bernama.com https://www.bernama.com › news Cement prices continued to climb in December 2022 -- DOSM 9 Jan 2023 — -- The unit price index of cement rose 1.5 per cent in December 2022 from November 2022, marking the second consecutive month of increase, ...
Malay Mail https://www.malaymail.com › news Report: Cement prices up 30pc since Oct, yet to come down 6 Dec 2022 — Citing several industry players, the Malay daily reported that the average 50kg bag of cement jumped 30 per cent
GlobeNewswire https://www.globenewswire.com › ... Global Cement Market to Hit Sales of $459 Billion by 2028 | 23 Nov 2022 — Global cement market was valued at USD 323.24 Billion in 2021, and it is expected to reach a value of USD 459.06 Billion by 2028, ...
Global Cement https://www.globalcement.com › Pri... Displaying items by tag: Prices In the US market, the company's cement volumes increased by 5.6% in 2021, with a 5.1% rise in concrete sales. Prices in
5:05PM MCEMENT MICHAEL YEOH SOCK SIONG (15,000,000 units Transacted) Wednesday, 22 Feb 2023 5:39PM MCEMENT YOOGALINGAM A/L VYRAMUTTU (1,000,000 units Transacted) 5:39PM MCEMENT ASMAT BIN KAMALUDIN (1,000,000 units Transacted) Tuesday, 21 Feb 2023 5:02PM MCEMENT YEOH SEOK KIAN (15,000,000 units Transacted) Monday, 20 Feb 2023 5:26PM MCEMENT YEOH SEOK HONG (15,000,000 units Transacted) 5:26PM MCEMENT YEOH SOO KENG (15,000,000 units Transacted) 5:26PM MCEMENT FRANCIS YEOH SOCK PING (15,000,000 units Transacted) Monday, 13 Feb 2023 5:06PM MCEMENT YEOH KHOON CHENG (1,000,000 units Transacted) Thursday, 9 Feb 2023 5:28PM MCEMENT TAN GUAN CHEONG (1,000,000 units Transacted)
The Acquisition continues to bolster profitability and value enhancement. The effectiveness and efficiency of the Group’s cement operations and ability to deliver seamless solutions to customers will be optimised, boding well for the positive growth and outlook of the Group and the industry going forward. In addition, the Langkawi Plant is well positioned to capitalise on the continuing healthy demand from the export market.
retained earnings RM400mil++++++++++ boleh bayar dividen tak terhingga :)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION - continued
Unaudited As at Audited As at 31.12.2022 30.06.2022 RM’000 RM’000 EQUITY Share capital 5,345,817 5,345,817 Reserves: Foreign currency translation reserve 37,110 33,032 Fair value reserve 3,373 3,373 Retained earnings 409,124 392,912 Equity attributable to owners of the parent 5,795,424 5,775,134 Non-controlling interests 3,815 3,793 TOTAL EQUITY 5,799,239 5,778,927
LIABILITIES
Non-current liabilities Lease liabilities 32,317 36,587 Borrowings 2,828,738 2,986,526 Deferred tax liabilities 71,094 85,258 Post-employment benefit obligations 21,936 21,734 2,954,085 3,130,105 Current liabilities Trade and other payables 754,084 650,073 Contract liabilities 2,055 3,055 Amount due to holding companies 4,464 4,397 Amount due to related companies 20,296 19,304 Lease liabilities 15,627 18,799 Borrowings 935,114 813,614 Post-employment benefit obligations 1,737 2,422 Income tax liabilities 8,891 4,586 1,742,268 1,516,250 TOTAL LIABILITIES 4,696,353 4,646,355 TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 10,495,592 10,425,282 Net assets per share (RM) 4.42 4.41
tunai dari operasi ~RM90juta, hebat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE FINANCIAL PERIOD ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2022
6 Months Ended 31.12.2022 31.12.2021 RM’000 RM’000 Cash Flows From Operating Activities Profit before tax 28,444 47,073 Adjustments for:- Amortisation of intangible assets 1,066 1,065 Depreciation of: - investment properties 2 2 - property, plant and equipment 120,995 95,148 - right-of-use assets 9,899 10,148 Dividend income (4) (180) Interest expense 96,671 57,278 Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment (net) (642) (2,179) Gain on termination of leases (net) (1) - Interest income (6,195) (3,095) Property, plant and equipment written off 607 37 Provision for inventory obsolescence (net) 300 1,080 Provision for retirement benefit 473 460 Reversal of impairment loss on receivables (net) (67) (9,870) Share of results of joint venture (20,907) (20,305) Unrealised gain on foreign exchange (net) (2,372) (2,511) Operating profit before changes in working capital 228,269 174,151 Changes in working capital:- Inventories (16,289) (15,947) Receivables (27,099) (61,102) Other assets (28,886) (36,326) Payables 103,923 21,083 Contract liabilities (1,000) (985) Related parties balances (56,126) 120,577 Cash generated from operations 202,792 201,451 Interest paid (89,881) (87,323) Interest received 6,003 3,095 Retirement benefit paid (271) (794) Income tax paid (net) (29,189) (19,697) Net cash generated from operating activities 89,454 96,732
The Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2022 and the accompanying explanatory notes attached to the interim financial statements.
Exactly how much MCement can earn this quarter, I don't know. But looking at the parameters, I expect MCement to report a record quarterly EBITDA and profit.
Hume made how much profit in its latest qtr? RM15m or so? MCement will easily beat that by 7x.
With increased pace in property construction, and assuming more infrastructure projects are rolled out in 1-2 year time, what is your estimate of a sustainable revenue level, margin and valuation of MCement?
Looking back at Lafarge Malaysia history, annual revenue reached ~RM2.8 billion during the boom time of 2012-14. PBT margin was as high as 18% (in 2013).
After acquiring YTL Cement assets, capacity should have been expanded further. Rawang plant has been closed for upgrade. Once completed, it should become a more efficient plant.
On the valuation side, we have to account for the 467m ICPS issued when acquiring YTL Cement assets.
I'm trying to get an idea of what a full valuation will look like. Any idea?
@Observatory, first on the 467m ICPS, I think I have included this into the enlarged share base of 1,310 million shares. I double checked that MCement share base was 853m in 2020, so total share base has expanded by 457m, a little short of the 467m you stated.
I am not sure of the discrepancy. You may have more details.
As for projections of revenue and profits going forward, it is not easy. To be honest I have got it wrong twice, both occasions on the cost side.
MCement achieved revenue of RM990m in the latest Q3 2023 and gross profit of RM277m (gross profit margin of 28%). If annualised, MCement may achieve revenue of RM4.0 billion a year.
But this can change easily, depending on the coal prices and bulk cement selling prices going forward. I would expect gross profit margin to expand in next Q4 after the assumed forward hedges at higher coal prices wind down.
However, over long term, I think the current margin of 28% can sustain or at slightly higher level of 30% when demand improves. So on a sustainable basis, I would expect gross profit of RM300m per quarter and RM1.2 billion per year. Minus out depreciation charges, interest expenses and other overhead that total RM750-800m a year, profit before tax can maintain at around RM400-450 million a year.
Cashflows will be higher at RM650-700m a year after adding back depreciation charges. Capex is usually less than RM50m a year, so free cashflows may hit RM650m a year or 50 sen a share. Assuming a 60% payout, dividend payments may top 30 sen a share, which values the stock at RM4.28 at 7% yield.
I refer to quarterly report Note B13 (i) and (ii), wt. avg number of ordinary shares is 1,310m. ICPS 467m. The fully diluted share base = 1,310m + 467m = 1,777m.
Yes, it's difficult to project future revenue and profit for such cyclical industry with highly variable cost, volume and ASP.
One simple approach I used is to assume that, in the long run, the business will at least earns its cost of capital, and shareholders earn their cost of equity. Price to book should be at least 1 time. The latest equity attraibutable to owner is RM5,870m. Divided by 1,777m (assumed all ICPS converted), net asset per share = RM3.30. So I assume RM3.3 is a conservative estimate for the long term share price.
However, when acquiring from Lafarge, and again when injecting assets into Malaycan Cement, YTL valued it at RM3.75 per share. Maybe they're confident to generate synergy and to create more values from the enlarged business.
Another approach is to use asset replacement cost. I once read in a HLIB report that replacement cost is USD100 per metric ton of capacity. I failed to find other sources that confirm their assumption. Let's assume they're right. HLIB put the current capacity at 23.84m Ton. Therefore the enterprise value = 23.84m * USD100 * 4.6 (exchange rate) = RM10,966m Fair market cap = EV (10,966m) - non controlling interest (4m) - debt (3,519m) + cash (474m) = RM7,921m Dividend by 1,777m shares, value per share = RM4.46
Based on above methods, the long run value I got is between RM3.3 to RM4.5 (but your value is lower at RM3.13 if divided by 1,777m shares)
"We believe attaching a 50% discount to 10 year P/B mean is justified considering: (i) structurally lower infra spending (vs the past) and (ii) heavy carbon emitting business"
"Our TP is derived based on fully diluted target P/B multiple of 0.87x based on c.50% discount to 10 year P/B average (implies -1SD to 10 year mean)"
Apologies, I made a mistake in the above cashflow calculations. I need to deduct projected tax payments estimated at RM140m a year, so free cashflows may come to RM510 million a year, still able to support dividend payouts of 30 sen a share. (excluding ICPS which I assume is not entitled to ordinary dividend payouts)
The replacement cost method you presented above is sound, my only reservation is that we may need to apply some discount as MCement has not been using up all its production capacity, not even 70% after incorporating capacity of YTL Cement and Lafarge.
I do not have the latest research report of HLB on MCement. Based on your note above, HLB is giving a TP based on 0.87x of fully diluted P/B. If the fully diluted book value is RM3.30 as per what you calculated above, then the TP given by HLB is RM2.87?
Again, I am not a fan of the P/B valuation method, unless you think that MCement may be sold to another party at such a valuation method. Another reason why I do not like the P/B valuation is that MCement has a large asset value after incorporating assets of YTL Cement and Lafarge, which has quite some spare capacity in current cement market here.
Also I am puzzled on HLB suggestion to apply a 50% discount to the 10 year mean P/B of MCement, based on the 2 reasons above: 1) lower infra spending now, 2) heavy carbon emitting
Cement business is always heavy carbon emitting, and has been like that in past decades, why apply 50% discount now on such an environmental concern?
Lower infra spending now compared to the past? Lower by how much? compared to which year in the past?
HLIB's TP is RM2.78 based on 0.87x P/B multiple. Working backward, the book value per share = RM3.2, which is slightly lower than my calculated BVPS at RM3.3 10 year average PB should therefore = 2 * 0.87 = 1.74x. P/B multiple should correlate with ROE. The highest ROE achieved was about 11% in 2012-13.
However I notice the share price peaked in 2013 to 15, close to RM10 per share, even though profits were less impressive. I suspect the share price then was driven by speculative fever as it was the period where the Najib's government tied to push multiple mega projects like LRT3, MRT3, HSR, ECRL ...
Yes, HLIB's position of 50% discount to 10-year PB average is arbitrary. However, they have a point that future infra spending is unlikely to match Najib's time, which sent Lafarge Malaysia share price to almost RM10 on future expectation that never came true. Hence a lower valuation now as compared to the past standard.
Their second justification on "heavy carbon emitting business" probably refers to fund managers today shunning perceived polluting companies. Either these managers' mandate prohibit them from investing, or they're concerned about how to exit in the future if many other fund managers are prohibited from investing. Such reduced interest from money managers due to ESG factor is a recent development. So it could also drive valuation lower as compared to the past.
I agree that P/B approach is not satisfactory due to the arbitrary nature of book value. But valuation based on multiple allow easy comparison with the past. The other multiple appoaches like P/E, P/S, P/CF are equally challenging due to business volatility as discussed earlier.
You have a good point on current low utilization. Yes, valuation cannot reach replacement cost if the industry is still awash with idle capacity in the forseeable future. Replacement cost, at best, represents the ceiling of valuation at this moment.
Yeah, the ICPS is entitled for dividend, at 1:1 to each ordinary share.
[Good to see dragon328 and observatory in this forum]
Getting some share pricing into perspective and what we may hope to expect in future
In 2013 and 2014, MCement (Lafarge)’s revenue was around RM700m per quarter and pre-tax RM120m per quarter and MCement (Lafarge) share price was around RM10 compared to present RM2.70
MCement Q3 results reported recently, Revenue was RM990m, pre-tax was RM63m For HumeInd’s revenue was RM288m Profit was RM27m
(As some may know and what I am hoping) if HSR is launched, things are going to look a lot different for MCement.
@cktay, as what you pointed out, Lafarge cement used to make RM120m pretax profit a quarter, now MCement is larger than the then Lafarge, hence higher revenue. If Mcement gets its cost hedging right, it is not surprising for it to make RM120m pretax every quarter.
CIMB maintained its “add” call on Malayan Cement Bhd (MCement) with a higher target price (TP) of RM5.08, from RM3.97, amid stronger recovery in volumes. https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/670352 https://assets.theedgemarkets.com/pics/2023/20230608cement1.png Quite a big jump for analyst Chong to make, from RM3.97 to RM5.08 (Still figuring out what my own TP should be) Today’s Price : RM3.22 PE : 37.1 (PE will come down, Q1 EPS was 0.07s, Q2 1.16s, and Q3 4.83s if the quarterly profit trend continues) NTA : RM4.48
To understand better … In 2019, YTL bought a 51% stake in Lafarge Malaysia for RM1.63 billion cash, or RM3.75 per share, from AICL (Associated International Cement Ltd) which was on a divestment spree in the region. Subsequently, a mandatory general offer (MGO) to buyout the remaining shares at RM3.75 per share. The transaction price of RM3.75 per share was 19% above Lafarge Malaysia’s five-day volume weighted average share price of RM3.15 https://theedgemalaysia.com/article/ytl-cement-completes-acquisition-51-stake-lafarge-malaysia? Subsequently in 2021, Malayan Cement took over YTL Cement's cement and ready-mixed concrete biz in RM5.16b deal (RM2b cash, shares plus preference shares at RM3.75) https://www.edgeprop.my/content/1845373/malayan-cement-take-over-ytl-cements-cement-and-ready-mixed-concrete-biz-rm516b-deal The aim was to consolidate the cement business under a singular umbrella, improving operational efficiencies, leveraging shared expertise, experience and resources.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Good123
26,432 posts
Posted by Good123 > 2023-03-06 08:42 | Report Abuse
Ytl paid rm3.75 per share to lafarge previously,now rm2.25, time for privatisation too, a good proposition Indeed