jwarren>>This is because based on "bursabullalways" premise that the share price can still go very much higher, why is the VC fund so eager to sell off now? Does it mean the VC fund purposely does not want to make more money?
jwarren>> A substantial shareholder of the company has been selling down systematically since IPO! This is the same shareholder that mentioned before IPO that they would stay after IPO because of the growth story. Draw your own conclusions.
The current valuation is ahead of more established and proven "similar" companies. The company recorded only one solid year of growth (i.e. FYE2014 with RM8mil profit) prior to the IPO. The current 9 months profit is about RM7mil. If you go a little back further (i.e. last five years), you will see a better picture of the company's growth pattern and less than stellar performance.
The main story of the potential growth has been new models being rolled out and the semicon industry ramp-up. But are things so simple?
As usual, traders would trade with or without fundamental justifications. Some make money, some lose their pants. Always know the reason for your winning and your lost. Don't be a blind fool. 25/09/2015 23:17
1. Wow, from "bursabullalways" to "Zbaikitree" and now "zbaikitree2". Hopefully you won't get banned again from being rude and abusive. I have to admit that your tenacity is admirable....to take all the effort to create another profile (i.e. "zbaikitree2") at around 4pm today when Aemulus's share price was rising so that you could start to post comments of "see, i told you so! I am correct". I guess you are really desperate to prove yourself. But sorry to burst your bubble. If you thought today's share price rise meant that your comments were right/accurate, I think you have underestimated the intelligence of the forummers here.
2. You still have not provided a clarification on your previous remark that Aemulus has no competitors in Malaysia despite the company's prospectus suggested otherwise. Shooting from the hip? Or deliberately misleading others? Only you have the answer.
3. You still have not show how you have derived a figure of RM25mil as the money made by the VC fund. Just a hint to you, even at today's closing price of RM0.56, the correct figure is no where close to RM25mil. Again shooting from the hip? Or deliberately misleading others?
By the way, you have helped to draw "unwanted" attention to the VC fund because if the fund delayed last week's selling to today, they would have made easily another 10% to 12% (estimation). So either you (i.e. "zbaikitree2") is smarter or the VC fund is smarter. Only you have the answer.
4. Lastly thank you for re-posting my earlier posts. My underlying message has always been "Know what you are trading. You may make money or lose money but always know the reason behind it. Don't let others fool you". It is very sad to see some people try to mislead others (either through sheer ignorance or maybe with ill intention) to believe the shares that they are trading are undervalued based on "fundamentals" when the real situation is that the shares are overvalued due to hype and syndicate play. The misinformed or unsuspecting traders could be caught because they don't know the nature of their shares (i.e. fundamental stocks or speculative stocks). I sincerely hope "zbaikitree2" would stop being rude, abusive and most importantly stop misleading others. People's money are involved here.
For the forummers here, below is a calculation exercise example. Please use it as an academic reference only (and make your own judgement on the value of the share because each individual has different ways to perceive value versus risk):
i. Financial year is 1 Oct 2014 to 30 Sep 2015 (12 months) i.e. FYE2015
ii. 9 months of FYE2015, PAT is RM7mil.
iii. Q3 FYE2015, PAT is RM3.7mil.
iv. Approach A: Annualised RM7mil is equivalent to RM9.3mil
Approach B: RM7mil + RM3.7mil = RM10.7mil (assuming Q4 PAT is same as Q3 PAT)
Approach C: RM7mil + RM7mil = RM14mil (assuming Q4 PAT is equivalent to 9 months PAT)
v. Total shares outstanding = 438.9mil shares
vi. P/E ttm (Approach A) = 438.9 mil shares X RM0.56 / RM9.3mil = 26.4
P/E ttm (Approach B) = 438.9 mil shares x RM0.56 / RM10.7mil = 23.0
P/E ttm (Approach C) = 438.9 mil shares x RM0.56 / RM14mil = 17.6
vii. P/E ttm of ELSOFT = 16.5
P/E ttm of VITROX = 14.8
P/E ttm of MMS Venture = 9.4
P/E ttm of Pentamaster = 11.3
viii. Even if Aemulus achieved PAT of RM14mil for FYE2015 (i.e. the profit for the final quarter is equivalent to three quarters' PAT combined!), the current valuation (i.e. RM0.56 per share) is still higher than its peers on P/E ttm basis.
Using Alpha Trader's assumption of forward P/E of 15, growth of 40% (5% more than what he actually suggested of 35%) and FYE2015 PAT of RM15mil (even higher than RM14mil which is already a very optimistic figure):
Target price = 15 x (RM15mil x 1.40) / 438.9mil shares = RM0.72 (still lower than RM0.75)
As you can see from above, some prices being shouted here (e.g. "going to shoot above RM1.0mil", "at least RM0.80" and etc) have to be taken with serious care. This share has already moved into the territory of share price driven by "non-fundamental" factors. Trade wisely.
Something fishy...uma also going up. Ini betul2 goreng.... tak takut langsung... if bursa issue another uma habis lah... :( Don't play with fire lah...from history if UMA sure turun first...later after reply baru naik lah. Just be careful brothers...I always kena if I chasing at the peak...better safe than sorry.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
timing
726 posts
Posted by timing > 2015-10-01 15:57 | Report Abuse
pang72 why bye bye?