The related party transaction that wistron have with fpi for supplying speaker is actually a customer of fpi. It is fpi that get the contract however as it is an ODM there is a part that fpi do not have and it will require to have a heavy CAPEX on machinery if fpi would to do it itself. In regard to this, fpi has asked wistron to provide the part of which wistron has the machinery and was producing for other customer in China. To get the contract and to minimise the working capital, fpi offer wistron to sign the contract with the customer while wistron at as a main ODM.
If you analysis the detail you will notice that the supply of wistron part to fpi is lower than the work delivery by fpi as finish product.
Hope my sharing clear the doubt of the matter since so many is interested in the fact while some are providing own self opinion to the public.
Fpi has been discussing with wistron for a vertical integration production. As wistron is an OEM, she is not interested in the manual or lower margin finishing step of the product, therefore fpi fit into this category. It is yet to see if this deal will come through and perhaps we will know in the near future once Wistron digested its expansion capability on the PJ factory. If this happen, it is a major grow catalyst for fpi on top of its own business grow now.
Deduct the 20 sen to be received soon, if you buy at 3.81 it is like buying at 3.61 post dividend. Would you pay something that gives 20 sen div per year, annual EPS close to 40 sen with aggressive growth and net cash of above 80 sen per share (minus the 20 sen div) for 3.61? Maybe it is the most value for money of EMS stock in Malaysia at the moment.
FPI is OEM / ODM for Sony, Bose (not sure about present), Kenwood etc. I'm not sure who are the top 3 customers of FPI but I believe they are Sony, Roland and Sonos (through Wistron). Is that possible for you to get some verification from other sources?
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
JKing
239 posts
Posted by JKing > 2022-01-31 17:05 | Report Abuse
The related party transaction that wistron have with fpi for supplying speaker is actually a customer of fpi. It is fpi that get the contract however as it is an ODM there is a part that fpi do not have and it will require to have a heavy CAPEX on machinery if fpi would to do it itself.
In regard to this, fpi has asked wistron to provide the part of which wistron has the machinery and was producing for other customer in China.
To get the contract and to minimise the working capital, fpi offer wistron to sign the contract with the customer while wistron at as a main ODM.
If you analysis the detail you will notice that the supply of wistron part to fpi is lower than the work delivery by fpi as finish product.
Hope my sharing clear the doubt of the matter since so many is interested in the fact while some are providing own self opinion to the public.