His lack of diplomacy and balance in dealing with sensitive issues is glaring, stirring unnecessarily provocative and as pandering to extremist sentiments rather than fostering inclusiveness. This approach alienates more moderate factions of the population, which is critical for a youth leader

This time, she got same level of confidence or not?

Posted by Sslee > 2 hours ago | Report Abuse

Where are all the men in DAP?
Need a DAP lady take on UMNO again.

Jamal Yunos cedes RM300,000 to Teresa Kok after losing final appeal
Federal Court tosses Umno man’s bid to appeal ruling favouring Seputeh MP in defamation suit.

Agricultural decline: The agricultural base of the empire began to erode due to poor management of irrigation systems and the overuse of farmland. This led to food shortages, population decline, and social unrest.

Overemphasis on orthodoxy: Religious orthodoxy became a central focus, which, while unifying in some respects, also led to resistance to change and an inability to adapt to evolving social and political realities.

Cultural and Intellectual Decline:

- Shift from rationalism to conservatism: During the early centuries, its world was a hub of scientific, philosophical, and cultural advancements. However, a gradual shift toward delusion, conservatism and dogmatism, especially from the 11th century onward, led to the suppression of free inquiry and intellectual stagnation.

- Loss of innovation: The decline in scientific and technological progress weakened the empire’s ability to compete with rising European powers, contributing to its eventual downfall.

The empire’s initial strength lay in its ability to integrate diverse peoples and promote intellectual and economic flourishing, but its later period was characterized by fragmentation, stagnation, and vulnerability to external forces.

But subsequently led to their downfall too

It did serve the purpose to unite mob of ppl to serve their leaders with the promise of iut-of-misery blissful afterlife in heaven

Posted by qqq47660 > 20 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Siti Kasim to PMX: Name me one country which enjoys top-notch devt by injecting religion into their admin system


religion has never stop state empires and strong countries from expanding , example Islamic empire and christian empires.

As a Sarawakian, let me answer your question - if no BlackRock, no interracial harmony, only got palacetin, halal eateries and burning bursa , we join Singapore to form Singawakto enjoy Aussie strength currency, first word education standard and hmmm

I have pull out from stock....the last counter was Petdag....sold all last week

As a youth leader, fostering inclusiveness across ethnic and religious lines is important for building a future generation of unified citizens. However, some of his actions clearly lean towards reinforcing conservative or nationalist rhetoric, which limit his ability to connect with a broader, more diverse local youth demographic

A leader must demonstrate honesty, ethical behavior, and take responsibility for their actions to earn respect, build credibility and most importantly influence others positively and constructively.

The ability to navigate changing environments and consider diverse perspectives helps a leader address the evolving challenges facing youth - with or without delusions

Collaborative Spirit: Encouraging teamwork and valuing different contributions fosters unity and enhances collective success. Encouraging teamwork and valuing different contributions fosters unity and enhances collective success.

Creativity in addressing issues, coupled with critical thinking, helps generate practical and impactful solutions to challenges.

......that akmalkin Skywalker doesn't have

Corruptocracy - gomen of the powerful ppl, by the powerful ppl, for the powerful ppl

In messy state....yes

Thanks to impotent pm.....busy globe trotting and jaga tepi kain orang palacetin.....own country economy continues to burn

HIs action has resulted bursa to be "burnt down" by batu hitam

Defamation laws exist to protect individuals from fitnah and false statements that damage their reputation. If his accusation causes her to be viewed in a negative light—either personally or professionally—she has the right to seek redress. Such an accusation could damage her political career, trust with her constituents, and public image.

Politicians are often the subject of public debate, but this does not absolve individuals from making false claims about them. While freedom of speech is protected, it does not extend to the right to defame someone, even in the context of political discourse. Public figures, while subject to greater scrutiny, are still entitled to protection against fabricated statements.

Politicians are often the subject of public debate, but this does not absolve individuals from making false claims about them. While freedom of speech is protected, it does not extend to the right to defame someone, even in the context of political discourse. Public figures, while subject to greater scrutiny, are still entitled to protection against fabricated statements.

Wow......................ini REFORMASI ke? Or revolutionary?

Posted by JJPTR > 39 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Can PM announce those born after 1957 are Malaysians?

While the religious bodies play a significant role in cultural and spiritual matters, the allocation of public funds to these agencies is often questioned, especially in times of economic stress. Some argue that focusing on providing basic needs like education, healthcare, housing, and infrastructure would have a more direct and measurable impact on national prosperity than maintaining extensive religious bureaucracies.

Malsia must do the only one right thing i.e. streamline all eateries to be 1msian-friendly- streamline its regulatory functions, allowing for more direct business operations without the need for religious bodies like JKIM to have such a prominent role in commercial and certification processes. This could lead to a less politicized, more economically progressive environment that favors transparency and direct governance.

We got no time for that- don't u see the country debt would become unbearable soon. Still have to hold on to all the dinosaur policies, principles and practices by all the dinosaur agencies?

Yes, it is absolutely useless doing lip services only- but paradoxically contradicting when comes to action. After all, action speak louder that words

Unfortunately, 3R in the context of the 21st-century Industrial Revolution 4.0 that everyone should learn, internalise and master are:

Resilient: Emphasizes the need for systems and businesses to be adaptable and robust in the face of rapid technological changes and disruptions.

Responsive: Highlights the importance of agility and quick adaptation to emerging trends, technologies, and market demands.

Revolutionary: Reflects the transformative impact of Industry 4.0 technologies, driving innovation and significant changes in industry practices and processes.

How ill-prepared could we be?

Posted by qqq47660 > 5 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Thailand seems to have handled it better .

Thailand handles it expertly with no one winning everything

thailand is so good, the country was never colonised. and now thailand is a favorite for investors.

More pertaining question are: Who does the right thing as an MP for her people? And who just simply criticise her?

Ikan bilis saja....................................at the bottom of the sea though................................yet still continue to sink (unlike Singapore)

Foundation of Morality and Behavior

God-fearing Society: In a god-fearing society, morality is typically grounded in religious teachings, with individuals encouraged (or required) to follow divine laws and principles. The primary motivation for ethical behavior stems from the fear of divine punishment or the desire for reward in the afterlife. Religious texts, clergy, or religious institutions often play a key role in shaping the rules and expectations for how people should live.
Outcome: People may adhere to moral codes out of obligation or fear, but this often results in superficial compliance. The focus is more on avoiding sin than on cultivating independent ethical reasoning. There might be limited room for questioning, innovation, or debate if religious dogma is seen as absolute.

Mature Society: A mature society encourages people to take personal responsibility for their actions based on critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and empathy, without necessarily relying on religious edicts. Morality is often shaped by social contracts, human rights, and universal principles such as justice, fairness, and equality.
Outcome: Citizens are empowered to think for themselves, take responsibility for their actions, and contribute to societal progress. They are motivated by an intrinsic understanding of right and wrong, rather than external fear. This often leads to more openness, adaptability, and progress in fields like science, education, and human rights.

Yes, the real focus is to put a full stop to such hypocrisy - cruelty, hostility and bigotry. An push just focus on building Utopia on earth here

What!??? Utopia is here on earth?

Reformasi vs Madani: Approach to Governance and Law

God-fearing Society: Laws and policies in a god-fearing society are often derived from religious texts or are heavily influenced by religious authorities. The goal is to create a society that reflects divine will, with laws that enforce moral and religious behavior. Legal systems may include religious courts, and civil liberties might be restricted based on religious morality.
Outcome: Governance may be rigid, with limited tolerance for diversity in thought or belief. Laws may be enforced in a way that prioritizes religious conformity over personal freedom, often leading to reduced innovation, human rights, and inclusivity. Examples include countries where blasphemy, apostasy, or non-religious practices are criminalized, affecting freedom of expression and individual rights.

Mature Society: In a mature society, laws are created through a democratic or consultative process, reflecting the needs of a diverse population. Legal frameworks emphasize individual rights, fairness, and justice, with secular laws that apply equally to all citizens, regardless of religion.
Outcome: Such societies tend to be more inclusive, adaptable, and focused on social progress. Laws are shaped by public discourse, evidence-based policymaking, and respect for personal freedoms. This approach fosters innovation, equality, and a system that encourages people to take responsibility for their actions within a fair legal framework.

Freedom of Thought and Expression

God-fearing Society: In a society centered around the fear of God, freedom of thought and expression is limited, especially when it comes to questioning or challenging religious doctrines. Religious authorities hold significant influence over what is acceptable speech or thought, and dissent would met with punishment or ostracism.
Outcome: Intellectual growth may be stifled, as individuals are discouraged from critically examining religious or societal norms. Creativity, scientific inquiry, and innovation may suffer if they conflict with religious interpretations. Education systems might focus more on religious instruction than on fostering critical thinking.

Mature Society: A mature society encourages open discourse, debate, and critical thinking. Individuals are free to question authority, whether it’s religious, governmental, or cultural. Education systems are designed to foster independent thought, creativity, and problem-solving skills.
Outcome: A mature society tends to produce more innovative thinkers, entrepreneurs, and problem-solvers. This freedom of expression and thought can lead to advancements in science, technology, and the arts, as well as the development of more humane and inclusive policies.

reedom of Thought and Expression

God-fearing Society: In a society centered around the fear of God, freedom of thought and expression is limited, especially when it comes to questioning or challenging religious doctrines. Religious authorities hold significant influence over what is acceptable speech or thought, and dissent would met with punishment or ostracism.
Outcome: Intellectual growth may be stifled, as individuals are discouraged from critically examining religious or societal norms. Creativity, scientific inquiry, and innovation may suffer if they conflict with religious interpretations. Education systems might focus more on religious instruction than on fostering critical thinking.

Mature Society: A mature society encourages open discourse, debate, and critical thinking. Individuals are free to question authority, whether it’s religious, governmental, or cultural. Education systems are designed to foster independent thought, creativity, and problem-solving skills.
Outcome: A mature society tends to produce more innovative thinkers, entrepreneurs, and problem-solvers. This freedom of expression and thought can lead to advancements in science, technology, and the arts, as well as the development of more humane and inclusive policies.

Role of Fear vs. Personal Responsibility

God-fearing Society: In a god-fearing society, fear of divine retribution is a central motivator for good behavior. This fear may extend to fear of punishment from religious or legal authorities for violating religious laws. The emphasis is on avoiding wrongdoing because of external consequences, rather than an internal sense of responsibility.
Outcome: While this approach can create a compliant society, it may not cultivate genuine responsibility or ethical maturity. People might follow rules to avoid punishment, but not necessarily because they understand or agree with the moral reasoning behind them.

Mature Society: A mature society operates on the principle that individuals are capable of making their own moral decisions and are responsible for the consequences of their actions. People are encouraged to think critically about their behavior, to understand the impact of their choices on others, and to act out of empathy and reason rather than fear.
Outcome: This approach fosters a deeper sense of personal accountability. People learn to self-regulate their behavior, contribute positively to society, and take ownership of their mistakes. It encourages moral development and ethical decision-making based on understanding, not fear.

Adaptability and Progress

God-fearing Society: A society based on religious fear may be less adaptable to change, as religious laws and traditions are often seen as immutable. Resistance to modernity, social progress, or changes in cultural practices can be strong, especially if they are perceived as contradicting religious teachings.
Outcome: This can lead to stagnation in social, scientific, and technological development. The focus on maintaining traditional religious norms may hinder progress in areas like gender equality, human rights, or innovation.

Mature Society: A mature society is more adaptable and open to change, as it relies on evidence, critical thinking, and open debate to shape its policies and practices. This allows it to respond more effectively to new challenges, such as technological advancements, environmental issues, or evolving social norms.
Outcome: Mature societies tend to be more dynamic and forward-thinking. They are better equipped to handle modern challenges and are more likely to invest in innovation, equality, and sustainability.

A god-fearing society is often grounded in religious obedience, fear of divine punishment, and a rigid moral framework based on religious texts. While this may provide social cohesion and a shared moral code, it can limit personal freedom, stifle critical thinking, and hinder adaptability.

In contrast, a mature society encourages personal responsibility, ethical reasoning, and critical thinking. It promotes individual rights, social progress, and inclusivity. People in a mature society are motivated not by fear, but by an understanding of their role in contributing to the common good, leading to a more progressive, adaptable, and innovative environment.

Muslim eateries with halal cert shouldn't sell to Non-Muslims

The idea that these rules come straight from the big boss upstairs pretty much makes any opposing opinions about as useful as a chocolate teapot. In this case, it’s all about sticking to the heavenly script, no shortcuts or modern-day workarounds. If anyone tries to wiggle in some flexible interpretation, it's basically just humans looking for a divine loophole to bend the rules!

Divine law as unwavering: From this viewpoint, the presence of even the smallest trace of a forbidden substance is enough to render a product impermissible, as religious law is seen as unwavering and not subject to human rationalization. Thus, while technology can help identify these substances more accurately, the fundamental issue is not technological capability but the underlying religious mandate to avoid what is forbidden.

Divine law as unwavering: From this viewpoint, the presence of even the smallest trace of a forbidden substance is enough to render a product impermissible, as religious law is seen as unwavering and not subject to human rationalization. Thus, while technology can help identify these substances more accurately, the fundamental issue is not technological capability but the underlying religious mandate to avoid what is forbidden.

Any attempt to allow conflicting rulings or flexibility in interpretation is just an excuse by humans to circumvent or dilute divine mandates.

The idea that these rules come straight from the big boss upstairs pretty much makes any opposing opinions about as useful as a chocolate teapot. In this case, it’s all about sticking to the heavenly script, no shortcuts or modern-day workarounds. If anyone tries to wiggle in some flexible interpretation, it's basically just humans looking for a divine loophole to bend the rules!

These prohibitions are divinely ordained, with no room for human interpretation or compromise. In this view, whether it’s high-tech DNA testing to detect traces of pork in chocolate or using simple methods to check for alcohol in fermented food like tempoyak, the presence of these substances is inherently sinful or forbidden.

How?..............By playing their related issues down or up?

Whether hi-tech testing for pig dna in chocolate or simple test tube testing for alcohol in tempoyak- the presence of either one is strictly prohibited by heaven, no? Anything else- conflicting rulings are man-made human's excuse, no?

Whether hi-tech testing for pig dna in chocolate or simple test tube testing for alcohol in tempoyak- the presence of either one is strictly prohibited by heaven, no? What u say are man-made human's excuse, no?

For Malsia, the lessons are clear: without decisive reforms to remove parasitic middlemen, inefficient agencies, and entrenched interests, the nation risks economic stagnation, social discontent, and a loss of competitiveness in the global economy. Ancient civilizations serve as a stark reminder that ignoring these issues can lead to unsalvageable decline.