Ports around world turn away vessels as crew from south Asian country contract disease
Ports including Singapore, pictured, have barred ships from changing crew members who have recently travelled from India
India’s huge wave of Covid-19 infections has hit the international shipping industry, which relies on the country for seafarers, as crews come down with the disease and ports deny entry to vessels.
Ports including Singapore and Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates have barred ships from changing crew members who have recently travelled from India, notices from maritime authorities show. Zhoushan in China has banned the entry of ships or crew that have visited India or Bangladesh in the past three months, according to Wilhelmsen Ship Management, a crew provider.
Industry executives also said that crews coming from India were testing positive for Covid-19 on ships, despite quarantining and testing negative before boarding.
“Earlier we had ships that were infected with one or two people,” said Rajesh Unni, chief executive of Singapore-based Synergy Marine Group, which provides ship crew. “Today, we have a scenario where whole ships are being infected very quickly . . . which means the ships themselves are immobilised.”
India on Thursday reported more than 410,000 Covid-19 infections and almost 4,000 deaths over the previous day. A surge in cases has broken global records and overwhelmed health systems.
India’s wake up call to the world
South Africa’s port authority said a vessel that arrived in Durban from India this week was quarantined after 14 Filipino crew tested positive for Covid-19. The ship’s chief engineer died of a heart attack.
Along with the Philippines and China, India is one of the world’s largest sources of sea crew. About 240,000 of an estimated 1.6m seafarers globally are from the country, according to International Chamber of Shipping, an industry body
Singapore, a big shipping hub, has widened its ban to cover crew from countries including Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Executives warned the restrictions could send shockwaves through the stretched shipping industry, which transports 80 per cent of global trade, according to UN data.
March’s Suez Canal blockage “will be nothing compared to the [supply chain] disruption coming from being unable to change crews”, said Mark O’Neil, president of InterManager, which represents the crew management industry.
Last summer, about 400,000 seafarers were stranded at sea beyond their contract length because of the pandemic. While that number has fallen, fears are growing due to the global surge in coronavirus cases since March.
“If the travel restrictions continue as they are, we could once again be in a similar situation to the global crew change crisis that we saw in 2020,” said Niels Bruus, head of marine human resources at Maersk, the world’s largest container shipping company.
“The situation has gone from bad to worse when it comes to crew changes. And that’s an understatement,” said Carl Schou, chief executive of Wilhelmsen, which sources 15 per cent of its approximately 10,000 workers from India.
The Norwegian-owned company stopped crew changes in India from April 24 until at least the end of May. Schou added that Covid-19 test results for Indian sailors were not coming through in time for their scheduled departures since “the whole health system has basically collapsed in India”.
Bernhard Schulte Shipmanagement, a German crew management group, said it was temporarily drafting in seafarers from other nations to replace Indians disembarking or scheduled to board ships.
Shipping executives said that seafarers needed to be prioritised in the global vaccination rollout as countries introduce inoculation requirements to enter. But they have been frustrated by the slow pace of efforts to secure jabs through the International Maritime Organization, the UN body responsible for shipping.
“We’re simply tearing our hair out with the bureaucracy and political ping-pong going over this issue of vaccinations,” said O’Neil.
March’s Suez Canal blockage “will be nothing compared to the [supply chain] disruption coming from being unable to change crews”, said Mark O’Neil, president of InterManager, which represents the crew management industry.
Last summer, about 400,000 seafarers were stranded at sea beyond their contract length because of the pandemic. While that number has fallen, fears are growing due to the global surge in coronavirus cases since March.
“If the travel restrictions continue as they are, we could once again be in a similar situation to the global crew change crisis that we saw in 2020,” said Niels Bruus, head of marine human resources at Maersk, the world’s largest container shipping company.
..........
China will be forced to replace shortage from India, all ports enroute from China to Europe will be super congested....
I don't think take profit before QR release is good idea, as QR is highly possibility to be good, you might lose the next day gap up open opportunity. I only consider take like half profit if it goes super high prior QR release, which the QR might not be able to live up to that valuation
As mentioned EPF has the tendency to dispose at the high. For the month of April till date, over RM350M worth of glove shares have been disposed.
The recent accumulations (8th Apr, 20th Apr, 4th May) may well be them. However we will not know until the 5% (150M) shareholding is triggered.
Something is happening. (Look at Maersk's record breaking share price)
EPF holdings 30-3-21 to 03-05-2021
Topglove Disposal 26,909,500 Balance 474,489,266
Harta Disposal: 11,698,000 Balance: 242,427,389
Kossan Disposal: 32,979,100 Balance: 200,185,200
petnch2020
EPF also panic sell back in Mar 2020 bringing down their holdings from 153 mil to 53mil as of end mar 20. And since then their holdings has remain constant. As of 19 mar 2021 they still hold 54mil shares. It seems that the one that has been buying shares sold by our institution are foreign funds which is good as i think they are more value oriented.
@pinky in most other situation I agree, but for current mmc situation is that booming of price is long overdue and it can happen at anytime, you might miss the opportunity if it happens when you lock profit. you might be correct if you locked some profits at previous high at 1.17 - 1.19, but you never know that is the correct decision only after it going back to 1.13 / 1.14 below which you can reenter. if me, I would rather just hold tight, not doing any in and out which I cannot predict the future price movement, and save some unnescessary brokerage fee too at the same time. Rm1.50 above is short term target price due before or days after QR release.
this is all true provided QR result is not totally out of expectation that it actually turn out to be bad
ya, laggard counter, maybulk, harbour, freight...moving up d, this MMC still zzz...something is not right here...i agreed with pinky to set a profit target and lock some profit first...i remembered months ago many said it will fly to moon but ended up stopped at 1.2 sth then gg to 0.9 sth....
@Superb99 last time 1.2 to 0.9 is after last QR new high's peak. Now it is pre QR with spoiled good result. Rallying to new high as it comes closer to QR release. Totally different situation, nothing can force it down when it is so close to immenent good QR release
Rising COVID-19 cases dents sentiment...but the market will realise that MMC is largely unaffected and has in fact delivered improved performance even during the pandemic in FY2020
Actually we can know epf position after the quarterly result. Management usually prepare a presentation deck providing a summary to the quarter result performance. Anyway, they normally prepare a slide on the major shareholders of MMC. We can see then whether epf % ownership has moved. They only list major local institutional investors. Other investors are lump in "Retailer" (this includes Mr Lam) and "Foreign".
Pinky,
I think Mr Lam bought his block of shares when epf and urusharta were dumping it back in March 2020. Both epf and urusharta were selling in high volume at price below 70 sens. The share price did reach a low of less than 50 sens but volume was not high. I think it was an opportunistic move by Mr Lam. His average cost should be between 60 sens to 70 sens. I wonder if he is actually a proxy to someone else.....
Saw the quarterly slides. Thanks! We'll know soon if EPF's position has changed from 1.77%. (AIA disposed 2.2% between 31st Jan and 19th Mar 2021. Another buy high sell low.)
@speakup what is your motive? it is common for MSWG to query such things as it is their job, sure MMC can answer that at their AGM. it is not like MMC management is proven guilty or anything as of now
Obviously speakup is just a daily short term trader which hope the share price plunge, so he can buy more as he is interested in this stock, else why he so free spread such a news. Its a good thing that MSWG raised a question to the Mgmt. And these impairment already impaired of > RM100 mil in FY 2020, and if subsequently reverse in future might be even better to the Company's profit
not sure about will have the announcement or not. so far mmc have never confirm the news about the ipo. last time theedge report also according to their insider sources only..
" Elsewhere, MSWG also queried MMC Corporation Bhd with regard to its accumulated impairment losses on other receivables that has ballooned to RM200.7 mil in FY2020 (FY2019: RM92.6 million).
“What were the reasons for the high impairment losses on other receivables? What was the nature of these impairment losses and what actions have been taken to recover the said amount?” asked MSWG.
On the same note, the shareholder activism group also wanted to know percentage of impairment losses of RM200.7 mil that is expected to be uncollectable.
“To which business segment does the impaired other receivables relate to? How much of the impaired other receivables have been recovered to-date?” asked MSWG.
MMC Corp will stage its 45th AGM at its head office in Wisma Budiman, Kuala Lumpur on May 10 (Monday) at 10am. – May 7, 2021 "
1. Firstly, it is important to note that the impairments referred to by MSWG's questions have already been accounted in MMC's P&L for Financial Year Ending 31 December 2020
> Expected credit loss of claim receivable and other receivables of the Group are measured at amortised cost. Impairment assessment is assessed using the expected credit loss (“ECL”) model on a forward looking basis. The expected credit loss charge to the Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended 31 December 2020 amounted to RM137 million, out of which, RM108 million relates to claim receivable of a subsidiary (“claim receivable”) as described in Note 3(e).
In relation to the claim receivable, the probability weighted ECL requires judgement to determine multiple probable outcomes and assign percentages of probability to each of those outcomes.
The degree of judgement required for the impairment assessment on the claim receivable may result in a material adjustment to the financial statements.
Refer to Notes 3(e) and 23 in the financial statements.
> 3(e) Impairment of claim receivable of a subsidiary, MMC International Holdings Ltd.
In determining whether the expected credit loss of claim receivable (included in other receivables of the Group) in respect of a discontinued involvement in a project in Middle East is recoverable, the debtor’s ability to pay the amount claimed by the Group had been assessed. The impairment loss on the amount claimed requires judgements on the assumption of recoverability based on latest developments.
> 23 Other receivables Other receivables represent sundry receivables and non-interest bearing. Loss allowance is assessed for other receivables individually. The Group and the Company have provided an allowance of RM211,863,000 (2019: RM101,356,000) and RM334,000 (2019: nil) respectively for impairment of its other receivables that are not considered recoverable.
2. Secondly, the carrying amount of the Trade and Other Receivables (Non-Current) as at 31 December:
2020: RM 43.321 million* (Trade receivables: RM 15 mil; Other receivables: RM 23.44 mil) 2019: RM 115.654 million
In other words, it has been substantially impaired and there is little left
*Eventhough MSWG only enquires on the Accumulated impairment loss of RM200.7 mil in FY2020 (FY2019: RM92.6 million) on Other receivables, to be conservative we include the carrying amount for both the Non-current Trade receivables and Other receivables - Refer to Note 23 of MMC's Annual Report 2020
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
probability
14,496 posts
Posted by probability > 2021-05-07 13:55 | Report Abuse
India’s Covid surge rocks global shipping industry
https://www.ft.com/content/cf40d764-6ab6-4638-bea6-594cc3cd5d53
Ports around world turn away vessels as crew from south Asian country contract disease
Ports including Singapore, pictured, have barred ships from changing crew members who have recently travelled from India
India’s huge wave of Covid-19 infections has hit the international shipping industry, which relies on the country for seafarers, as crews come down with the disease and ports deny entry to vessels.
Ports including Singapore and Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates have barred ships from changing crew members who have recently travelled from India, notices from maritime authorities show. Zhoushan in China has banned the entry of ships or crew that have visited India or Bangladesh in the past three months, according to Wilhelmsen Ship Management, a crew provider.
Industry executives also said that crews coming from India were testing positive for Covid-19 on ships, despite quarantining and testing negative before boarding.
“Earlier we had ships that were infected with one or two people,” said Rajesh Unni, chief executive of Singapore-based Synergy Marine Group, which provides ship crew. “Today, we have a scenario where whole ships are being infected very quickly . . . which means the ships themselves are immobilised.”
India on Thursday reported more than 410,000 Covid-19 infections and almost 4,000 deaths over the previous day. A surge in cases has broken global records and overwhelmed health systems.
India’s wake up call to the world
South Africa’s port authority said a vessel that arrived in Durban from India this week was quarantined after 14 Filipino crew tested positive for Covid-19. The ship’s chief engineer died of a heart attack.
Along with the Philippines and China, India is one of the world’s largest sources of sea crew. About 240,000 of an estimated 1.6m seafarers globally are from the country, according to International Chamber of Shipping, an industry body
Singapore, a big shipping hub, has widened its ban to cover crew from countries including Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Executives warned the restrictions could send shockwaves through the stretched shipping industry, which transports 80 per cent of global trade, according to UN data.
March’s Suez Canal blockage “will be nothing compared to the [supply chain] disruption coming from being unable to change crews”, said Mark O’Neil, president of InterManager, which represents the crew management industry.
Last summer, about 400,000 seafarers were stranded at sea beyond their contract length because of the pandemic. While that number has fallen, fears are growing due to the global surge in coronavirus cases since March.
“If the travel restrictions continue as they are, we could once again be in a similar situation to the global crew change crisis that we saw in 2020,” said Niels Bruus, head of marine human resources at Maersk, the world’s largest container shipping company.
“The situation has gone from bad to worse when it comes to crew changes. And that’s an understatement,” said Carl Schou, chief executive of Wilhelmsen, which sources 15 per cent of its approximately 10,000 workers from India.
The Norwegian-owned company stopped crew changes in India from April 24 until at least the end of May. Schou added that Covid-19 test results for Indian sailors were not coming through in time for their scheduled departures since “the whole health system has basically collapsed in India”.
Bernhard Schulte Shipmanagement, a German crew management group, said it was temporarily drafting in seafarers from other nations to replace Indians disembarking or scheduled to board ships.
Shipping executives said that seafarers needed to be prioritised in the global vaccination rollout as countries introduce inoculation requirements to enter. But they have been frustrated by the slow pace of efforts to secure jabs through the International Maritime Organization, the UN body responsible for shipping.
“We’re simply tearing our hair out with the bureaucracy and political ping-pong going over this issue of vaccinations,” said O’Neil.