ROI is (19312+1750)/2330*100% = 904% gain in less than 3 years.
The best performer in last 3 years.
Question to ponder ?? Can Hengyuan in 2017 like VS in 2015 ? I believe the growth of Hengyuan can match VS in 2015. Let time tells us the final result in next 3 years.
HI SIFU OTB, good morning ! Re. your comment above, do you agree that: 1. VS 2014 was in quite a different scenario: a. Industry was moving towards digitised automation b. Rising global demand for EMS catering for multiple MNCs. c. VS and many others had positioned themselves in this most beneficial environments, benefited from a more visible earnings growth.
2. HRC, no doubt had not appreciated much, but is in quite a different environment: a. O&G market growth slim and unstable b. The move towards alternative energy is gaining momentum esp China, its potential market for refinery products. c. Potential potent competitors, Petronas d. Shorter term may be good bcos of adjustment for high cash flow but where is the growth for longer term ? 14/10/2017 11:24
( ME )
I FIND ABOVE MESSAGE FROM A FORUMER NAMELY 'SALAM' DURING HIS POINTING OUT IN HENG YUANG THREAD . It's a good question that one should pay attention of to better understand the EMS-vi investment we are in now .
The Company shall have the option to redeem the RCPS in cash at 100% of the Issue Price,in whole or in part (but always in the same proportion in relation to each RCPS Holder), at any time from and including the third anniversary of the Issue Date up to the day immediately preceding the Maturity Date. So eventually is the company will buy back at 95c after maturity date ?
good morning venFx , the maturity date is third anniversary of the Issue Date. Can I said if any one buy at today price 76c, after the maturity date will get almost 30 % of profit ? because on the maturity date company would buy back 95c(original price) ?
Comcorp has disposed their EMS subsidiary (BCM Electronics). I took some time to read in detail the proposal, one of the reason is this:
(iv) Dependence on key customers
BCM Electronics is dependent on its top five (5) key customers who contributed approximately 90% of its revenue for the past five (5) FYEs. Customers are demanding their EMS partner to have total integrated services capability, including manufacturing of plastic and mechanical component parts, in order to maintain cost competitiveness. Lack of R&D capability and no economies of scale for vertical integration will pose further threats for BCM Electronics’ ability to meet its customers’ requirements and to continue receiving contracts from them.
This again prove that vertical integration is the key to survive and succeed in a highly competitive EMS sector, and what the EG management currently doing is on right track (in fact their strategy is VI +).
Agree. They won't be doing nothing. But to convince the Thailand authority really takes longer than expected time. I will ask the management in the coming AGM.
Vertical integration in EMS is no longer a new thing, in fact, it is what the big player in EMS that had done it late-90s'. Making VI or VI+ (no significant differentiation than other EMS VI) as strategy is old fashion, as VI is the integrated service, both backward & forward that all EMS must have in the era. Competing with competitors with its VI+ could not differentiate EG with competitor nor strengthening its corporate positioning. In fact, technological imperative and capability is what EG competitors are doing now, and is what customers are looking for. How could they even build SMT City with current technology they have, highly manual, warehouse record keeping using bin card etc. I agree on plastic injection moulding business they have, but with current EG sale force that is grossly incompetent to develop the business for its sustainability; who are their customer profile? Whoever it is, for sure they are not WD nor Dyson. Again, back to the question, what is significantly differentiate themselves with a + behind VI? They are putting it for the sake of putting it. They are just delusional C suite.
First of all. No one is saying vertical integration is a new thing, as it is a business strategy that dates back even to more than 50 years ago in other sectors. What EG is doing now is at least aligning well in the current EMS landscape, as there are losing parties such as Comcorp which fails to cope with this landscape in EMS.
Of course challenges will be there and will be enormous. But the facts are: EG has been able to grow their top-line and bottom line.
For sure their customer profile are not WD or Dyson? EG has been manufacturing PCBA for WD since 1994 and started manufacturing box-build for WD starting 2015. EG start to manufacture PCBA for Dyson in 2007, and from the latest development, it seems they are given the privilege to manufacture a box-build product for Dyson.
The plus in VI+ means distribution, on top of VI. For sure it is not delusional or imaginary item, though the effect of this is yet to seen fully.
For SMT City, I agree, I also laugh when I saw this. However soon I realized I might be making a mistake. Yes, they are far from achieving that and more work needs to be done, put in more automation, but they are doing works. It is just too easy for me to sit comfortably in an air-con room and become a 'keyboard warrior' criticizing and laughing at other's dream.
"For sure customer profile are not WD and Dyson" referring to the customer base they have for their plastic injection moulding business. Yes, they are doing box build for WD, but now with few WD model that use to manufacture by EG already EOL, their box build production space according to their staff, is left empty. Talking about FLIC, to be frank, it is not being mass produce as per what they brag in the news. Both EG and FLIC are over confident on the world smartest button thing, well, it's ended as a dumb button. EG business, while waiting Dyson awarded project to them to EOL, with no new model for EG in future, as well as WD high volume but thin margin, both of this customer down, means EG will fall as well. Other customers they have, are too small to sustain their business.
VI+ means distribution, while VI doesn't involve distribution? The simple theoretical concept of VI had been already putting distribution as major element, which in supply chain we are referring it as forward vertical integration. This is why their C Suite are never creative and of low knowledge. Looking at their C Suite, particularly EG Production Director,not to discriminate, but how come someone with Diploma can be director?
EG mentioned in their prospectus for the latesr RI, that they have secured new box-build contract worth RM 300 Mil. for 2 years. Can you do us a favor to answer these 2 question?
Eg has doung excellent for their capital investment need toward 2020, Thats the most important area to lay out first. It never easy for them as a penny EMs.
Now, i hope they will propel by the next 2 qtr results to attract more attention from iBs, by then their market capital would improve another 50% to a minima 400mil cap. from currently less than 200mil.
Part 2, are the fresh contracts secured after the plant & adsembly line inspection somewhere q317. Of which,I'm still waiting the update from EG .
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Cimbnet
317 posts
Posted by Cimbnet > 2017-10-13 18:38 | Report Abuse
Nice. Managed to top up at 74