kahhoeng I believe base on the response that you have received there is no case. No case does not mean fairness, but that means external parties cannot exert any actions. Capital repayment, if it comes, will only act as a sweetener to enable the RPT. Complaining to SC will not make any difference.
chonghai, I was informed by SC around 3:30 pm today the investigation is still ongoing, except that they can't reveal any detail, and reassure me its been taken seriously. I have stressed my request for a capital repayment option and not intended to go against Rozali. Lets see how it goes, given the concerns have been filed already. If you are a shareholder and is concerned, do call SC. Every shareholder raising concern counts!
Even KYY a multimillionaire cannot do anything when Xinquan doesn't want to pay dividend what chance has you?
Posted by kahhoeng > May 9, 2017 08:48 PM | Report Abuse chonghai, I was informed by SC around 3:30 pm today the investigation is still ongoing, except that they can't reveal any detail, and reassure me its been taken seriously. I have stressed my request for a capital repayment option and not intended to go against Rozali. Lets see how it goes, given the concerns have been filed already. If you are a shareholder and is concerned, do call SC. Every shareholder raising concern counts!
ks55, like I said, I don't know if what I'm doing can have any effect, but I'm trying my best and approaching whom I think can have an impact. Of course, if you are a minority sharing the same concern, you are welcome to approach SC to learn what I have been trying to do in case if you thought that I'm just cakap cakap here. Posting 'I doubt' won't make a difference, trying new approaches from each lesson learnt will offer hope.
And, may I add, the more shareholders calling SC, taking active role to seek better treatment, the better the outcome it can be. So, I would appreciate active participation from all of you.
Puncak wishes to announce to the Exchange that the Company had, on the evening of 9 May 2017, received a sealed copy of the Amended Writ together with an Amended Statement of Claim both dated 28 April 2017 from the solicitors of Pengurusan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd (“PASSB”).
The Suit arose from alleged breaches on the Sale and Purchase Agreement dated 11 November 2014 (“SPA”) between Puncak and PASSB relating to the disposals by Puncak of the entire equity interest and cumulative convertible redeemable preference shares held in Puncak Niaga (M) Sdn Bhd (“PNSB”) and 70% equity interest and RM212.0 million nominal value of redeemable convertible loan stocks held in Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd (“SYABAS”) to PASSB for RM1,555.3 million in line with the consolidation/restructuring of the water industry in the State of Selangor and the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya by the State Government and the Federal Government. The disposals of PNSB and SYABAS were completed on 15 October 2015.
In the Suit, Puncak is named as the First Defendant.
The relief sought by PASSB against Puncak is as follows:-
(i) a sum of RM63,237,583.05 (“Sum”) to be paid within 14 days from the date of the Honourable Court judgment.
(ii) interests on the Sum at the rate of 5% per annum to be calculated from 22 August 2016 until full payment thereof.
(iii) a declaration that Puncak continues to indemnify PASSB for all losses which arises after the filing of this claim that PASSB may suffer as a result of the breaches in this action, including but not limited to future RPGT relation to the transfer of properties of PNSB to Puncak Group under the SPA.
(iv) general damages to be assessed (“Assessed Damages”) and interests on the Assessed Damages at the rate of 5% per annum to be calculated from the date of assessment until full payment thereof.
(v) an order that Puncak do deliver to PASSB the original or photocopies of PNSB’s documents within seven (7) days from the date of the Honourable Court order.
(vi) costs and interests at the rate of 5% and other reliefs or orders that the Honourable Court may deem fit and proper to grant.
Puncak has instructed its solicitors to contest the matter and to file an appearance at the pre-trial case management on 17 May 2017.
Pending the outcome of the Suit, there is no financial impact on the Puncak Group. There is also no operational impact on the Puncak Group.
Puncak will make the relevant announcement on further developments on this matter in due course.
In view of the latest suit, pending any impact on the original sum of sale proceed RM 1.55 B, i am wondering whether complain made to SC on the triggered issue of PN 16 would be jeopardized.
PN 16 is for cash rich company of which cash is 70% or more of company asset. Currently, Puncak is no longer under this category. Furthermore, a sue that demand money from Puncak will only drain its cash, instead of the other way. So, it won't trigger PN 16 classification. The best option for minorities, I guess, would be a collective action demanding capital repayment option.
The company still has over 1 billion cash in hand, the cost of Selangor state government's final cost is not even 10% of the cash value, yet the company share price has fallen to less than 40% cash. Worse yet, some smart guy suggesting it should trade below 20% cash in hand... What's more interesting yet disgusting, the company's board is doing nothing, as if minorities are used disposal diapers...
rzl son is very grateful to hv a good father albeit many others try to prevent his father to become a good one! father and son know their most important task is to sfeguard their wealth after knowing some ppl try to rob them!
firehawk, in my opinion, to Puncak minorities, TRIPLC share price has nothing to do with us, the minorities. TRIPLC dilemma has more to do with its board representing the shareholders. I'm tired of reading Puncak Niaga's quarter reports, annual reports, and deals trying to ascertain if any deal is trying to take advantage of us minorities. I'm only hoping to push for a capital repayment option and never look at Rozali and his related companies shares in future (unless I'm not aware of it.) I enjoy investing, not spotting potential misconduct!
Rozali really needs to look into himself to ascertain if he can really treat his minorities in this fashion...
Better get the Management to appoint auditor to conduct a special audit or forensic audit for the huge losses suffered in year 2016. It could be due to irregulari....
kennylim great plan? By buying L3 financial asset in the 2nd quarter to be sold in the 4th quarter? By buying 1.5 years "matured" palm oil plantation at premium? Or by buying a construction company with less than 120 million market cap before announcement at 210 million (while currently traded at less than 150 million, or was I wrong with the number?) while its own share is traded at less than 40% cash value?!?
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
firehawk
4,783 posts
Posted by firehawk > 2017-05-09 09:49 | Report Abuse
Undoubtedly ... rzl is a good father ....