For Malsia, the lessons are clear: without decisive reforms to remove parasitic middlemen, inefficient agencies, and entrenched interests, the nation risks economic stagnation, social discontent, and a loss of competitiveness in the global economy. Ancient civilizations serve as a stark reminder that ignoring these issues can lead to unsalvageable decline.

Mesopotamia’s failure to reform its parasitic bureaucracy weakened its economic base, leaving it vulnerable to external conquests by the Assyrians and Persians. The parallel lesson for Malsia is that unchecked bureaucratic inefficiency and corruption can undermine economic productivity and lead to societal collapse if reforms are not enacted.

Like "Little Napoleons" in modern systems, local officials in Mesopotamia used their positions for personal enrichment, rather than facilitating trade or providing public services. The wealth of the state was drained by this parasitic class of officials, leading to food shortages, reduced productivity, and social unrest.

In ancient Mesopotamia, particularly under the Babylonian Empire, the complexity of the bureaucracy grew as the empire expanded. The state relied heavily on a bloated and inefficient system of officials who controlled trade, taxation, and land distribution (including rompak tanah musang king rakyat). As bureaucratic inefficiencies mounted, the agricultural sector, which was the backbone of the economy, became strained.

Ancient Egypt is another example where bureaucratic inefficiency and excessive centralization led to its downfall. As Egypt’s rulers became more focused on white elephant projects to glorify their own reigns, they overtaxed the population to finance these projects. This created a massive drain on resources that weakened the economy and led to public discontent.

The bureaucratic elite, especially the priesthood, wielded enormous power and controlled vast amounts of wealth. Over time, these elites became more self-serving, prioritizing their own wealth and status over the welfare of the population. This led to social division, famine, and unrest.

While some Pharaohs attempted reforms, they were largely cosmetic. The core problems of wealth concentration, corruption, and inefficient governance persisted, which weakened Egypt’s ability to respond to external threats like the invasions of the Hyksos and later the Persians.

The failure to address bureaucratic excess and corruption, combined with a lack of meaningful reform, led to Egypt’s decline as a dominant power. Modern parallels can be drawn to Malsia’s challenges, where entrenched interests and inefficient governance can weaken the country’s economy and social fabric.

Throughout history, the accumulation of power by bureaucrats, inefficiencies in governance, and the neglect of economic, social, and technological needs led to the collapse of once-thriving societies.

The failure to reform inefficient and parasitic bureaucratic structures has repeatedly led to the downfall of powerful civilizations. Ancient Egypt, Ancient Mesopotamian, Rome, The Ottoman Empire, , The Mughal Empire, the Han Dynasty, and others serve as cautionary tales for modern societies, showing that without reforms aimed at curbing corruption, inefficiency, and the undue influence of bureaucrats, the foundation of the state itself can crumble

A fast sinking and irremediable spiraling down debt-laden cum poverty-stricken country like malsia could only make a u-turn by removing all the middle & meddling agencies like the hundred billion parasitic jkim & its gang

The removal or reform of inefficient and parasitic agencies such as JKIM & gang could be a timely move for Malsia. It would address public concerns about the cost of governance, enhance the country's economic competitiveness, and ensure a more efficient use of resources to support long-term growth and stability.

With regional neighbors like Indonesia and Vietnam becoming more attractive to foreign investors, Malsia must act to ensure it remains competitive by creating a more business-friendly environment. Removing unnecessary middlemen is a crucial step toward that goal.

Government of the people, by the people, for the people- Public Sentiment: There is growing dissatisfaction with the government's performance in managing the economy, corruption, and inefficiency. The public may view the removal of parasitic agencies as a sign of the government’s commitment to reform and accountability.

Fiscal Crisis: Malsia is facing increasing fiscal pressures and unbearble foreign debt, and the government is searching for ways to reduce the deficit without imposing excessive taxes on citizens. Cutting out wasteful spending and inefficiencies in the public sector is a logical step.

Religious Bureaucracy as an Economic Drain: While the religious bodies play a significant role in cultural and spiritual matters, the allocation of public funds to these agencies is often questioned, especially in times of economic stress. Some argue that focusing on providing basic needs like education, healthcare, housing, and infrastructure would have a more direct and measurable impact on national prosperity than maintaining extensive religious bureaucracies.

In an increasingly globalized world, Malsia must compete with other nations that are reducing bureaucratic red tape and streamlining their administrative systems. Countries like Singapore, which emphasize a lean, efficient government structure, serve as examples of how cutting down on unnecessary agencies can improve competitiveness, attract foreign investment, and spur economic growth.

Only by removing these agencies, the government can curb inefficiencies, reduce corruption, and eliminate "power trips" that hinder economic progress.

Eliminating unnecessary layers of bureaucracy could reduce the cost of doing business and lower consumer prices, ultimately easing the financial burden on the rakyat.

Malsia's current socio-economic landscape, marked by rising costs, stagnating wages, and a fast-declining economy, necessitates a focus on efficiency, transparency, and accountability in governance and administration.

The bureaucratic layers JKIM adds is perceived as inefficiencies or additional costs passed on to businesses and consumers. For example, the halal certification process involves stringent rules and fees that businesses must adhere to, making JKIM's role akin to a gatekeeper of commerce, rather than a direct service provider to the public or cost-saving facilitator to business people.

Malsia should streamline its regulatory functions, allowing for more direct business operations without the need for religious bodies like JKIM to have such a prominent role in commercial and certification processes. This could lead to a less politicized, more economically progressive environment that favors transparency and direct governance.

A sinking and spiraling down country like malsia could only make a u-turn by removing all the middle & meddling agencies like the hundred billion parasitic jkim & its gang

With the commoners in her heart, Nyonya Teresa can be a better pm than AI

Nothing nore unislamic than this kind of dishonesty

Sudah salah pilih geng - total disrespectful of the lost msian lives in 9/11 attacks

That means, today, there are advanced scientific methods available to detect even trace amounts of alcohol in foods.

And yes, because these are man-made and arbitary - should change with time and technology

Yes, democracy (government by the ppl, of the ppl for the ppl) means every single rakyat must stand up against injustice, cruelty and kezaliman. Let the business ppl decide for themselves.

Posted by cemertugus > 7 hours ago | Report Abuse

i agreed with @EngineeringProfit, "Those that see value in obtaining halal certification—due to consumer preferences or market positioning" maybe can go for Halal Cert. they can voluntarily apply for Halal Cert. If their market for Non-Muslim, no required to have Halal Cert.

Comparing to Contemporary Halal Certification Standards: Modern halal certification bodies take a stringent approach to the inclusion of alcohol in food products. For a food to be certified halal, it must not contain any alcohol.

Stick to The Principle of Caution (Ihtiyat): In Islamic law, there is a strong principle of avoiding doubtful matters (shubuhat). If there is any uncertainty about the alcohol content in these traditional foods, Muslims are encouraged to avoid them to maintain their adherence to halal dietary laws.

Forget about human-made ruling. Islam clearly prohibits the consumption of intoxicants, particularly alcohol, regardless of the amount. Even if the alcohol content is minimal, the mere presence of alcohol in these foods contradicts halal principles. Hence, shouldn't any level of alcohol that results from fermentation, even if it doesn’t intoxicate, still invalidates the food’s halal status?

And depend on use of technology like the case of Cadbury chocolate in 2016. And soon advanced testing for presence of alcohol - abusing technology is never cheap for the general people to pay. Hard time now . Many B40. Just need food. Affordable price- not inflated one

Furthermore, if he made this accusation recklessly or with the intent to mislead the public, the defamation case strengthens. Even if he did not intend harm, negligence in verifying the facts before making public accusations would still be a valid basis for a defamation claim.

Being accused and fitnah of saying something she did not, this could constitute defamation under the law, particularly if the accusation damages her reputation, causes public outrage, or lowers her standing in the eyes of others.

In a case of defamation, the core issue revolves around making false statements that harm the reputation of another person.

In 2014, a laboratory test showed that two of a dairy milk products contained porcine DNA ........

What had he contributed to msia???? Anything positive? Got one or two? No?

Tempoyak, which is made from fermented durian, generally undergoes lactic acid fermentation, where naturally occurring lactic acid bacteria break down the sugars in durian. This process usually results in a tangy taste but can also produce small amounts of alcohol as a byproduct, similar to other fermented foods like kimchi or sauerkraut.

The alcohol content in tempoyak is formed through its fermentation process, as lactic acid bacteria tend to dominate over yeast, which is primarily responsible for alcohol production. Based on similar fermented products, the alcohol content would up to 1% alcohol by volume (ABV).

Today, there are advanced scientific methods available to detect even trace amounts of alcohol in foods. If tests confirm the presence of alcohol in these traditional foods, then declaring them haram would prevent any potential conflict with Islamic principles.

Today, there are advanced scientific methods available to detect even trace amounts of alcohol in foods. If tests confirm the presence of alcohol in these traditional foods, then declaring them haram would prevent any potential conflict with Islamic principles.

While traditional Malay foods like tapai, tempoyak, budu, and cencalok are culturally significant, their alcohol content, even in trace amounts, presents a challenge for halal compliance. Given the strict Islamic prohibition of alcohol and the modern, standardized approach to halal certification, it would be consistent to declare these foods haram if they contain any alcohol.

After all, great minds and people discuss great ideas, small minded, hearted and pen*le ppl attack the former ones

Mandatory halal certification introduces additional administrative and financial burdens, especially for small businesses. These include costs associated with compliance, auditing, and documentation, which can strain resources and reduce competitiveness, particularly for businesses that do not primarily cater to Muslim consumers. By enforcing certification, the government may inadvertently limit the flexibility and autonomy that businesses need to operate efficiently in a diverse market.

In contrast, a voluntary halal certification system would allow businesses to respond to market demand organically. Those that see value in obtaining halal certification—due to consumer preferences or market positioning—can do so without being forced. This market-driven approach encourages healthy competition and innovation, while avoiding the imposition of unnecessary costs on businesses that may not benefit from certification.

Forcing compliance could also create operational inefficiencies, leading to higher prices for consumers and reducing the overall agility of businesses in adapting to changing market conditions. Thus, voluntary certification strikes a balance, supporting both the needs of relevant consumers and the sustainability of diverse business operations.

And know why Kodak and Nokia became irrelevant - yup, dinosaur-like stagnation and morbidly unchanging. The rigid and overly cautious nature of JAKIM’s halal certification process may stifle innovation, particularly in industries that rely on fast-paced product development, such as food technology or pharmaceuticals. Entrepreneurs and investors may be deterred from developing innovative halal products or services due to fears of being bogged down in regulatory red tape. Malaysia risks missing out on becoming a leader in innovative halal markets, which are increasingly important in the global economy.

This stagnation in innovation can reduce the economy’s ability to diversify and grow, further shrinking the pie for all players. For example, Thailand’s emphasis on halal tourism, technology, and food production is becoming increasingly attractive to investors who seek lower barriers to entry.

We must strive to put a full stop to such a dark system from the very begining. The strict criteria for halal certification affect not only food preparation but also the sourcing of raw materials. Businesses are required to use ingredients from halal-certified suppliers, limiting their options and increasing procurement costs. The scarcity of halal-certified suppliers in certain areas can further drive up the price of halal meals, as suppliers may charge a premium due to limited competition.

Do proper math. Tons of hidden cost and under the table money required - from the source to product prep. Procurement from limited source, etc. Think twice

Superior leader Nyonya discuss idea, but inferior akmalkin skywalker attacks person

Extremely rude and unbecoming of him to name calling her nyonya Tua. Can she sue him for a million dollar for this?


EngineeringProfit

18,828 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 day ago | Report Abuse

In Malaysia, defamation is covered under the Defamation Act 1957. Defamation occurs when a statement made by one person causes harm to another's reputation in the eyes of a reasonable person.
To prove defamation, Teresa Kok would need to demonstrate that:
The statement was published (made public, whether verbally or in writing).
The statement referred to her.
The statement caused damage to her reputation.
The statement was not true or could not be justified as a fair comment.

Also no rotavirus, microplastic, hormone disruptors., trans-fat, saturated fats.................................................