92 margin on 30/6/2022 is USD 31.58 per barrel
Hence your outstanging 17,918,718 at your average refining hedged at USD 12.665 per barrel will recorded a mark to market (as on 30/6/2022 is USD 31.58 per barrel) fair value loss/unrealised loss of 17,918,718 x (31.58- 12.665) = USD 1,490,267,000/4.398.
If you assume at the end of Q3, 6 million barrels mature and average realised refining margin in Q3 is USD 16 per barrel and at 30/9/2022 the spot Mogas92 refining margin is USD 10
Thus your loss on this 6 million barrels mature refining margin swap contracts USD 6 million x (16- 12.765) But your physical gross profit is USD 6 million X 16. Hence your net gross profit is USD 6 million X [ 16 + (12.765 - 16) ] = USD 6 million X 12.765. The acceptable margin per barrel when HRC make this refining margin swap at USD 12.765.
And your balance refining margin swap (17,918,718 - 6,000,000) barrel mark to market (as on 30/9/2022 spot Mogas92 refining margin USD 10 per barrel) fair value gain is USD 11,918,718 x (12.765 -10). Note once the spot refining margin drop below your hedge refining margin of USD 12.765 your outstanding refining margin swap contracts will have mark to market fair value gain
As 6 million mature on Q3 HRC might have enter another X million barrel refining margin swap at USD Y per barrel acceptable to HRC
Stockraider, If you check HRC 2020 financial account when covid cause mogas92 to negative HRC actually make realised Fair value gain on derivative financial instruments of RM 1,124,316,000.
"Notice that Petron Eps attributable to shareholders & Petron comprehensive income to shareholders are the same bcos Petron treat Hedging gain & loss must flow thru the P&L which is the rightful treatment loh! Petron reported a positive position after flowing thru its hedging losses to the P&L top line, this should be what hedging operation should be all about by smoothing out its profitability but not in hengyuan case with losses run into billions ?"
There is no justfication Hengyuan valuation should be supported due to wrongful reporting of its profit & huge losses of its derivative mah!
Let Raider summarised hengyuan position loh!
1.HRC Q2 for 30-6-2022 2. HRC 6mts 30-6-2022
1a.Profit/{loss} attributable to shareholder............Rm 667m 1b. Profit/{loss? comprehensive to shareholder...Rm {412}m number of shares Rm 300m 1a. Eps Rm 2.22 1b Eps Rm {1.37}
Culmulative 6m 2a, Profit attributable to shareholders..... Rm 714m 2b. Profit comprehensive income shareholders Rm (475m}
2a, EPS Rm Rm 2.38 2b. Eps Rm {1.58}
Notice that Petron Eps attributable to shareholders & Petron comprehensive income to shareholders are the same bcos Petron treat Hedging gain & loss must flow thru the P&L which is the rightful treatment loh! Petron reported a positive position after flowing thru its hedging losses to the P&L top line, this should be what hedging operation should be all about by smoothing out its profitability but not in hengyuan case with losses run into billions ?
But hengyuan do not loh! It keep the hedging loss as no impact to EPS loh!
If we standardised the treatment like Petron....Hengyuan will be reporting huge losses loh!
Rightfully Hedging losses should flow thru P&L mah!
Thus Hengyuan performance appear very bad compare to Petron loh!
The most danger question is the hedging instrument is completely unrelated to business hedging but it is a device instrument to siphon money from hengyuan loh!
The red flags can be seen by;
1. Many qtr of hedging losses loh! 2. Very suspicious long dated of the hedging instrument loh! 3. Extremely large hedging value has been contracted mah! 4. Extremely Huge hedging losses incurred todate loh!
If the above suspicion is proven true.....then hengyuan will eventually be worthless just like Serba loh!
The point is Hengyuan has Rm 2.8 billion loan to deal with besides the more than the Rm 1 billion in losses mah!
Posted by qqq3333 > 44 seconds ago | Report Abuse
sslee...............hedging gains, if any ,will not drive HY higher than fair value ..................... professionals are interested in its fair value of the sustainable operations.................................................................................. and when things turn south, it never rains but it pours...............die lo.
A potential kon....is a worthless to investors loh! Just leave hengyuan alone mah! Sell b4 too late loh!
Posted by qqq3333 > 16 seconds ago | Report Abuse
but I disagree HY will be worthless ......................... HY still serve its corporate interest , except the corporate interest may not be minority shareholders in Malaysia. ............... in China those teapot refineries like HY are subject to a lot of controls so it makes sense for them to have a refinery in Malaysia ............. and can service China when necessary.
I think corporate interest is more about serving China then about share price or minority share holders. ................ and transfer pricing is surely a major consistent problem.
If siphoning money is true to my suspicion....then it will be bankrupted loh!
What obligation to shell if bankrupted leh ?
Lu tau boh ?
osted by qqq3333 > 43 minutes ago | Report Abuse
Posted by stockraider > 5 minutes ago | Report Abuse
The point is Hengyuan has Rm 2.8 billion loan to deal with besides the more than the Rm 1 billion in losses mah!
========
HY is not at bankrupcy risk, at least not yet .............................. but HY still got a lot of obligations to Shell /malaysian government to upgrade its facilities.
sslee....................... people say crack spread negative, u jump in to buy HY.., even if small sums, ....................what were u thinking? just doesn't make sense.
I just point out the fact, if refining margin become negative HRC can just stop all the physical buying crude, refine it and selling the finished product to prevent physical negative margin (assume negative USD 2 per barrel)
And at the quarter end just report Zero revenues and purchased and PBT included refining margin derivative gain of: USD Volume x hedge refining margin of [A - (-2 average physical margin for the quarter). = USD V x (A+2) If V is 6 million barrel A is USD 15 per barrel = USD 6,000,000 x 17 = USD 102,000,000 = USD
Posted by stockraider > 49 minutes ago | Report Abuse
If siphoning money is true to my suspicion....then it will be bankrupted loh!
What obligation to shell if bankrupted leh ?
Lu tau boh ?
osted by qqq3333 > 43 minutes ago | Report Abuse
Posted by stockraider > 5 minutes ago | Report Abuse
The point is Hengyuan has Rm 2.8 billion loan to deal with besides the more than the Rm 1 billion in losses mah!
Posted by Sslee > 45 seconds ago | Report Abuse
sslee....................... people say crack spread negative, u jump in to buy HY.., even if small sums, ....................what were u thinking? just doesn't make sense.
I just point out the fact, if refining margin become negative HRC can just stop all the physical buying crude, refine it and selling the finished product to prevent physical negative margin (assume negative USD 2 per barrel)
And at the quarter end just report Zero revenues and purchased and PBT included refining margin derivative gain of: USD Volume x hedge refining margin of [A - (-2 average physical margin for the quarter). = USD V x (A+2) If V is 6 million barrel A is USD 15 per barrel = USD 6,000,000 x 17 = USD 102,000,000 = USD
Stockraider if HRC wanted to con you they can just siphon out realised fair value gain on derivative financial instruments of RM 1,124,316,000 in year 2020
They already started siphoning mah....from gain of Rm 1.1b....now it is a loss of more than Rm 1.1b mah!
Do u know....more than Rm 2.2b....has just disappear ah from 2020 to 2022 todate now leh ?
Posted by Sslee > 1 minute ago | Report Abuse
Stockraider if HRC wanted to con you they can just siphon out realised fair value gain on derivative financial instruments of RM 1,124,316,000 in year 2020
Sslee and probability, Do not waste your time here. KYY did not do his homework well. Hence he lost a lot of money in KLSE in last 2 years. He simply talked without facts and figures. He never learn any skill in KLSE, still the same outdated rules.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
probability
14,500 posts
Posted by probability > 2022-09-02 19:57 | Report Abuse
HY Complex refinery margin update - 1/09/22 (with gasoline at almost zero crack)
.................
Diesel: https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NYMEX-GOC1!/
Jet Fuel: https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NYMEX-ASD1!/
Gasoline Mogas 92: https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NYMEX-D1N1%21/
Gasoline Mogas 95 premium: https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NYMEX-SMU1!/
From above:
1. Diesel at 46% yield, cracks USD 46.5/bbl
2. Jet fuel at 7% yield, cracks USD 36.0/bb
3. Gasoline Mogas 95 at 35% yield, cracks USD (0.79 + 3.71) / bbl
4. Rest of product yield at 12%, using Mogas 95 cracks USD 4.50/bbl
Gross refining margin:
= (0.46 x 46.5 ) + (0.07 x 36.0) + (0.35 x 4.5)+ (0.12 x 4.5)
= 21.39 + 2.52 + 1.57 + 0.54
= US $ 26.02 / brl
.................
Gross Profit at above derived present refining margin
= (10.7 million barrel sales per qtr) x ( US $26.0/brl) x (MYR 4.45/USD)
= 1.238 Billion MYR
...................
If there is still derivative loss for Diesel above, we can expect derivative gain for Gasoline. It would be certainly fair to assume that it can only be gain (as HY hedged at USD 12/brl for gasoline) and at the minimum it would be fair to assume zero hedging loss/gain.
Using worst scenario,
the PBT would be:
= 1.138 Billion MYR
PAT would be: = 853 Million MYR, EPS = 2.84 for Q3
..................
accounting cash flow hedge loss of Q2 at 244 million
the PBT would be:
= 894 Billion MYR
PAT would be: = 670 Million MYR, EPS = 2.23 for Q3 ( still exceeding Q2)
...................