Future growth? This is something that no one can guarantee just as downtrend or uptrend of gloves also cannot be guaranteed although the curve is pointing downwards. Correct? Can joyvest guarantee future growth of a company? This a typical person trying to be smart to preach his belief to others.
In my opinion and based on the my earlier computation of equivalent linear compounded growth rates of 52 % for 6 years , supermx PE should be at least 6 based on FY 2021 EPS of 140 s. If we based on normalised and stabilised ASP of US 30 and its EPS of about 57 sen, a PE of at least 18 por 20 should be given and add another RM1 for the super.dividend receive during the. pandemic period. Tomorrow, I will show how the IB s had ignored or omitted some key historical facts on net margins when they compute the earnings for FY 23 and FY 24 .
---------------------------------
In fact pjseow, SpmX share price should be ard 6.00 if not bcos of the shortist who keep pressing down. I mean its not too demanding to expect at least PE4 for such high profita and with the pandemic still ravaging many parts of the world. 05/09/2021 6:36 PM
yup pjseow, I agree all the way with you. Its just that with the shortists aggressively attacking and pressing all the Big4 down, I be happy if can bounce back to 6.0 level for now.
@joyvest Any PE of more than 3 is just a fantasy.Your self deceiving is more than your loss... 05/09/2021 6:52 PM
Hey joyvest, you have very shallow understanding of what you are talking about so better shut up and pay attention to pjseow's calculation and reasoning.
@Stealth We can all see how desperate the shortists are!! Haha! They will all fall flat on their faces with their feces!!! 05/09/2021 8:10 PM
Yup Stealth, their desperation is becoming more apparent by the day. As I pointed out earlier, they got someone in Bursa to add in some irrelevant ETF stocks to jumble up the Big4 short positions at the top of the table. They try to hide the fact that they have been shorting the Big4 big time. I mean with such major manipulation of the Big4, shouldn't Bursa do something about it? This can be investigated under some anti-trust law, where there is alrdy unfair financial monopoly practice being carried out. Maybe Bursa need to revise the RSS limit to 3% instead of current 4%. If the reasoning for RSS is to create a more dynamic trading activities then at 3% trading will be even more dynamic, as there would be better competition between retailers and short sellers.
MoneyMakers Future (-) growth is crystal clear..so far ASP nonstop drop - confirm will translate to very low profit 05/09/2021 10:35 PM
You are trying to be smarter than joyvest? Hello! Supermax future growth was crystal clear last year that was why it shot up to RM26. See how much is it now? ASP of gloves nonstop that maybe true but future is yet to be seen as demand for gloves is still growing.
Israel is planning to administer FOURTH Covid shot which could be adjusted to fight new variants as country battles wave of infections despite hugely successful vaccine roll-out
It comes as the country deals with soaring cases despite blazing a trail on jabs
The country's national coronavirus czar says people should expect to receive a new vaccination against the virus more frequently - 'every five to six months'
Israel expected to give out vaccines that have been specially adapted to cope with different variants of the coronavirus by late 2021 or early 2022, he says
Many IBs started to project ASPs from the current peak of US 87 to US 48 in 2022 to US 30 in 2023 . Some even predicted US 26 in 2024 . Based on Frost and Sullivan Research , the Nitrile glove ASP s are a Bell curve with the followings .
CY 2019 US 23.1 CY 2020 US 38.0 CY 2021 US 85.1 CY 2022 US 53.5 CY 2023 US 35.1 CY 2024 US 30.5 CY 2025 US 27.2
It is important for us to know what will be the res[ective PATs as the ASP goes down from the current peak to the respective levels .Since different glove makers has different Nitrile to Latex ratio, the blended ASPs ( weighted average ) will be different . A different ASP , Capacities and NET margins will give different Earnings .
Lets look at supermx historical data and then provide a more realistic projections .
FY 2019 ( July 2018 - June 2019 )
Revenue = 1489 millions PAT = 124 millions Capacity = 22 billions per year
Nett Margin = 124/1489 = 8.3 % Blended ASP = 1489/4.1/22/0.85 = US 19.4
FY 2020 ( July 2019 - June 2020 )
Revenue = 2131 millions PAT - 526 millions Capacity = 24 billions per year
Based on the above Actual and FACTUAL Data ,Supermx FY 2020 blended ASP was US 24.9 which will give a Net margin of 24.7 % . With capacity of 24 billions , it generates a PAT of 526 millions With simple maths , a capacity of 48 billions will generate double the profits to 1052 millions .
If the blended ASP is US 30 , a 20 % higher than US 24.9 , the PAT should be about double if we use the same utilization of 85 % and net margin of 24.7 % . ASP 30 should actually give a higher than 24.7 % margin .
To summarise , all the IBs had too low a valuations for supermx . They underestimated the PAT by either using a much lower Nett margin or much lower capacity or utilization rates . THey also use much lower PEs and did not consider the Super dividends the shareholders will receive during the pandemic periods .
Disclaimer : This write up is not a buy or sell call . It is intended for sharing with serious investors . Civilised comments are welcomed .
Good morning PJ Seow, any idea how large/big will be the estimated hoard of Cash Reserve of Supermax at the end of this financial year/ next financial year. Thank You for your hard works.
The co. is paying you to HOLD for more than 2 years(comparing to FD rate) for the price to go back above 3.50 or more... it may drop to 2.50 or lower in the meantime but it won't worry me!
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
MoneyMakers
7,647 posts
Posted by MoneyMakers > 2021-09-05 20:29 |
Post removed.Why?