Hi OTB, thanks for the clarification. Let the KESM management have a thought about it. I also think increasing the liquidity of the stock will unlocked the value of this stock to a certain extent. Surely the management also benefits from this exercise should they decided to do just that.
Ya lo!you claimed yourself are fund manager that control 1billion fund money. What a huge amount!!!! ONE BILLION!!!!!!!! Straight push up to RM16 by yourself lo,still need OTB help you?
Posted by paperplane2 > Oct 15, 2015 01:52 AM | Report Abuse Not just me notify this kcchongnz. OTB, rosmah, etc all identify this stock also. I just want your view on cash flows. I saw high depreciation, but also high staff benefit. Pro can con here.
High depreciation is because of its high capital requirement in its business. More important, over a period of few years, is there positive FCF? Is its recent high capex justifiable?
The answer seems to tilt towards the affirmative. But still the future is uncertain and unknowable.
The difference between KESM and V.S are:
1) KESM is a net cash company whereas VS is net debt. A safer company to invest in. In investing, and as a "small investor", I care more of downside than the upside. 2) VS appears to earn higher return on capital now. But its cash flow is not pretty. Anybody just brushing off the peril of persistent poor cash flow, in my opinion, doesn't understand it. 3) KESM was cheap when it was selling at RM2.83 a few months ago when it was first written by a course participant of mine. It has gone up by a lot since then. Notice nobody peddles this stock then and now and tell you buy buy buy except some noises? You have to judge by yourself and make your own decision if the price is still cheap.
Always remember, even a good company is not necessary a good investment. It depends on the price. If you have bought Microsoft, one of the greatest companies in the world in early 2000, you may still be losing a substantial amount of money.
Posted by paperplane2 > Oct 13, 2015 11:23 AM | Report Abuse kcchong, can help do study on KESM? I SAID RM16 much achievable they don't trust. High depreciation is depreciation..........strong cashflow is main thing
One of the course participants of one of my online courses has made a detail fundamental analysis of KESM just a few months ago when it was RM2.83. He knows much more than me about KESM. See if he can help you.
KESM is cash rich which makes it appealing, besides a plausible growth story. But RM16 when it is trading at RM4.27 now?
"When you locate a bargain, you must ask, 'Why me, God? Why am I the only one who could find this bargain?'" - Charlie Munger
Even as the macro-economics is challenging, the Group will continue its efforts to further improve its core competencies in technical, operational and production efficiencies in order to service existing and new customers for our burn-in and testing services.
Cash rich. Despite low net profit levels, KESM has been generating healthy operating cash flow, as its net profit is partly discounted by high depreciation costs. With the exception of FY03 and FY04, the group has been in a net cash position since 1997. As at end-April, KESM has a total net cash of MYR46.5m, or net cash per share of MYR1.08.
I do not care it is white cat or black cat, can catch a rat is a good cat. Please note that the trading volume for KESM is very thin, it is very difficult to move up fast. It is a fact. Unlike VS, there is a Price and Volume breakout. Growth of VS is higher than KESM, hence the price of VS moved up faster than Kesm. I have more Kesm than VS, I want to give a fair statement. However, I made more money in VS than Kesm.
This is personally attack! I am writing views on risk only! What wrong I have? Compared to others only know keep shouting buy, sapu, at least I contributed more construct ively loh!
Rosmah, dun talk like u own the forum lah! I giving my view only also can't? What u so damn afraid of? Be cool like OTB loh! If you so damn confident, you should keep buying and ignore me mah. Please be fair to me!
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
jester
852 posts
Posted by jester > 2015-10-13 14:34 | Report Abuse
Hi OTB, thanks for the clarification. Let the KESM management have a thought about it. I also think increasing the liquidity of the stock will unlocked the value of this stock to a certain extent. Surely the management also benefits from this exercise should they decided to do just that.