brian, thought you really very geng, GO rules also needs to be spoonfed. anyway, pls refer to rule 4 of the Code. pls see notes also if you need further explanation to understand.
Tom dick and Harry can simply just google and Quote Rule 4, if it’s so simple by just refer to the bold word “Part B Take Over”, I won’t be asking John…
brian, GO price must not be lower than the share sale price. must be at least equal to the price they buy from the major shareholder(s). it's in the guidelines. i don't spoonfeed my juniors in the bank. and i don't think you're a junior. you always talk like you're a senior. anyway, i rest my case here and will not divulge anything else on the matter. thank you all.
brian, didnt know have to spoonfeed you like a baby. you may see para 6.03 of the Code on the offer price. need to teach you any other thing on the take-over code?
but the good thing is you have got a pretty good entry price, congratulations in advance.
Chosen, u like to cherry pick and CHOOSE what to believe isn’t it? mandatory only happen AFTER the acquirer purchases a block of shares, which triggers take over threshold! So what happen between acquirer co and LTAT is BEFORE, take over only mandatory AFTER LTAT sold its block!
facts- LTAT now is getting bid for its block. urs? wait for ur turn... lots of corporate finance tactics can happen between these dates... good luck...
lol, you're the one who is doing the cherry pick, why are you singling out LTAT? Are they the single largest shareholder or the controlling shareholder of BPlant? Unless you are talking about it and its PACs, but there's no such statement from you, and you are the one who are doing the cherry picking. common sense lah, why the acquiror wanna buy the LTAT block instead of the other single largest shareholder? amen.
Any new shareholder together with PAC where their total holding from zero to a trigger threehold of 33% will need to offer conditional MGO for the rest of share they do not hold.
To trigger offer to retail, acquirer must first strike a deal with LTAT for their 70%+, which can be a generous price… when mandatory triggers, they price term normally is % over VWAP, but as acquirer already controls more than 50%+1, no push factor for acquirer to successfully control the balance
6.03 Offer price (pg 48) (1) The offer price in a mandatory take-over offer must not be less than the highest price (excluding stamp duty and commission) paid or agreed to be paid by the offeror or persons acting in concert for any voting shares or voting rights to which the take-over offer relates, during the offer period and within six months prior to the beginning of the offer period.
(2) The offer price in a voluntary take-over offer must not be less than the highest price (excluding stamp duty and commission) paid or agreed to be paid by the offeror or persons acting in concert for any voting shares or voting rights to which the take-over offer relates, during the offer period and within three months prior to the beginning of the offer period.
Basically para 6.03(1) and (2) are the same except for the 6 months and 3 months period for MGO and VGO, respectively. Please learn on how to read on the definition of offer price.
Meanwhile, if the 3rd party negotiates on the block from the 2 largest shareholders then they will invoke GO the moment they ink the SSA (announcement will come out on the same day). This immediately trigger the MGO already.
Want to scold you but I sked you kennot take it since you have a big ego fragile heart. Best to simpan a bit if you are only purely speculating and spewing out some nonsense. Is okay to admit you are wrong, nothing to shy about something you are not so sure. We do cf, we know our shit okay? But one thing I gotta agree with you, rules are rules, not up to us to twist, so you dun twist further alright? You are wrong about the price that the offeror gotta pay to the minority offeree. I repeat, this price gotta be at least the same price as the price they paid to the Vendors.
Diu, u still don’t understand. Wht is the pre-requisite of mandatory take over? So if thinking u r getting the same offer as per LTAT makes u happy and at peace, so be it. You will NOT be getting the same offer!
We refer to the news article titled “Boustead said to be disposing of plantation arm” which appeared in The Edge Malaysia newspaper dated 19 June 2023.
The Company having made due inquiry with its Board of Directors, its major shareholders and all such person reasonably familiar with the matter, we wish to confirm that as of the date of this announcement, the Company is not aware of any agreement involving the Company entered into with the substantial shareholders.
The big contrast in the clarification on similar matter. Why can’t they be just explicit in the announcement as they did on 16/6 on the speculative BHPetrol disposal?
They are very careful on what to say -“ not aware of any agreement “ . Of course NO agreement yet . —————————————-
MEDIA STATEMENT CLARIFICATION ON THE SALE OF BHPETROL KUALA LUMPUR, 15 JUNE 2023 – Boustead Holdings Berhad (“BHB” or “the Group”) refers to the speculative news articles on the sale of Boustead Petroleum Marketing Sdn. Bhd., also known as BHPetrol. We wish to provide clarifications on the speculation based on unnamed sources in the article. It must be stressed that we have not had any material discussion to date on this matter and have not appointed any adviser for the reported potential corporate transaction as alleged. We also wish to clarify that the Group has not made any share purchase from the other shareholders of BHPetrol nor has it made any prior announcements on the matter.
It simply rubbished the The Edge's report. Did the reporter obtained credible informations for his article or he simply assembled "unverified information" gather from this forum and elsewhere? I stand corrected.
The Edge never said an agreement is reached to sell Bplant. The Edge only said Boustead is PREPARING to sell and invited proposals from a numbers of companies 2 weeks ago. Their 2 clarifications to Bursa on the same day do not clarify anything reported by The Edge.
If an Agreement has been reached, there is no need to clear the air.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
garethball
131 posts
Posted by garethball > 2023-06-20 14:48 | Report Abuse
that y we as a retailer must alert the operator games.