You name which counters that you ever mentioned closed at the right mentioned time and price All the counters you had mentioned all failed to performed Ready bull shits everywhere
This QR loss because low realized revenue, perhaps delay in closing account. But Qtr3 should be profitable because if you refer to QR2 report, trade +other receivable more than RM280M if you deduct trade + other payable, which means more revenues will be realized in Qtr3. Collect more.
VIZIONE HOLDINGS BERHAD ("VIZIONE" OR THE "COMPANY") THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR IN WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR
COMPANIES ("WINDING UP") PETITION WITH NO: WA-28NCC-774-09/2022 FILED BY CEDY THIRD CONTRACTING AND TRADING (M) SDN. BHD. ("PETITIONER") AGAINST VIZIONE CONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD. ("RESPONDENT") The Board of Directors of Vizione wishes to announce that its wholly owned subsidiary, Vizione Construction Sdn. Bhd., had on 22 September 2022 received a Winding Up Petition dated 19 September 2022 and Affidavit Verifying Petition affirmed on 21 September 2022 from Ravindran, the Solicitors who act on behalf of Cedy Third Contracting And Trading (M) Sdn. Bhd. [Registration No. 201701029187 (1243356-K)] ("CEDY") to demand for an amount RM1,350,000.00 due owing to CEDY.
Please refer to the attachment for further details.
This announcement is dated 23 September 2022.
========= Possibly money flowing out again. When company funds run low, directors might raise more fund via shares issuance to PP, ESOS, RI
No such court case..its nvalid and wasting court time la.
Vizione takes the position that there is no default of the 11th instalment payment and no such outstanding sum of RM1,350,000.00 due and owing to CEDY as alleged. At the material times, an advanced payment of RM1,716,313.93 has been made to CEDY. Vizione has previously demanded CEDY to refund the advance payment of RM1,716,313.93. However, CEDY refused to do so. Vizione takes the position that Vizione is entitled to set-off the sum of RM1,716,313.93 with the balance sum due in the Partial Settlement Agreement including the 11th instalment sum. Further, Vizione also take the position that the letter from CEDY dated 26/7/2022 is not a valid statutory demand and the Winding Up Petition has no basis and is an abuse of the Court’s process. Vizione will seek legal advice and oppose the Winding Up Petition accordingly.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
awesome20
1,198 posts
Posted by awesome20 > 2022-06-02 22:40 | Report Abuse
Follow my tail
This one among of them
Target at least 50% roi