think about it properly. If VT doesn't believes in High-5 biz, he wont save High5 and let it delist. If VT still believes in High-5 biz, he can buy it all for himself cheaper after High5 is delisted. Either way, High5 is gone as a listed company.
My remiser called this morning and informed me about High5 going to be delisted. i finished speaking and turned around and saw High5 van sending its bread to seven-eleven! Is this a good omen? should i keep and buy more to average up?
u jz need to ask urself..do u even eat high5 bread? most chinese ppl i know buys massimo..while malays support gardenia.. sometimes we have to have reality check.. not see van and then think it's a sign from god.. hehe
My remiser called this morning and informed me about High5 going to be delisted. i finished speaking and turned around and saw High5 van sending its bread to seven-eleven! Is this a good omen? should i keep and buy more to average up?
Syed the basis is unless you have a huge amount of silverbird shares you will get back almost nothing compared to your invested amount,So you are better off keeping it and remain a shareholder.WHY 1 because the business is a very viable business (bread is a stable food)silver bird has a fully developed factory complete with logistics and has a market share second to Gardenia prior to the crisis.It wasn't the business that failed it was breach of trust.Massimo did well as soon as they launched because its a stable food business.Silverbird didn't recovered not because of the business,it is again,a failure to perform by the people entrusted to do so!!!!! 2 the major shareholders can accumulate more shares at all the minority expense and continue the business as a private entity and monitise your shares that they acquired for peanuts.Make sense? Now for morality,should the Chairman be responsible for investors losses,in an established and very viable business.???
Syed the basis is unless you have a huge amount of silverbird shares you will get back almost nothing compared to your invested amount,So you are better off keeping it and remain a shareholder.WHY 1 because the business is a very viable business (bread is a stable food)silver bird has a fully developed factory complete with logistics and has a market share second to Gardenia prior to the crisis.It wasn't the business that failed it was breach of trust.Massimo did well as soon as they launched because its a stable food business.Silverbird didn't recovered not because of the business,it is again,a failure to perform by the people entrusted to do so!!!!! 2 the major shareholders can accumulate more shares at all the minority expense and continue the business as a private entity and monitise your shares that they acquired for peanuts.Make sense? Now for morality,should the Chairman be responsible for investors losses,in an established and very viable business.???
How are they going to pay the hundred millions of debt? Profit generated may not even be able to service the interest...Besides, I think it's almost zero chance to go after the previous chairman....
I have a friend who worked in Stamford College and He also held some Stamford College shares, after delisting somewhere around 2009, he got NOTHING he told me. 1-2 years after delisting,there were still conrrespondence from the company informing about the AGM things like that, but after that everything became mute, the colleges still there recruiting students and running courses but YOU GET NOTHING.
I have a friend who worked in Stamford College and He also held some Stamford College shares, after delisting somewhere around 2009, he got NOTHING he told me. 1-2 years after delisting,there were still conrrespondence from the company informing about the AGM things like that, but after that everything became mute, the colleges still there recruiting students and running courses but YOU GET NOTHING.
Lain kali jangan pandai-pandai pergi beli syarikat berstatus PN17, duit kita susah-susah kerja cari punya kalau beli saham PN17 masa delisted semua lesap, masa itu nangis pun tak ada guna.
I feel sorry for that idiot who use vulgar word in a professinal forum.He is making a complete fool of himself.I think he will appear as a clown in his next response hahahaha Please entertain us hehehehe
Everyone is having a good laugh watching you being manipulated to behave like a frustrated LOSER ! You started by poking fun and making silly remarks at others and now everyone is having fun waiting for your every response.hahahahahahahahahahahaha
If one has spare change, can-lah buy this counter, and then see what happens. FYI, from Aug 14, this counter will be suspended. If the co fails to re-submit regularization plan by 5 Sep, 10 Sep it will be delisted. Miracle does happen ;) LOL
wahwahwah... all really really High High risk player's ... either learn a lesson or make a big fortune in future ... respect respect ... best of luck ......
Buy 22,200 shares (~rm1k)...if hangus, hangus lah. Consider it sunk cost. If the white knight really can do miracle, then yes lah, a big fortune in the future. Sometimes it is like MLM or Ponzi scheme or gambling in Genting. Afterall, KLSE sometimes can be considered "Genting" bcoz of so many goreng counters. LOL
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
datasonic
921 posts
Posted by datasonic > 2014-08-07 11:32 | Report Abuse
can buy or can not buy?