Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-10-17 18:02 | Report Abuse

Fakeducation:

1. Educators fail to help children to see the essence beyond words

2. Children fail to be made to understand the act of worshipping the creator of the universe beyond physical and ritualistic aspects

3.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-10-26 22:18 | Report Abuse

In a school where young minds bloom and grow,
Fundamentalism's shadow, an unsettling blow.
It divides the children into groups so stark,
Believers and nonbelievers, a division in the park.

In the core of their faith, they firmly stand,
An ingroup formed by beliefs so grand.
But in this division, the outgroup takes its place,
Isolation and ostracism, a sad and bitter taste.

Polarization brews, prejudice takes hold,
Innocent hearts, once warm, now turning cold.
In the classroom, intolerance rears its head,
Cooperation and understanding, too often left for dead.

Let's strive for unity, in diversity we'll find,
A world where all beliefs peacefully bind.
For in the hearts of children, there's hope to be seen,
A future where acceptance reigns, in every shade and sheen.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-10-28 05:47 | Report Abuse

It's about time for school children to be nurtured to embrace the universal values of humanity and equality, shedding the cloak of hypocrisy and dismantling discriminatory apartheid systems. Let's unite in the pursuit of a more just and inclusive world.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-10-29 11:03 | Report Abuse

A deep understanding of fundamentalism can potentially divide people eternally for several reasons:

1. **Rigid Belief Systems:** Fundamentalist ideologies often promote strict, unyielding belief systems. When individuals deeply understand and adhere to these ideologies, it becomes difficult for them to accept alternative viewpoints or engage in constructive dialogue with those who hold different beliefs.

2. **Ingroup-Outgroup Dynamics:** Fundamentalist groups tend to create strong ingroup-outgroup dynamics, where members feel a deep sense of identity and belonging within their group. This can lead to a perpetual "us vs. them" mentality, making reconciliation or compromise with outsiders seem nearly impossible.

3. **Lack of Critical Thinking:** Fundamentalism often discourages critical thinking and encourages unquestioning faith in doctrine. When individuals lack the ability to critically examine their beliefs, it can be challenging to bridge gaps with those who employ reason and evidence to support their views.

4. **Cultural Isolation:** A deep understanding of fundamentalism can lead to cultural isolation. Fundamentalist communities may limit interaction with those who don't share their beliefs, leading to further division and a lack of exposure to diverse perspectives.

5. **Historical Grievances:** Many fundamentalist movements are rooted in historical grievances or perceived injustices. Deep understanding of these grievances can fuel long-standing conflicts and resistance to reconciliation efforts.

6. **Fear of Change:** Fundamentalism often resists change and modernization. Deeply understanding the fear of change can perpetuate divisions as fundamentalists resist evolving societal norms and values.

7. **Echo Chambers:** Fundamentalist communities can serve as echo chambers, reinforcing their beliefs and shielding members from alternative viewpoints. This reinforces division and hinders open dialogue.

8. **Religious or Ideological Superiority:** Fundamentalism can breed a sense of religious or ideological superiority, making it difficult to engage in respectful discussions with those perceived as inferior or misled.

While deep understanding can be valuable for promoting empathy and dialogue, it can also, paradoxically, solidify divisions when it leads to a more entrenched commitment to fundamentalist ideologies. Breaking down these divisions often requires patience, open-mindedness, and efforts to foster understanding and empathy across different belief systems.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-10-31 16:29 | Report Abuse

Indoctrinating children with fundamentalism is literally dividing them eternally for several reasons:

1. **Rigid Belief Systems:** Fundamentalist ideologies often promote strict, unyielding belief systems. When individuals deeply understand and adhere to these ideologies, it becomes difficult for them to accept alternative viewpoints or engage in constructive dialogue with those who hold different beliefs.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-10-31 16:31 | Report Abuse

Indoctrinating children with fundamentalism is literally dividing them eternally for several reasons:

2. **Ingroup-Outgroup Dynamics:** Fundamentalist groups tend to create strong ingroup-outgroup dynamics, where members feel a deep sense of identity and belonging within their group. This can lead to a perpetual "us vs. them" mentality, making reconciliation or compromise with outsiders seem nearly impossible.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-10-31 16:38 | Report Abuse

Indoctrinating children with fundamentalism is a surefire way of dividing them unconcilably for several reasons:

3. **Lack of Critical Thinking:** Fundamentalism often discourages critical thinking and encourages unquestioning faith in doctrine. When individuals lack the ability to critically examine their beliefs, it can be challenging to bridge gaps with those who employ reason and evidence to support their views.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-10-31 16:46 | Report Abuse

Indoctrinating children with fundamentalism is a surefire way of dividing them unconcilably for several reasons:

4. **Cultural Isolation:** A deep understanding of fundamentalism can lead to cultural isolation. Fundamentalist communities may limit interaction with those who don't share their beliefs, leading to further division and a lack of exposure to diverse perspectives.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-10-31 16:48 | Report Abuse

Indoctrinating children with fundamentalism is a surefire way of dividing them unconcilably for several reasons:

5. **Historical Grievances:** Many fundamentalist movements are rooted in historical grievances or perceived injustices. Deep understanding of these grievances can fuel long-standing conflicts and resistance to reconciliation efforts. What a nonsensical solidarity week!????

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-11-01 13:18 | Report Abuse

DickyMe > 4 weeks ago | Report Abuse

".. religion unites,"???

It divides people into factions, it creates chaos and bloodbath.
Millions of lives have been sacrificed in the name of religion over the millenniums.
Religion has a gory history.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-05 15:53 | Report Abuse

THis halfbaked academic Teo Kok Seong has defended his charge that Chinese schools propagate racism?????

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-05 15:58 | Report Abuse

Shame on this historian who knows so little compare to Yuval Noah Harari. The paradox of fundamentalism lies in its dual capacity to foster unity among certain adherents while simultaneously fracturing broader communities. Rooted in rigid doctrines, fundamentalist beliefs often invite diverse interpretations, inadvertently creating rifts among individuals who hold contrasting views on the same faith-based principles.

This divergence culminates in profound conflicts, pitting in-groups against out-groups delineated by varying religious affiliations. These conflicts, marked by their irreconcilability, further exacerbate societal divisions, perpetuating a cycle of discord and fragmentation.

Compounding this issue is the inherent sensitivity surrounding matters of faith. Exploiting this vulnerability are external actors driven by their own agendas, capitalizing on religious divisions to further their narrow interests. These opportunistic forces manipulate religious tensions to sow chaos and advance their agendas, amplifying the rifts within communities.

Thus, while religion possesses the potential to foster cohesion and solidarity among its adherents, its exclusionary nature often breeds deeper divisions within society. Despite its unifying potential, religion's propensity for fragmentation underscores the intricate interplay between faith, interpretation, and external influences in shaping societal dynamics.

And unlike many learning institutions, vernacular schools do not condone fundamentalism.

Posted by xiaoeh > 2024-03-05 16:05 | Report Abuse

every each individual's mindset Must change from personal good/interest to country good/interest
again, some particular group will twist country good/interest to suit their own agenda
think if through experience sharing from those successful individuals that have correct world view/horizon to
periodically go back to school and society may help instill right value into young's mind

just a layman thoughts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-06 08:14 | Report Abuse

Advocating for the removal of the word and concept of "haram" in a multiracial society is essential for fostering inclusivity and reducing divisions based on religious beliefs. Instead, embracing the politically correct terminology of "legal vs. illegal" offers a more neutral and universally understandable framework, which promotes harmony and understanding among diverse communities.

1. **Promotion of Inclusivity**: Using terms like "halal vs. haram" inherently prioritizes one religious group's beliefs over others. This exclusivity can alienate members of different faiths or non-religious individuals within a multicultural society. By employing the terms "legal vs. illegal," the focus shifts from religious doctrine to universally applicable laws and regulations, fostering a sense of inclusion for all citizens regardless of their beliefs.

2. **Avoidance of Religious Bias**: The term "haram" carries strong religious connotations associated primarily with Islamic teachings. Its widespread use in public discourse may inadvertently perpetuate religious bias or favoritism, marginalizing individuals who do not adhere to Islamic beliefs. In contrast, using neutral terminology like "legal vs. illegal" ensures fairness and impartiality in addressing societal norms and regulations, free from religious bias.

3. **Clarity and Understanding**: While "halal vs. haram" may hold significance within the Islamic faith, its meaning may not be universally understood or accepted outside of Muslim communities. On the other hand, "legal vs. illegal" provides a clear and easily comprehensible framework for all members of society to understand and abide by laws and regulations governing various aspects of life, including food consumption.

4. **Facilitation of Integration**: Multiracial societies thrive on mutual respect, understanding, and integration among diverse cultural and religious groups. By adopting inclusive terminology such as "legal vs. illegal," we promote a shared sense of citizenship and belonging, facilitating greater social cohesion and harmony among all members of society.

5. **Recognition of Individual Choices**: Using terms like "food for Muslims or non-Muslims only" can inadvertently reinforce stereotypes and divisions based on religious identity. Embracing inclusive language acknowledges and respects individuals' personal choices and dietary preferences without imposing religious labels or restrictions.

In conclusion, advocating for the replacement of "haram" with "legal vs. illegal" in public discourse and embracing inclusive terminology regarding food consumption is crucial for promoting unity, inclusivity, and understanding in a multiracial society. By prioritizing neutrality, clarity, and respect for individual choices, we can build a more cohesive and harmonious community where all citizens feel valued and accepted.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-06 08:28 | Report Abuse

Teachings of Exclusivity: Certain interpretations may convey the idea that one's religion is the only true faith, potentially leading to feelings of superiority or exclusivity among children of that faith, which could hinder their ability to embrace diversity and coexist peacefully with others.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-06 08:30 | Report Abuse

Teachings of Intolerance Towards Others: Some unhealthy verses may contain language that encourages intolerance or hostility towards individuals of other faiths or beliefs, instilling divisive attitudes in children and undermining efforts to promote understanding and respect for diversity.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-06 08:30 | Report Abuse

Teachings of Discrimination: Certain teachings may imply or explicitly state that adherents of a particular religion are superior to those of other faiths, potentially fostering discriminatory attitudes among children and perpetuating social divisions based on religious identity.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-06 08:33 | Report Abuse

It's essential to approach these teachings with caution and provide children with a balanced and nuanced understanding of their religious heritage, emphasizing values of peace, tolerance, and respect for others. Encouraging critical thinking, open dialogue, and exposure to diverse perspectives can help children develop empathy, understanding, and appreciation for the richness of cultural and religious diversity in a pluralistic society. Additionally, promoting education about human rights, equality, and the importance of coexistence can empower children to become advocates for social harmony and unity.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-06 11:51 | Report Abuse

fundamentalism is detrimental to both the mental health cultivation and brain development of children and the unity, prosperity, and harmony of a country. Here's why:

Stifling Critical Thinking: Fundamentalism often promotes rigid adherence to dogma and discourages questioning or critical thinking. This stifles the intellectual curiosity and cognitive development of children, hindering their ability to analyze complex issues, form independent opinions, and engage in creative problem-solving. A healthy mental environment for children should encourage exploration, curiosity, and critical thinking skills, which are essential for their overall development.

Promoting Fear and Anxiety: Fundamentalist teachings often instill fear and anxiety in children by emphasizing punishment, judgment, and the concept of eternal damnation. This can have profound negative effects on their mental health, leading to feelings of guilt, shame, and inadequacy. Children raised in such environments may struggle with anxiety disorders, depression, and low self-esteem, hindering their overall well-being and hindering their ability to thrive.

Fostering Division and Intolerance: Fundamentalism tends to promote an "us vs. them" mentality, dividing communities along religious, ideological, or cultural lines. This fosters intolerance, bigotry, and prejudice, undermining social cohesion and unity within a country. Instead of celebrating diversity and embracing pluralism, fundamentalist ideologies promote exclusivity and hostility towards those who hold differing beliefs, exacerbating societal divisions and hindering efforts towards peace and harmony.

Undermining Social Progress: Fundamentalism often opposes progressive social values and human rights, such as gender equality, LGBTQ+ rights, and freedom of expression. By promoting regressive attitudes and discriminatory practices, fundamentalist ideologies impede the country's progress towards a more inclusive, equitable, and just society. This can lead to social unrest, political instability, and economic stagnation, hindering the country's overall prosperity and development.

Fueling Conflict and Violence: In extreme cases, fundamentalism can fuel extremism, terrorism, and violent conflict, posing a serious threat to national security and stability. Children raised in environments where violence is glorified or justified in the name of religion are at risk of being radicalized and recruited into extremist groups. This not only endangers their own lives but also undermines the safety and well-being of society as a whole.

In conclusion, fundamentalism poses significant risks to both the mental health cultivation and brain development of children and the unity, prosperity, and harmony of a country. By promoting closed-mindedness, fear, division, and intolerance, fundamentalist ideologies undermine the foundations of a healthy, inclusive society. Instead, fostering an environment that values critical thinking, tolerance, diversity, and social progress is essential for nurturing the well-being of children and building a more united, prosperous, and harmonious nation.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-07 08:28 | Report Abuse

When individuals are irremediably brainwashed and intoxicated by their indoctrination, it means that their beliefs and perspectives have been deeply ingrained in them to the point where they cannot easily be changed or altered. This indoctrination often comes from being exposed to a particular ideology, belief system, or set of doctrines over an extended period, usually in a way that discourages critical thinking or questioning.

As a result, individuals who are heavily indoctrinated tend to view the world through polarized lenses, especially when it comes to outgroups—those who do not share their beliefs or ideologies. They see members of outgroups as fundamentally different and often as adversaries or enemies. This polarization leads to an "us versus them" mentality, where individuals are more likely to demonize, stereotype, or dehumanize those who are not part of their ingroup.

Furthermore, because of their indoctrination, they may be resistant to considering alternative perspectives or engaging in open-minded dialogue with members of outgroups. Instead, they may interpret any information or evidence that contradicts their beliefs as further proof of the righteousness of their indoctrination, leading to a reinforcement of their polarized views.

In summary, individuals who are irremediably brainwashed and intoxicated by their indoctrination tend to view outgroups through polarized lenses, which can result in hostility, prejudice, and an unwillingness to engage with differing viewpoints

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-07 08:40 | Report Abuse

Solution: Replacing religiosity indoctrination with a new age ideology centered around interconnectedness and shared atoms could foster greater unity among school children. Here are the reasons why:

Scientific Foundation: The new age ideology of interconnectedness is grounded in scientific principles, particularly in the fields of biology and chemistry. By teaching children about the shared atoms that make up their bodies and how these atoms cycle through the Earth's biosphere, educators provide them with a tangible and evidence-based understanding of their connection to all living beings.

Inclusive Nature: Unlike religiosity indoctrination, which may exclude individuals who do not adhere to specific religious beliefs, the concept of interconnectedness transcends cultural and religious boundaries. It promotes inclusivity by emphasizing the commonality of all human beings and their connection to the natural world, regardless of their background or beliefs.

Promotion of Empathy and Compassion: Understanding that every person shares atoms with others, including historical figures and people from diverse backgrounds, can cultivate empathy and compassion among school children. It encourages them to recognize the inherent worth and interconnectedness of all individuals, fostering a sense of solidarity and unity.

Environmental Awareness: By highlighting the cycling of atoms through the Earth's biosphere, educators can also instill a sense of environmental stewardship in students. They can emphasize the importance of caring for the planet and its resources, as well as the interconnectedness between human actions and the health of the Earth's ecosystems.

Scientific Curiosity: Introducing children to the concept of shared atoms and interconnectedness can spark scientific curiosity and inquiry. It encourages them to ask questions about the natural world and seek a deeper understanding of their place within it, fostering critical thinking skills and a lifelong appreciation for science.

Respect for Diversity: Embracing the idea of interconnectedness encourages respect for diversity and individual differences. It teaches children that despite their unique identities and experiences, they are all part of the same interconnected web of life, promoting acceptance and celebration of diversity.

In conclusion, replacing religiosity indoctrination with a new age ideology centered around interconnectedness has the potential to foster greater unity among school children. By grounding this ideology in scientific principles, promoting inclusivity, empathy, and environmental awareness, and sparking scientific curiosity, educators can empower children to embrace their interconnectedness with all living beings and cultivate a sense of unity and compassion in their communities.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-08 18:54 | Report Abuse

Divisive factor no.1: Poor Scientific Foundation
The new age ideology of interconnectedness is grounded in scientific principles, particularly in the fields of biology and chemistry. By teaching children about the shared atoms that make up their bodies and how these atoms cycle through the Earth's biosphere, educators provide them with a tangible and evidence-based understanding of their connection to all living beings.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-08 19:57 | Report Abuse

Hell believer Vs nonhellbeliever

Hell is arguably a harmful concept that has been used throughout history to control, manipulate, and intimidate individuals. Its perpetuation serves to hinder personal growth, foster divisiveness, and undermine moral and ethical principles. As such, it should be critically examined and challenged in the interest of promoting human well-being and fostering a more compassionate and inclusive society.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-09 15:14 | Report Abuse

Teo Cock seong is wrong.

https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/698772

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-09 16:15 | Report Abuse

THis halfbaked academic Teo Kok Seong has defended his charge that Chinese schools propagate racism?????


EngineeringProfit

16,446 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 4 days ago | Report Abuse

Shame on this historian who knows so little compare to Yuval Noah Harari. The paradox of fundamentalism lies in its dual capacity to foster unity among certain adherents while simultaneously fracturing broader communities. Rooted in rigid doctrines, fundamentalist beliefs often invite diverse interpretations, inadvertently creating rifts among individuals who hold contrasting views on the same faith-based principles.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-09 19:12 | Report Abuse

Divisive factor no.1: Poor Scientific Foundation
The new age ideology of interconnectedness is grounded in scientific principles, particularly in the fields of biology and chemistry. By teaching children about the shared atoms that make up their bodies and how these atoms cycle through the Earth's biosphere, educators provide them with a tangible and evidence-based understanding of their connection to all living beings.


Divisive factor no.2: Failure of educators to tap into inclusive nature of humanity
Unlike religiosity indoctrination, which may exclude individuals who do not adhere to specific religious beliefs, the concept of interconnectedness transcends cultural and religious boundaries. It promotes inclusivity by emphasizing the commonality of all human beings and their connection to the natural world, regardless of their background or beliefs.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-10 07:54 | Report Abuse

Vernacular school educators possess a unique advantage in breaking down divisive factors due to their inherent connection to local communities and cultures. These educators are deeply rooted in the fabric of their society, allowing them to understand the nuances of diverse belief systems with patience and open-mindedness.

1. **Cultural Understanding**: Vernacular school educators are often from the same cultural background as their students, giving them a profound understanding of the societal norms, values, and traditions that shape their students' perspectives. This familiarity enables them to approach discussions about divisive topics with sensitivity and empathy.

2. **Community Engagement**: Educators in vernacular schools are actively involved in their communities, which fosters a strong sense of trust and rapport with students and their families. This close connection enables them to navigate discussions about sensitive topics with care, fostering understanding and empathy among students from different belief systems.

3. **Language Proficiency**: Vernacular school educators are typically proficient in the globally relevant language, which is often the relevant medium of communication for their students. This linguistic fluency allows for effective communication and ensures that discussions about divisive issues are conducted in a manner that is clear and culturally sensitive.

4. **Cultural Sensitivity**: Vernacular school educators are attuned to the cultural sensitivities of their students and are adept at creating inclusive learning environments where diverse perspectives are valued and respected. This sensitivity helps in addressing divisive factors with patience and understanding, rather than exacerbating tensions.

5. **Role Models in Diversity**: By embracing and celebrating the diversity within their own communities, vernacular school educators serve as powerful role models for their students. They demonstrate that it is possible to bridge differences and foster unity through respectful dialogue and mutual understanding.

In conclusion, vernacular school educators possess the necessary qualities of patience, open-mindedness, and cultural sensitivity to effectively break down divisive factors and foster understanding and empathy across different belief systems. Their deep connection to local communities, coupled with their linguistic proficiency and cultural awareness, uniquely positions them as superior agents of positive change in society.

Posted by DickyMe > 2024-03-10 12:19 | Report Abuse

For decades, Malay politicians survive on raising issue about vernacular schools.
They cite these school does not promote integration.
These young prick politicians were kids in early 80s when the old fox came into power.
The amount of abuse non Malay students faced during that time in sekolaah kebangsaan seems to be erased from history. In the effort of getting rid of non Malay teachers, Malay headmaster and dubiously qualified teachers were flooded to replace them. These teachers would target non Malay students and put pressure on them. They would say "Go to Chinese or Tamil schools if you don't like it!" Non Malay student's achievements are underwritten to please Malays. So many agitations hence vernacular schools boomed. Now they are putting on blame on non Malays. Simply jealous and childish.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-10 12:57 | Report Abuse

Spot on. Jealousy and childishness are in their blood.

Posted by DickyMe > 36 minutes ago | Report Abuse

For decades, Malay politicians survive on raising issue about vernacular schools.
They cite these school does not promote integration.
These young prick politicians were kids in early 80s when the old fox came into power.
The amount of abuse non Malay students faced during that time in sekolaah kebangsaan seems to be erased from history. In the effort of getting rid of non Malay teachers, Malay headmaster and dubiously qualified teachers were flooded to replace them. These teachers would target non Malay students and put pressure on them. They would say "Go to Chinese or Tamil schools if you don't like it!" Non Malay student's achievements are underwritten to please Malays. So many agitations hence vernacular schools boomed. Now they are putting on blame on non Malays. Simply jealous and childish.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-10 13:10 | Report Abuse

So true. It's a cycle of blame-shifting and selective memory. Malay politicians conveniently forget the abuses non-Malay students endured in national schools, where they were often marginalized and pressured to conform. The rise of vernacular schools was a response to this systemic discrimination, yet now these politicians use them as a scapegoat for integration issues. It's a classic case of historical amnesia and political opportunism at the expense of genuine progress and inclusivity.

Posted by DickyMe > 2024-03-10 14:24 | Report Abuse

Malay, Science and Maths was mandatory pass subjects during my time in school.
I was one of the pioneer batch when L.C.E became S.R.P

Posted by Integrity. Intelligent. Industrious. 3iii (iiinvestsmart)$€£¥ > 2024-03-10 14:31 | Report Abuse

While the debates go on and on, as parents please ensure your children's education is complete. Make sure they mastered B.M., English and Chinese. Mastering these 3 languages put them at an advantage for the future. Ensure that they study Mathematics well. Understanding mathematics allow them to think logically and in abstract terms. Also do not neglect the other subjects too.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-10 14:44 | Report Abuse

👍

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-10 16:47 | Report Abuse

Exactly, that's what Teo Cock Seong supposedly point out. The educators in these schools perpetuate stereotypes, prejudices, and inequalities among students of different religious and ethnic backgrounds. Addressing this issue requires a multi-faceted approach, including reforms in the education system to promote inclusivity, diversity, and understanding among students of various backgrounds.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-14 08:31 | Report Abuse

It is the emphasis on religious indoctrination, limited curriculum, suppression of dissent, social division, cultural isolation, missed opportunities for dialogue, and impact on academic achievement in schools that have collectively contributed to restricting intellectual growth and causing irreparable division among children categorised as believers and nonbelievers

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-23 18:41 | Report Abuse

Little does that shallow minded paper mill cock seong know that while integration has its merits, there are situations where segregation and avoidance may be seen as proactive measures for self-defense against slander and provocation in a hypersensitive community.



EngineeringProfit

17,089 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 13 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Protection of young children who tend to slip tongue when criticising beliefs (vernacular schools as sanctuary - safer place to make mistakes)

**Protection of Safety and Security:** In highly sensitive environments where tensions run high, segregating or avoiding certain interactions can be a way to protect individuals and communities from potential harm or conflict. It can prevent volatile situations from escalating.


EngineeringProfit

17,089 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 12 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Peaceful neighbourhood

**Preservation of Peace:** Segregation and avoidance can contribute to maintaining peace and stability within a community by minimizing contentious interactions that could lead to misunderstandings or confrontations.


EngineeringProfit

17,089 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 11 minutes ago | Report Abuse

All done for a noble reason

**Respect for Boundaries:** Respecting the boundaries and preferences of individuals and communities is crucial for fostering trust and avoiding unnecessary friction. Segregation and avoidance can be seen as a form of respecting these boundaries.


EngineeringProfit

17,089 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 8 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Suntze's art of war: To retreat by segregation is to advance harmonious agenda

**Focus on Positive Interactions:** Segregation and avoidance can redirect focus towards positive interactions and collaborations within the community, fostering a more harmonious environment where mutual respect and understanding can flourish.


EngineeringProfit

17,089 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 6 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Minimize unintentional friction and unnecessary confrontation: one man's medicine can be another man's poison

**Minimization of Provocation:** By avoiding situations that are known to provoke negative reactions or slander, individuals can protect themselves and others from unwarranted attacks or misunderstandings.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-23 18:45 | Report Abuse

Half-baked cock seong fails to understand and point out that labeling children based on their parents' religion can lead to division and exclusion within a diverse classroom. When a child is categorized solely based on their parents' religious beliefs, it can create barriers to understanding and acceptance among classmates from different backgrounds. This labeling can perpetuate stereotypes, hinder genuine interactions, and promote a sense of "us versus them" mentality.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-23 18:47 | Report Abuse

Such labeling reinforces social divisions and hierarchies within the classroom. It can lead to cliques based on religious identities, where children may feel pressure to conform to certain norms or beliefs associated with their labeled group. This not only limits their freedom of expression but also inhibits the exchange of diverse perspectives and ideas among students.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-23 18:48 | Report Abuse

Vernacular schools as sanctuary for the minority

labeling based on parents' religion can contribute to discrimination and prejudice. Children may face unfair treatment or exclusion based on stereotypes associated with their labeled group, leading to feelings of alienation and isolation. This can negatively impact their social and emotional well-being, impeding their overall development and integration within the classroom community.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-23 18:49 | Report Abuse

Vernacular schools as sanctuary for the minority

Fostering unity in a diverse classroom requires embracing and celebrating differences rather than categorizing and dividing based on parental backgrounds. By promoting inclusivity, empathy, and open-mindedness, educators can create a more harmonious and supportive learning environment where all children feel valued and accepted regardless of their parents' religious beliefs. This approach not only promotes unity but also cultivates a culture of respect, understanding, and cooperation among students from diverse backgrounds.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-28 08:52 | Report Abuse

Proto-terror, Proterror Vs Peace Within cultivation

When teaching school children about the root of terrorism, it's important to approach the topic with sensitivity and accuracy. Here are some key points they could learn and understand:

1. **Definition of Terrorism:** Start with a clear definition of terrorism as the use of violence, intimidation, or coercion for political or ideological purposes.

2. **Historical Context:** Provide historical context about various terrorist groups and movements, highlighting their origins, motivations, and actions.

3. **Factors Contributing to Terrorism:**
- Ideological Factors: Teach about extremist ideologies that promote violence, such as religious extremism or political radicalism.
- Socioeconomic Factors: Discuss how poverty, marginalization, and lack of opportunities can contribute to feelings of resentment and alienation, which may be exploited by terrorist groups.
- Political Factors: Explain how political grievances, including issues like oppression, injustice, or perceived foreign interference, can fuel terrorist activities.

4. **Impact of Terrorism:** Help students understand the devastating impact of terrorism on individuals, communities, and societies, including loss of life, fear, economic disruption, and social division.

5. **Counterterrorism Measures:** Educate students about efforts to combat terrorism, including law enforcement, intelligence gathering, international cooperation, and community resilience programs.

6. **Promote Critical Thinking:** Encourage critical thinking skills by discussing propaganda techniques used by terrorist groups to recruit and radicalize individuals, and how to critically evaluate information from various sources.

7. **Empathy and Understanding:** Emphasize the importance of empathy and understanding towards different cultures and beliefs, while also promoting tolerance, respect for human rights, and peaceful conflict resolution.

By providing a comprehensive and balanced education on terrorism, school children can develop a nuanced understanding of this complex issue and contribute to building a more peaceful and resilient society.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-03-31 08:49 | Report Abuse

Mentality of educators: noble verna Vs ignoble natio

Educators' mentality can either embrace universalism, promoting a multiracial, diverse society, or fall into the trap of "katak di bawah tempurung," fostering narrow-mindedness leading to antisemitism, and a monoethnic exclusivity that divides rather than unites.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-05-22 14:24 | Report Abuse

What children fail to learn in pseudo education: The differences between science and protopseudoscience classes; and the expected learning outcomes from each side.

Most importantly, science unites, protopseudoscience permanently divides the people among themselves and the other living things irremediably

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-05-22 14:54 | Report Abuse

Many things science methodology not able to explain why.


EngineeringProfit

17,919 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 29 seconds ago | Report Abuse

Yes, children got option to get the "why" answers if they attend the protopseudoscience classes. But there must be an honest disclaimer made clear to them that the answers are just empirical- far from absolute or evidence-based. Else how they are going to learn the basics of moral value called honesty.

And disclaimer no.2: They must be made to understand the risk - while science unites, protopseudoscience can permanently divide the people among themselves and the other living things irremediably.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-05-25 09:21 | Report Abuse

Apartheidism, defined as a system of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination, is one of the worst forms of moral and humanism violation.

1. **Denial of Basic Human Rights**: Apartheid denies individuals their basic human rights solely based on race or ethnicity. This includes the right to access to certain universities and employment/promotion opportunity. Such systemic exclusion violate the sense of moral, nobility and humanism.

2. **Perpetuation of Inequality**: By design, apartheid enforces and perpetuates inequality. It creates and maintains an unjust hierarchy where one group is considered superior and the other inferior, leading to widespread social and economic disparities that causes disunity.

3. **Psychological Harm**: Apartheid inflicts deep psychological wounds issues in the society, compromising harmony.

4. **Social Division and Conflict**: Apartheid fosters division and animosity between different racial groups. By institutionalizing segregation, it creates a society rife with mistrust, resentment, and often violence, leading to long-term social instability and conflict.

5. **Violation of Ethical Principles**: Apartheid stands in stark opposition to fundamental ethical principles such as justice, equality, and respect for human dignity. It represents an extreme form of moral failure by institutionalizing the belief that some human beings are inherently worth less than others.

6. **Global Condemnation**: The global community widely recognizes apartheid as a grave moral wrong. Historical examples, particularly in South Africa, have led to international sanctions, widespread condemnation, and efforts to dismantle such systems, underscoring its universal recognition as a profound injustice.

7. **Long-term Damage**: The effects of apartheid extend far beyond the period of its enforcement. The societal scars, economic damage, and entrenched prejudices it leaves behind can take decades, if not centuries, to heal, impacting multiple generations.

In essence, apartheidism's systematic denial of fundamental human rights, perpetuation of deep social and economic inequalities, and long-lasting harmful effects on individuals and society make it one of the worst forms of moral violation. Its comprehensive assault on human dignity and justice places it among the most reprehensible practices in human history.

Posted by chinaman > 2024-05-25 15:04 | Report Abuse

sound like our bumi affirmative action. ketuanan melayu wakaka

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-06-01 19:09 | Report Abuse

Jepun Boleh!

Japan is indeed working on an ambitious project related to space transportation, but it's not exactly a bullet train to the moon in the traditional sense. The project, spearheaded by Kyoto University and Kajima Construction, involves the creation of an interplanetary transportation system known as the Hexatrack. This system aims to facilitate travel between Earth, the Moon, and Mars by using capsules with a hexagonal shape that maintain Earth-like gravity (1G) to mitigate the effects of prolonged exposure to low gravity during space travel.

Additionally, the project includes developing a habitat called "The Glass," a rotating conical structure designed to create artificial gravity and replicate Earth's environment with amenities such as green areas and water bodies. These habitats, dubbed "Lunaglass" on the Moon and "Marsglass" on Mars, are envisioned to support long-term human habitation..

While the complete implementation of these projects is expected to take several decades, with prototypes anticipated by 2050, the ultimate goal is to enable space migration and interplanetary tourism by the latter half of the 21st century.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-06-02 15:12 | Report Abuse

Academic apartheidism in Bolehland refers to the systemic segregation and preferential treatment in the education system based on ethnicity. This practice has contributed significantly to brain drain, where highly skilled and educated individuals leave the country for better opportunities abroad. Here’s how academic apartheidism has fueled this exodus:

### 1. **Quota Systems in Higher Education**
The implements of quota systems that favor certain ethnic groups, particularly in university admissions. This policy often limits access to higher education for qualified students from non-preferred ethnic groups. As a result, many talented students seek education opportunities abroad where admission is based solely on merit.

### 2. **Limited Scholarships and Funding Opportunities**
Government scholarships and funding are often distributed unevenly, with a preference for students from specific ethnic backgrounds. This disparity discourages talented students from non-preferred groups, pushing them to pursue education in countries where financial aid and scholarships are more equitably available.

### 3. **Job Market Discrimination**
Even after obtaining higher education, graduates from non-preferred ethnic groups may face discrimination in the job market. Preferential hiring practices and limited career advancement opportunities can drive these individuals to seek employment in countries with more equitable job markets, leading to brain drain.

### 4. **Stifling of Academic Freedom**
Academic apartheidism can create an environment where academic freedom is stifled. Researchers and academics may find their work undervalued or underfunded based on their ethnicity, leading them to move to institutions abroad where their research and contributions are more appreciated and supported.

### 5. **Lack of Inclusivity in Policy Making**
Policies shaped by academic apartheidism often exclude voices from diverse ethnic backgrounds. This lack of inclusivity can result in educational and research policies that do not cater to the needs of all groups, prompting those who feel marginalized to seek opportunities in more inclusive environments abroad.

### 6. **Impact on Social Cohesion**
The systemic segregation and discrimination foster a sense of alienation among affected groups. This erodes social cohesion and creates a less conducive environment for collaboration and innovation, pushing talented individuals to leave in search of more supportive communities.

### 7. **Global Opportunities and Competitiveness**
In an increasingly globalized world, many Malaysians are attracted to the idea of studying and working in countries that offer better infrastructure, research facilities, and career opportunities. Academic apartheidism amplifies this by making the local academic and professional environment less appealing in comparison.

### Consequences of Brain Drain:
1. **Loss of Talent**: The departure of highly skilled professionals leads to a shortage of expertise in critical sectors.
2. **Economic Impact**: The loss of potential innovators and entrepreneurs can stifle economic growth and innovation.
3. **Reduced Competitiveness**: A country’s global competitiveness is hampered when its brightest minds contribute to advancements elsewhere.
4. **Social Fragmentation**: Brain drain can exacerbate existing social divides, as those who feel marginalized leave, leading to less diverse and inclusive communities.

Addressing academic apartheidism and its resultant brain drain requires a comprehensive approach to creating a more inclusive and merit-based education and employment system, promoting policies that value diversity and equal opportunity for all citizens.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

The siths and palpatine are wrong. It's the exclusionary nature of fundamentalism that is simultaneously uniting some people while dividing others. Since such dogmatic teachings are open to interpretation, it undeniably divides those who have differing opinions on the same belief. Serious unconcilable conflict occurs between the in- and out-groups formed through different religions........

Posted by Income > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

The planet of the apes? Must be shown and maker exampaper subject.