Actually looking at it further Prlexus could still be a buy. Long-form ROE is ~20% which should correlate to roughly 2.1x BV. When plant comes on board it will contribute the extra ROE. At 1.1x BV currently there is ample built in margin of safety. Undecided, but Prlexus is back on my list for my next stock purchase.
The textile and garment sector enters the second quarter (Q2) of this year with promising signs. Statistics showed that the sector earned US$6.75 billion from exports in the first quarter of this year, growth of 12.4 per cent compared with the same period last year...
This is good news for Prolexus, because their new Vietnam factory will be commissioned by end of this year, their productions will be in time to catch this increasing demand, and should start to contribute positively to the bottom lines... :-)
Guys, I have something very urgent. Why is there discrepancies in the Net Assets Per Share for Prolexus?
In Q4 2016 (ended 31 Jul 16) financial statement they have the Net Asset Per Share at RM1.17. However for the annual report 2016 they have the NAPS at RM1.23.
Similarly, for the latest Q2 2017 (ended 31 Jan 2017) financial statement their NAPS is listed at RM1.33. However on i3Investor's T4Q NAPS is listed as RM1.27.
Can somebody please explain the discrepancies? These matter.
Can anyone please clarify as to how does Prolexus get the figure of Net Assets Per Share of RM1.33 from their latest quarterly statement ended 31 Jan 2017? I would greatly appreciate it. My calculations just don't work out.
JS Goh answered your questions in your 2nd post. Here I try to answer your questions earlier about the "discrepancies" you found on the NTA: I believe it's due to the effects after the RI in June-2016, after taking into account of the funds raised from the RI, the NTA has increased.
The Rm1.33 is the NTA as per the latest QR, whereas the i3's value is based on the last 4Q's weighted average over the 12 months period. Hope this help.
You were asking how did they get those figure so I just plug the figure into the formula hahahah XD. I have no idea if there's any other formula. Enlighten me...
JS Goh, you may back test the formula with previous quarters. It doesn't match up.
The usual formula is (Total Assets - Total Liabilities - Non-Controlling Interest)/Number of shares outstanding
Plus with you formula it is 1.34 not 1.33.
You can backtest your formula, it won't work. Mine if I backtest to 2013-2014 it works, but ever since they did the bonus and rights issue it stopped working.
I think you have a point there when they mention "ordinary" shareholder
Anyway they did put a disclaimer. But I wasn't sure what was the number they are using * Comparative number of shares was restated to take into account the effect of Rights Issue.
I KIV Prolexus, for now I got Heveaboard. I sense Prolexus will consolidate downwards, and will swoop in at RM1.45-RM1.50. Only keeping tabs on a few other counters with compelling stories.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Money
233 posts
Posted by Money > 2017-04-21 21:24 | Report Abuse
Look like 1.50 is cleares today