Posted by TECHfullyBREWED > 2015-09-28 13:54 | Report Abuse

Aemulus has successfully developed and deployed disruptive tech in a niche industry. Great prospects

Posted by pang72 > 2015-09-28 19:05 | Report Abuse

Consolidation....wait it build energy to go up

Posted by Pakcik Saham > 2015-09-29 07:54 | Report Abuse

buy on weakness..still long to go

Posted by Jason33 > 2015-09-29 08:01 | Report Abuse

what weakness? drop a bit only

Posted by misterzikk > 2015-09-29 08:16 | Report Abuse

46 and below must whack

Posted by misterzikk > 2015-09-29 17:09 | Report Abuse

Haih didn't get 45

Posted by Steve1983 > 2015-09-29 23:50 | Report Abuse

Yes. It is.

Posted by timing > 2015-09-30 00:20 | Report Abuse

steve, are you sure?

Posted by misterzikk > 2015-09-30 01:50 | Report Abuse

60% export, bro

Posted by k6ii > 2015-09-30 09:14 | Report Abuse

slowing climb up for good closing this month.

Posted by Steve1983 > 2015-09-30 10:54 | Report Abuse

Yes Timing. I am very sure. If you know who is their customer you will have faith in their company. One single lot of their customer share price is Rm 531000. They are serving this big player. Just 531K only you can buy 1 lot of their share.

Posted by Steve1983 > 2015-09-30 10:59 | Report Abuse

I am putting Rm 1.00 target price until next year. Will surely regret if don't buy when the dropping back time.

Posted by Samuel Ang > 2015-09-30 12:15 | Report Abuse

Kick lai liao

Posted by pang72 > 2015-09-30 12:26 | Report Abuse

Value cap injects capital to Aemulus?

Posted by banditos > 2015-09-30 13:34 | Report Abuse

pang72: still heavily invested in this counter huh? ;-)

Posted by Kim > 2015-09-30 14:56 | Report Abuse

Lets ride the golden horse :]]♧

Posted by pang72 > 2015-09-30 16:00 | Report Abuse

Black horse

Posted by ewawa > 2015-09-30 16:26 | Report Abuse

Damn good horse...in in in !!!

Posted by pang72 > 2015-09-30 16:28 | Report Abuse

60Sen as usual

Posted by ewawa > 2015-09-30 16:36 | Report Abuse

once others ppl realize this is a good horse, they r too late...the price will shoot up soon

Posted by pang72 > 2015-09-30 17:47 | Report Abuse

2nd wave Lai liao...

Posted by pang72 > 2015-09-30 17:48 | Report Abuse

Today looks local institute jump in. Felda went up following by aemulus.

Posted by pang72 > 2015-09-30 17:56 | Report Abuse

Inari up too for today. Stock related to Avago..all up

Posted by pang72 > 2015-09-30 17:58 | Report Abuse

Avago able to groom. Inari multiple high. Can it grow aemulus to the same high? Watch out

Posted by bjgdila123 > 2015-09-30 18:04 | Report Abuse

buy now b4 u jilat jari

Posted by JCAinOne > 2015-09-30 18:51 | Report Abuse

i dunknow is it good or no good...but i know they are hitting their target of sales...

Posted by Zbaikitree > 2015-09-30 20:57 | Report Abuse

where is the jwarren moron?


Posted by jwarren > Sep 27, 2015 02:47 PM | Report Abuse

Prior to my posting on Aemulus, I have not posted anything here for a long time because of rude, unreasonable and plainly abusive forummers. Seems like things didn't change much here.

A forummer such as "bursabullalways" is rude, abusive and rather lacking of the capacity to engage in logical and sensible discussion. A country made up of such type of persons would never progress.

I am not interested to challenge "bursabullalways" to a contest of who is right, who is wrong. The reason I am here is to share (and learn) about investing in public listed companies. However due to some rather misleading and some clearly factually incorrect matters shared by "bursabullalways", I have to list down below my counter-arguments for other forummers' information:


1. "VC would cash out in any listing, that is why they push for a listing. all ipo google Facebook grouponn whatever ipo no matter how grand, the vc by their own rules must cash out partial.."

- Bursabullalways' above comment is very misleading. While VC funds would need to liquidate their position eventually, they do have a time-frame to do so (typically up to one year) post IPO. The norm is that the VC funds would use this time-frame intelligently to draw the maximum profit by timing the market and importantly by gauging the future prospect of the company. Most VC funds are not "forced" to sell their shares by their limited partners (i.e. parties that put money in the VC fund) and neither do they set an automatic trigger to pare down. Fyi, most VC funds do not want to look "stupid" by selling at the wrong time (e.g. sell at a price that is way below the potential market price).


2. "VC is like a developer of property company, after they build rolls of houses, they will have to sell some, they won't keep all no matter how enticing, as they need the working capital."

- Again another "wrong" comment by "bursabullalways". The VC industry norm is that money returned from their investment would not be recycled (i.e. cannot be reused to invest again). Most VC fund would return the money back to their limited partners. Bursabullalways' suggestion that VC needs working capital clearly shows his lack of understanding of how VC fund works.


3. "read carefully and don't misquote chok of teak capital like all reporter misquoted our ministers speech. she said not exiting its investment ENTIRELY."

- In fact, the article shared by "bursabullalways" himself have given the impression that the substantial shareholder would stay invested in the company post-IPO in a meaningful way. But the reality is that after about one week post-IPO, the substantial shareholder has ceased to be a substantial shareholder. For other forummers who might not be aware, once a substantial shareholder ceased to be a substantial shareholder, the company is no longer required to make announcement of any change in the shareholder's shareholding. Therefore as of now (last trading day on last Friday), the previously substantial shareholder could be holding just a couple thousands of shares. We may only find out through access to the official share registry or wait for the top 20 shareholders' list in the annual report which will be out around Dec 2015!

4. "when FB going for listing, they don't even have earning.
same like Tweeter and all those. what r u talking about? current valuation is ahead? of proven companies? pls tell me which are the proven companies and what is their 2016 PE."

- To even suggest that Aemulus' case to be compared to Facebook and Twitter (which bursabullalways could not even spell correctly) is plainly an irresponsible act by "bursabullalways". I trust most other forummers know what I meant when I said Aemulus when compared to other similar companies (e.g. Vitrox, ELSOFT, Pentamaster).

- Since "bursabullalways" need to ask for P/E information, below are the estimates:

- VITROX: P/E ttm of 14.77
- ELSOFT: P/E ttm of 15.98
- Pentamaster: P/E ttm of 11.75
- Aemulus: P/E ttm of 18.7 (@ share price of RM0.515)

Posted by Zbaikitree > 2015-09-30 21:08 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by jwarren > 2015-09-30 22:41 | Report Abuse

First and foremost, "bursabullalways" is likely now known as "Zbaikitree" because "bursabullalways" has been banned from posting until 4 Oct 2015 due repeated abusive postings (you can verify this by looking at bursabullalways profile page).

Unfortunately "Zbaikitree" still continues to mislead and spew out inaccurate information.


Please refer to the below replies:

Zbaikitree: "VENTURE CAP DO NOT WANT TO LOOK "STUPID" BY SELLING AT THE WRONG TIME? WAKAKAKAKA. WHAT LOGIC. FOR A 2MILLION SEED CAPITAL CHOK HAS MADE 25MILLION PROFIT AT CURRENT PRICE. 1250% RETURN IN 5 YRS. STILL LOOK STUPID?"

- Reply: It is very clear that Zbaikitree did not even made an effort to read through the prospectus to get the proper information to calculate how much the VC fund made at the current price. For heaven's sake, please don't simply throw out a figure (of RM25mil) because the figure is far from being accurate. I will not provide the correct figure here because Zbaikitree should be showing to all how he calculated the figure of RM25mil. Perhaps more importantly is the fact that Zbaikitree has unwittingly demonstrated to all that the VC fund has made enough to start selling off and not take any further risk. Does Zbaikitree ever thought that maybe the VC fund feels the company is already fully valued or the share price is reaching frothy level? This is because based on "bursabullalways" premise that the share price can still go very much higher, why is the VC fund so eager to sell off now? Does it mean the VC fund purposely does not want to make more money? By the way, Aemulus will be closing its FYE2015 on 30 Sep 2015. Announcement of full year performance will be about 3 months from now. Why sell now if maybe in three more months, the share price can be very much higher?


Zbaikitree: "GO ASK CHOK, WAKAKAKA. THE FUND NOT RECYCLED? THE FUND IS NEEDED FOR NEW VENTURE WHY DO U THINK THEY CALL THEMSELVE VENTURE CAPITAL?
YOUR ANALOGY IS JUST LIKE A BANK ONCE THEY LOAN ONE TIME TO THE CUSTOMER THEY WILL RETURN THE CAPITAL TO THE SHAREHOLDER AND DO NOT LOAN TO ANOTHER CUSTOMER AGAIN? WAKAKAKAKAKA. WAKAKAAKAK. HOW STUPID AND SIMPLY COME OUT WITH EXPLAINATION."


- Reply: Again, Zbaikitree's above comment showed of his utter lack of understanding of how VC fund works. After the VC fund returned the money to the limited partner (shareholders of the fund), the VC fund manager will try to raise the next fund if it wants to continue to invest. Therefore, you can see some VC fund managers have multiple funds in succession (e.g. Fund I, Fund II, Fund III, Fund IV....). I advise Zbaikitree to read more about VC fund/investment before commenting further because his ignorance could lead others to be wrongly informed.


Zbaikitree: "WHERE? SHOW ME WHERE CHOK GIVE YOU IMPRESSION WOULD STAY IN MEANINGFUL WAY POST LISTING? THEY ONLY SAID THEY WONT EXIT ALL. MORON."


- Reply: I trust other forummers who read the article can form their own opinion on what is implied between the lines.


Zbaikitree: "MORON, FACEBOOK AND TWITTER IS USED AS AN EXAMPLE, AND YOUR SO MORON TO THINK I M COMPARING AEMULUS TO FACEBOOK?
SIMILAR COMPANIES? AEMULUS IS ONE OF ITS KIND IN MALAYSIA, THEY HAVE NO COMPETITOR IN MALAYSIA. SO STUPID JWARREN."


- Reply: Zbaikitree, again please don't mislead others and make comments without any regards to accuracy and truth. Aemulus does have competitors in Malaysia. In fact, in their prospectus there is an attached independent research report that stated Aemulus is one of the many ATE players in Malaysia. In the report, the below ATE players were listed as in the same industry/space as Aemulus:

1. Elsoft
2. MMS Ventures
3. Advantest
4. Circuit Check Asia
5. Keysight Technologies
6. LTX Credence
7. NI South East Asia
8. Tektronix Malaysia
9. Teradyne


As mentioned before, please know what you are trading. You may make money or lose money but always know the reason for it. Don't let others fool you.

Posted by Zbaikitree > 2015-09-30 23:05 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by Zbaikitree > 2015-09-30 23:07 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by Zbaikitree > 2015-09-30 23:11 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by Zbaikitree > 2015-09-30 23:18 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by 8Fit8 > 2015-10-01 05:54 | Report Abuse

Still can buy today? What is the TP? 60sen?

Posted by pang72 > 2015-10-01 08:00 | Report Abuse

Please ready for 55Sen today. Local fund continuous to pump in.

Posted by Андрей Андроников > 2015-10-01 12:11 | Report Abuse

point of entry 0.55

Posted by Kim > 2015-10-01 12:14 | Report Abuse

Golden horses =}}

Posted by lanternshark > 2015-10-01 12:15 | Report Abuse

bros, still holding this for long?i have some of this too.thinking whether should let go first or simpan dulu. the company looks good and the volume is not too bad though

Posted by Samuel Ang > 2015-10-01 12:22 | Report Abuse

lantern. my opinion, take profit before friday ends, buy in on monday.

Posted by apanama > 2015-10-01 12:23 | Report Abuse

will bring you PULUS..:)..PULUS IS money ..:)

Posted by 8Fit8 > 2015-10-01 12:25 | Report Abuse

Up up away!!!!!

Posted by lanternshark > 2015-10-01 12:26 | Report Abuse

apanama, haha.great pulus for aeMULUS ya?haha
samuel, yeah,i am thinking to do so but there is a calling asking me not to let go this goose.haha

Posted by Samuel Ang > 2015-10-01 12:28 | Report Abuse

if uptrend continues, you lose nothing . just slightly lesser profit. If it goes below 0.5 , you'll be stucked & rugi lo

Posted by KAQ4468 > 2015-10-01 12:28 | Report Abuse

EAPulus huyooooo ....huat woooo

Kaya kaya kaya

Congratulation

Posted by lanternshark > 2015-10-01 12:40 | Report Abuse

huat huat,clear some and waiting it to dip abit and buy in again!haha..still holding half though,go go aemulus~~~!

Posted by bjgdila123 > 2015-10-01 14:02 | Report Abuse

tp 0.61

Posted by Alpha Trader > 2015-10-01 14:58 | Report Abuse

80cents in 6 months, told you guys this is my second ifca

Posted by timing > 2015-10-01 15:53 | Report Abuse

damn big volume :D

Posted by pang72 > 2015-10-01 15:53 | Report Abuse

Bye bye.

Posted by CheapBigGood > 2015-10-01 15:57 | Report Abuse

yes!! i bought 0.55