In short, i think the fundamental of the stock is JUST OK (definitely still long way to GOOD result) , more to kicks in after 6mths (operation of TE3).
There are few things to take note (non - business item) : i) TRES is an unknown, for Q1 is +38.9mil, Q2 is -21.9mil, Q3 is -8.8mil ii) Listing expenses tat has booked in is (79.5mil / 115mil), remaining 35mil. iii) The net cash of RM 3 billion (due to proceeds from IPO), can get interest income of 26mil/quarter (which is quite significant) iv) Loss in share of results of associates is Q1= - 2.5mil, Q2 = -16mil, Q3 = -18.6mil. v) Foreign Exchange is Q1 = 3.6mil, Q2= 12.3mil, Q3 = 11.2mil
From the above, the non-business item is quite significant to LCtitan net profit. Each item can impact the net profit by 5-15%. What's lucky is, there are some + item and - item, ended up they are offsetting each other.
Btw, LCTitan's margin is highly dependent on the Naphtha (raw material price) & PE, PP, BD, BZ (product selling price, which can be seen on pg 6 of their briefing).
The difference between product selling price & Naphtha is the crack.
From the observation, Oct 2017 is more or less like July 2017, except better BD gap, but has start narrowing in Oct. (Please note that for Jan - Mar 17, the BD crack are superb awesome, which believed are the reason of good profit for that Q).
In short, the existing crack/price are not so favorable (just similar to July 2017) to LCTitan.
I believe when the factory are back to normal, say 90% utilization rate, the PAT might reach about 350mil + assuming the crack spread are similiar.
However, it should be noted that utilization ration is not = profit.
Ok thanks spy008 for the info. I guess by rough deductive calculation, they could have hit at least close to 300mil if they had no maintenance to the NC1.
we can interprete the q report this way,there is a original LCtitan and enlarged LCtitan, for original LCTT , this result is excellent, but for enlarged LCTT, the result CAN BE considered lack lustre, there is why we saw some light selling.But we must also understand, for the enlarged LCTT, the new plants have NOT YET IN OPERATION in indonesia, so need to hold on for sometimes , before we see the final take-off.
@enning22, what new plants in Indonesia. tat 1 need more than 1 yr later. the new plant which is going to commence commercially is TE3, which is in Malaysia.
lctt, if you prefer, for clearification sake,it can be put into this way:before-IPO (original)or after-IPO( enlarged), merely for simplification sake for those with low IQ, don't misunderstand.
It's the Public Spread and Stock Price that's the issue now ! That is why the market maker buys and sell 1 lot at anytime just making sure no BIg Boys unloading their Holdings as the Uptrend Play is slowly making it's way up ! Just a measure of what should be the the market price for this Stock now after many IBs been calling at higher prices for this Stock with the lastest by TA of RM6.66 for it and CIMB's call of highest at RM8.35 (?) ! Local institution and Cornerstones price at IPO RM6.50 as per book. Since the Company is "NEW" as per IPO listing few months only, the PE ratio as of now is empirical still, so let's do it this way :
Latest NTA is RM5.06 + Listing Premium (say 5%) , so at least it should go above this lor ! Just my 2 cents view.
The thing is, though we know their plant utilisation rate... but we dunno their selling rate.
i.e. If they produce 77% of their max capacity, does that means that they actually sell off 100% of those produced? (or 90%? or 110%, old stocks) ?
If they ramp up the plant utilisation to 90%, will they still managed to sell out 100% of that 90%?
FY 2015, their production volume is 2,701 KTA (sales volume is 1,985 KTA, 74%) FY 2016, their production volume is 2,703 KTA (sales volume is 1,993 KTA, 74%)
Q2 FY 2017, production volume = 479 KTA (71% of 2,703/4 quarters) & sales is 367 KTA, 77% Q3 FY 2017, production volume = 520 KTA (77% of 2,703/4 quarters) sales is 439 KTA, 84%
1) From the above, we have learnt that their sales is not 100% (mayb that is not 100% true cause they have various product, but tat is a simplified way to understand the situation). Meaning to say, even they ramp up the production to 100%, it is "useless" unless the sales/demand can catch up.
2) Their average quarter sales volume is about 500 KTA, meaning to said the Q2 & Q3 2017 is under the average, this might due to the oversupply of Petrochemical market, but the sales:production volume is higher than average 74%.
Based on the latest commentary of prospects,
a) We anticipate that the petrochemicals market will continue to be resilient in the near term with demand growth for petrochemicals to outpace the rate of new supply additions in the region.[GOOD NEWS BUT WE DUNNO HOW TRUE IS THIS]
b) While olefins and derivative are expected to be slightly bearish as supply improved on the completion of regional cracker planned turnaround. [BAD NEWS]
c) Indonesia polyethylene plant load will remain low until polyethylene economics return. [BAD NEWS]
Therefore, i would say (WITHOUT BIAS & not HOO HAA & talk crap/sweet because i own this share) , even though WE ALL KNOW that their production volume is gonna ramp up due to no more maintenance and possibly new commencement of TE3, it does not guarantee that their net profit will be SUPERB. (but HIGHLY likely to be much better, but how much better is hard to justfiy/expect, mayb not even the management themselves.)
Afterall, they really really rely on the overall petrochemical supply & demand & price which is out of their control.
Its ok spy008, dont be too overly concern. You could estimate from the inventory level and sales to determine sell rate, but dont bother, its gonna be too cumbersome. My stand is that life is precious and short, things which are meticulous and complex, let it take its course. Furthermore, we only buy LCT, we do not work in there to recognize the intricacies and bottlenecks. Anyway thanks for the info. Whatever it is lets see whether the market maker will behave himself this evening or not.
Ok, now i get you, if you are a non substantial shareholder, I think it is 6% and below, you do not have to report. That is why if you look at Petron, you will not see any shareholder transaction being done, despite having institutional shareholders. There is no other substantial shareholder except Petron Corp Phil.via MIB (mayban inv) which holds 70%.
But if you are a principal officer or board member of the co, then you give notification of your intention to trade via bursa. If i am not mistaken reading it in the prospectus, total held by directors after IPO in LCT is less than 1%.
KUALA LUMPUR: Lower sales volume and higher unit production cost pulled down Lotte Chemical Titan Holding Bhd’s (LCT) net profit by 33.9% in the third quarter ended Sept 30, 2017 (3QFY17).
It reported a net profit of RM230.31 million compared with RM348.32 million in 3QFY16. Earnings per share fell to 10.42 sen from 20.16 sen.
Quarterly revenue was basically flat at RM2.02 billion compared with RM2.01 billion.
In a filing with Bursa Malaysia yesterday, LCT said the overall market started off moderately in 3QFY17 after the Hari Raya holidays.
It said market demand rebounded by late July following the Chinese government’s announcement to ban importation of plastic scrap by the end of 2017.
“The capacities taken offline caused by Hurricane Harvey in the US had temporarily affected supply from the US, especially to Latin America. The market was briefly lifted as concern over the supply disruption from US lingered. Meanwhile, supply from other regions was reportedly diverted to Latin America to fill the void,” it noted.
However, its group plant utilisation was lower at an average 77% in 3QFY17 compared with 92% in 3QFY16, mainly due to the statutory routine turnaround (every five to six years) for the Cracker 1 plant in Malaysia and Indonesia polyethylene plants load, which was reduced during the quarter under review due to poor polyethylene economics as a result of tight ethylene supply and high cost.
Still, the lower third-quarter performance dragged its cumulative net profit for the nine months ended Sept 30, 2017 (9MFY17) down by 33% to RM686.08 million from RM1.02 billion in 9MFY16. Revenue also fell 4.7% to RM5.71 billion in 9MFY17 from RM5.99 billion a year ago.
On prospects, LCT said it anticipates the petrochemicals market will continue to be resilient in the near term with demand growth for petrochemicals to outpace the rate of new supply additions in the region.
It expects its production output in 4QFY17 to be higher compared with 3QFY17 in view of the absence of any major planned plant shutdown and the expected commissioning of its new TE3 plant in 4QFY17.
“However, the Indonesia polyethylene plant load will remain low until polyethylene economics return,” it added.
Barring any unforeseen circumstances, LCT expects its performance for the financial year ending Dec 31, 2017, to be positive.
Gick, sometime within the last 2 months, the panda in Zoo negara returned to China as the duration on loan expired. But this Panda do not know about LCT becos he did not stop over at Korea. So what do you call a Panda who own shares of LCT? Your guess is as good as mine...kah,kah,kah
No offence intended super panda. Its just that haven't seen you around lately. What caught everybody by surprise is the timing of the release. Again LCT has shown it is the master of surprises!
Following is Maybank Research’s take on Q32017 result.
Quoted “The management will propose to Board for 2017 dividend to be 50% of reported net profit minus MYR 300m turnaround Capex. Based on our forecast, this will amount to 17sen/shr which equates to 3.3% yield at current share price. However, the Board will decide post full-year 2017 results and seek shareholder’s approval in the AGM.”
Given that PCHEM dividend yield is 2.57%, at similar dividend yield Titan is worth ~RM6.72. That should however act as the ceiling to dividend based valuation, given the premium PCHEM should deserve with its superior returns.
Sometime i feel certain people just exaggerate some news. Maybe their intention to collect cheap share. Did u know that burst pipe last week somewhere in plentong, 20km away from pasir gudang?..somebody potrayed to make it looks like juz beside the titan....repaired immediately and settle within hour...talk about fire..then, at the end juz small fire...
According to news..affected area is kulai, kota tinggi and johor bahru...but i can confirmed with you, no water disruption in johor bahru so far...by the way..titan in pasir gudang district
Well there are rogue nations, there are rogue leaders, so the existence of rogue traders comes as no surprise. Using basic mathematics 101, integration will show rogues summation eventually create rogue nations. I pray that we are not!
Lotte Chemical Titan Holding Bhd (Oct 27, RM5.19) Maintain buy with a lower target price (TP) of RM6.66:
Lotte Chemical Titan Holding Bhd’s nine months of financial year 2017 (9MFY17) core profit of RM717 million (-29% year to date [YTD]) was within our expectations, but below consensus — accounting for 72% and 65% of full-year forecasts respectively. Lotte Chemcial staged a remarkable sequential rebound, where core profit surged 35% quarter-on-quarter, as plant utilisation recovered to 77% (second quarter of FY17 [2QFY17]: 71%). On top of this, recall that 2QFY17 was impacted by water supply interruption or 11 days. Additionally, higher interest income from initial public offering (IPO) proceeds amounting to RM26 million, boosted profits.
To a lesser extent, the bottom line was also propped up by lower taxes. The stellar comeback was in spite of a dip in 3QFY17 volumes from Indonesia. Recall that ethylene feedstock for Lotte Chemical’s polyethylene (PE) plants in Indonesia is mainly sourced externally. US capacity shutdowns due to Hurricane Harvey had led to a surge in ethylene pricing. Therefore, Lotte Chemcial scaled down PE production in Indonesia following the dip in PE spreads. To recap, Indonesian PE accounts for 22% of FY16 revenue. Exceptional items excluded from 9MFY17 core profit include: i) PPE write-off s: RM39 million; ii)reversal of administration expenses for Lotte Chemical USA: RM15 million; iii) initial IPO expenses: RM14 million; iv) foreign exchange gains: RM28 million; and v) fair value gains: RM9 million.
YTD bottom-line contraction was mainly attributed to lower volumes and higher unit production costs due to the water incident in April 2017. Recall that in 9MFY17, there was statutory turnaround at both of Lotte Chemical’s naphtha crackers for a total of 86 days. Additionally, volumes were also affected by the water incident, and reduced output from Indonesia. The above more than off set higher product average selling prices ( 20% YTD), lower taxes and increased interest income.
Key takeaways from a conference call: Management is optimistic about achieving strong utilisation of 90% for its Malaysian plants in 4Q17. This is underpinned by completion of all statutory turnaround, with no shutdowns scheduled for 4Q17. On a dim note, PE output from Indonesia is expected to be lower due to weak price-earnings margins. Also, management expects 4Q17 demand to be resilient, underpinned by higher demand from Latin America until the supply from the US market recovers. Recall that US ethylene crackers were shut down at end-3Q17 due to hurricanes. Development of TE3 and PP3 projects are on track with 100% and 42% mechanical completion respectively. TE3’s targeted commercial launch date of 4Q17 remains intact despite a fire incident.
— TA Securities Holdings Bhd, Oct 27
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
newbie92
418 posts
Posted by newbie92 > 2017-10-27 06:18 | Report Abuse
Wow,net cash Over Rm 3 Billion, still not enough to attract buyer?