Guys tell me where to get info about Prolexus rights issue? Please thanks. Cursory glance says this could be a good long term hold, now to decide how much lower it goes and to delve further into the financial statements and business outlook.
Guys I'm reading the AR, when they say Vietnam plant commissioned in H2 2017...does it mean that's when they plan to start building it, or that's when the plan to have had completed it?
Prolexus latest Q2-2017, compare Q-o-Q it is +9% increased revenues, +20.5% PBT, +9% Net Profits, and 7.02% NPM, same.
Compare to Q1-2017, it is +24.4% increased revenues, +41.8% PBT, +18.8% Net Profits, and NPM decreased slightly from 7.36%.
This shows that this Q2 results is quite good, both in terms of Q-o-Q and Q-2-Q. But Mr.Market is doing injustice to Prolexus share prices today...
The Company's cautious statement about "uncertainty of global economic conditions" may be the cause. But look at it this way, isn't this conditions going to affect most companies in Malaysia? Then why a good performance stock like Prolexus take Mr.Market's beating while others are enjoying the market's bull run? Does this make sense?
IMHO, this is a glaring example of Mr.Market's inefficiency.
Niki, AmSec cut their TP by reducing PER from 12 to 10, because they anticipate slower than expected growth until 2018 when their new factories in Vietnam and Johor will be operated.
niki & R40s, this is also the question that puzzled me.
"commissioned" should mean start operation usually. but up till Jan 2017, their money allocated to build both factory in Vietnam and Kluang is still mostly untouched.
and they did state the new plant will start seeing contribution in FY2018.
which raise the question, does their "commission" means start the building process?
guys... i do agree with what noah said.. i also noticed that they havent used much of the allocations for factory expansion in Vietnam and Kluang.
with this, what the AmSec report mentioned may be more accurate: Q1 2018 - Vietnam apparel factory to start operation and to contribute revenue/profit Q2 2018 - Kluang fabric mill to start operation and to contribute revenue/profit
I think it is not so possible for any of these 2 plants to start operation within 2017...
perhaps that is why many investors/speculators do not enter yet and would rather wait till early 2018...
but bear in mind, it may be the best time to enter now coz the price may also hike up to a certain % by early 2018.. Mr market is not stupid... but for those short-term speculators, they do not care.. they just want to go in and out quick and a 5-10% profit is good enough for them so they dont bother entering at a higher price...
but for us value investors, we buy at discounted price vs its EV/EBIT & high ROIC, and just wait... to achieve a more attractive gain then just a 5-10% profit...
so it is up to you... no right or wrong... it's just the different way/methodology of your investment
haha... you guys are flattering me.. i am just a super ordinary investor like anyone of you...
in fact, there are also some ppl who do not agree with what I said in other forums...
I am fine with disagreement as everyone has different points of view...
what I can't tolerate is their unethical way of providing manipulated/misleading info in order to promote another share (example: go to Evergreen forum you will find out one particular loser/joker who is doing this)...
everyone there knows his personal agenda yet he is still acting like a clown there.. sometimes i really feel sorry for him... haha
The Q2 report did not mention any delay in the factories construction, under the report's pg.8 Section-12 :
12. Capital commitments As at the reporting date, the capital commitment of the Group is as follows: Property, plant and equipment: - Authorised and contracted for 27,306 - Authorised but not contracted for 99,840
So the rm27.3M funds was already committed and contracted out for construction of the new factories. The estimated total costs of the factory buildings is rm30.5M (rm13.5M Vietnam, rm17M Johor), shows that the work progress is still on track because factory building must be completed before M&E works and machinery installations can start, also, bear in mind that the Q2 report cutoff date is 2 months ago at 31.1.2017.
The AmInvest report also said they are on track but gave a different dates (Q1 & Q2 2018) from Company's projected dates (Q3 & Q4 2017), so whose dates should we trust?
I think the Company's dates should be more reliable as they are answerable to the dates given in their prospectus.
(Past tense: commissioned; past participle: commissioned) 1. Give an order for or authorize the production of (something such as a building, piece of equipment, or work of art).
2. Bring (something newly produced, such as a factory or machine) into working condition.
So the Company's wording "Fully Commissioned" should means that the date of factory start-up and production.
Btw, note the AmInvest made an error in the latest Book Value of rm1.23 instead of rm1.33, and gave P/BV = 1.1 instead of 1.02. Does that mean they have underestimated the fair value by 10 sen or more...?
It's still a bit crazy to me. Start building in 2017 and have it ready in 2018. Can meh? I thought it will need to take time to build and scale up. Or maybe I am thinking of too high tech stuff (like Tesla's plants). So how long would a factory like they are building in Vietnam or the mill in Malaysia take to make normally? Is 6 mths - 1 year a reasonable timeframe to get everything built and ready for production?
Started in Q3 & Q4 2017, commission in Q3 & Q4 2017, so minimum 1 year, maximum can be up to 15 months, if start date is early Q3/Q4-2016, and late Q3/Q4-2017 commission. Submission for factory design approval started earlier...
Factory buildings are very simple structures, and sewing machines are standard equipment that can be installed quickly, so 1-year timeframe is achievable...
Sctan, agreed, initial few months would produce less because of new operators skill and learning curve, or installing production lines in stages while waiting for new job orders to increase, in order to minimize capacity underutilization.
But nevertheless, the initial production should significantly boost up the revenues and profits after the new factory startup and then increase production gradually.
Yes, it's very good for us to share information, analysis and opinions. Even if our opinions may differ, but it's useful to know other's opinions, as long as they are not malicious...
Take for example Tomypak's latest Q4-2016 report to see two issues discussed by us above :
1. Company Prospects -- see page-12, #3, the same kind of statement is used, "forthcoming year is expected to be difficult and challenging given the continuing uncertainties of the global economy as well as volatile foreign exchange rate". This sounds even worse than Prolexus statement...
2. Utilization of RI proceeds vs Factory's construction: see page-13, #6, Tomypak's RI was also done in June last year, their new factory was completed in Dec.2016 and commissioned in Jan.2017, but the rm57.4M proceeds still showed balance unutilized of rm17.3M in 31.Dec.16 or 30% balance. This show that the balance sum cannot reflect the actual construction's progress. Because progress payments are often made several months after the actual progress.
Sctan, I agree that the first few months after startup the revenue will increase even if only half capacity is utilized because of lower productivity of new operators initially, and job orders may take time to buildup, but profits maybe higher, only the "profit margin" maybe lower, or maybe even this also may not be lower because the new factory will get higher tax incentives, and when the new fabric plant start to supply materials "in-house", the profit margin will become higher...
in my opinion, management will not change the outlook from 'stable' to 'challenging' simply for nothing. they would have sensed some challenges with the reducing orders from UA.
But in fact if you look closer, UA is still growing, just that at a slower rate. The problem is their OEM factory across the world is increasing their capacity exceeding their growth which leads to reducing profit margin.
PRLEXUS still have an advantage as they still have Nike as their another major client.
Based on interview with PRLEXUS chairman, he state its not easy to be OEM factory for those brand, they require a very high requirements to be and maintained. They will audit the factory from time to time and so far they are satisfy with PRLEXUS's performance.
so new competitor would not just appear suddenly. those brand perfer to stick to their existing partner which have years of relationship.
and furthermore, its not feasible for Trump to move clothing industries back to US as its very labour intensive. Uniclo chairman even state that they would rather EXIT US MARKET if Trump ask them to move their factory to US.
To me I don't think you can read too much into their outlook statement. Management will always like to overperform, so they set modest expectations. Initially I will be alarmed when management say things like this, but often the next quarter or next full FY they do very well.
They just want to keep expectations in check. I mean read most of the outlook in quarterly reports for other companies...they are extremely conservative.
Trump has declared Malaysia as one of 12 countries he will build a case against in his latest executive order. US heavy export companies may see a pullback on Monday.
well said guys.. i think each of you have a point here... I personally do not think this kind of labor intensive business will be moved back to the US...
One of the challenge is automation but it require a lot of capital investment and does not bring lots of job back to us. And take note that even trump owned fashion brand manufacture in overseas
Wow.. Excellent growth of NIKE. QoQ and EPS keep on increasing. Does this reflect PRLEXUS coming result? I trust the data below will prove it to you.
NIKE, INC. REPORTS FISCAL 2017 THIRD QUARTER RESULTS • Revenues up 5 percent to $8.4 billion; 7 percent growth on a currency-neutral basis* • Diluted earnings per share up 24 percent to $0.68 • Inventories up 7 percent as of February 28, 2017
NIKE, INC. REPORTS FISCAL 2017 SECOND QUARTER RESULTS • Revenues up 6 percent to $8.2 billion; 8 percent growth on a currency neutral basis* • Diluted earnings per share up 11 percent to $0.50 compared to prior year • Inventories up 9 percent as of November 30, 2016
Prolexus is a big big laggard in this ongoing Bursa Rally, despite very sound fundamentals with Single-digit PER, P/BV 1.05, average CAGR > 10%, 2 new factories ready by this year, etc., prices still remain at Rm1.40+/- in the last 4 months... Now is time for Prolexus to start it's run...
Depends. I think profits could decline leading to fall in share price in the short term. Good long term though. I missed the boat at 1.36, won't come in unless the stock reaches that low again.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
nikicheong
2,559 posts
Posted by nikicheong > 2017-03-28 21:10 | Report Abuse
Guys tell me where to get info about Prolexus rights issue? Please thanks. Cursory glance says this could be a good long term hold, now to decide how much lower it goes and to delve further into the financial statements and business outlook.